*president trump is seriously dangerous*

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby vince » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:27 am

seemslikeadream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:59 am wrote:In total there are 119 users online :: 1 registered, 2 hidden and 116 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)


THE RIGHT WING
'Explaining Hitler' Author Breaks Silence: Trump Uses 'Mein Kampf Playbook' to Normalize Tyranny
"The truth is always worth knowing. Support your local journalist."
By David Edwards / Raw Story February 8, 2017

Historian Ron Rosenbaum spoke out this week about how President Donald Trump is using Adolf Hitler’s “playbook” from Mein Kampf for undermining democracy.

In a recent column for Los Angeles Review of Books, the author of Explaining Hitler breaks his silence about the recent U.S. election, and about how the “normalization” of Trump is strikingly similar to the Nazi Party’s march to power.

“What I want to suggest is an actual comparison with Hitler that deserves thought,” he writes. “It’s what you might call the secret technique, a kind of rhetorical control that both Hitler and Trump used on their opponents, especially the media.”

According to Rosenbaum, Trump is using the Mien Kampf “playbook” to throw the media off balance and to normalize actions and statements that would have been unthinkable just months ago.

“It looked like the right-wing parties had been savvy in bringing [Hitler] in and ‘normalizing’ him, making him a figurehead for their own advancement,” Rosenbaum notes. “Instead, it was truly the stupidest move made in world politics within the memory of mankind. It took only a few months for the hopes of normalization to be crushed.”

“Hitler’s method was to lie until he got what he wanted, by which point it was too late,” the column continues. “There is, of course, no comparison with Trump in terms of scale. His biggest policy decisions so far have been to name reprehensible figures to various cabinet posts and to enact dreadful executive orders. But this, too, is a form of destruction. While marchers and the courts have put up a fight after the Muslim ban, each new act, each new lie, accepted by default, seems less outrageous. Let’s call it what it is: defining mendacity down.”

Rosenbaum suggests that the signs were there before Trump took office: “The way Trump’s outrageous conduct and shamelessly lying mouth seemed so ridiculous we wouldn’t have to take him seriously. Until we did.”

We had heard allegations that Trump kept Hitler’s speeches by his bedside, but somehow we normalized that. We didn’t take him seriously because of all the outrageous, clownish acts and gaffes we thought would cause him to drop out of the race. Except these gaffes were designed to distract. This was his secret strategy, the essence of his success — you can’t take a stand against Trump because you don’t know where Trump is standing. You can’t find him guilty of evil, you can’t find him at all. And the tactics worked. Trump was not taken seriously, which allowed him to slip by the normal standards for an American candidate. The mountebank won. Again.

Suddenly, after the inconceivable (and, we are now beginning to realize, suspicious) Trump victory, the nation was forced to contend with what it would mean, whether the “alt-right” was a true threat or a joke to be tolerated. Did it matter that Trump had opened up a sewer pipe of racial hatred? Once again, normalization was the buzzword.

The historian concludes by recalling the final months of the Munich Post — before it was shut down by Hitler.

“The era of normalization had begun everywhere else, but the Munich Post resisted,” he writes. “Soon their office was closed. Some of the journalists ended up in Dachau, some ‘disappeared.’ But they’d won a victory for truth. A victory over normalization.”

“They never stopped fighting the lies, big and small, and left a record of defiance that was heroic and inspirational,” Rosenbaum states. “They discovered the truth about ‘endlösung’ [the Nazi plan for the extermination of the Jews] before most could have even imagined it. The truth is always worth knowing. Support your local journalist.”
http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/how- ... ed-tyranny


Against Normalization: The Lesson of the “Munich Post”
By Ron Rosenbaum

20828 114 225

FEBRUARY 5, 2017

THE TRUMP-HITLER COMPARISON. Is there any comparison? Between the way the campaigns of Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler should have been treated by the media and the culture? The way the media should act now? The problem of normalization?
Because I’d written a book called Explaining Hitler several editors had asked me, during the campaign, to see what could be said on the subject.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you all, but "Explaining Hitler" is a 'must-read' for all who come here regularly.
I'm not even a big 'reader', and it kept my interest!
vince
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:19 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby kool maudit » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:34 am

It's scary to even think it, much less to say it, but sometimes... well, it's almost like... it's at least conceivable that Trump MIGHT BE SORT OF LIKE HITLER!!!!!

I'm not sure if anyone has ever said this before but it's worth considering.
kool maudit
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby Searcher08 » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:12 am

kool maudit » Fri Feb 10, 2017 2:34 pm wrote:It's scary to even think it, much less to say it, but sometimes... well, it's almost like... it's at least conceivable that Trump MIGHT BE SORT OF LIKE HITLER!!!!!

I'm not sure if anyone has ever said this before but it's worth considering.


Incredible, incendiary thinking there!
I think he is going to invade Canada. Have you noticed how quiet he is about them? I think Operation Barbarossa-Eh? is being scheduled for July this year.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:23 am

Keep those cards and letters coming in :wave:

In total there are 102 users online :: 3 registered, 4 hidden and 83 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Fri Feb 10, 2017 7:38 pm

I'll see your Hitler and raise you an Anti-Christ!

Image

For the record, I got this piece from Jeff Wells:

Trump Isn't the Antichrist but He Is Anti-Christ

By Eric Sapp , Op-Ed Contributor
Feb 10, 2017 | 7:41 AM

A few weeks ago, I was reading a piece on President Trump's inner circle. The story talked about how Trump's son-in-law saved the family fortune by selling their real-estate holdings and investing them all in a single building: 666 Fifth Avenue ... and how he then leveraged the profits from 666 Fifth Avenue to buy a new property adjoining the family's $666 million development in New Jersey.

Image

Want to guess how high the new building being built from the profits of 666 Fifth Avenue will be? Yup, 666 feet!

I did my thesis in divinity school on Revelation and apocalyptic literature, so I was intrigued by those numbers and will admit it became a bit of a game to see what else I could find.

My favorite is that 666+666+666+6+6+6 = 2016, the year Donald Trump was elected President!

But to be fair, you can make most anything add up to 666 with enough mathematical gymnastics. So I decided to search for others signs of the apocalypse.

As it turns out, a super lunar eclipse, the phenomenon when the "moon turns to blood," is very rare. Only five "blood moons" occurred in the last century and only four during President Trump's lifetime.

Again, want to guess when the first blood moon was? The night Donald Trump was born. And the most recent time the moon turned to blood? The night after the "Values Voter Summit," when Trump articulated his vision for why Christians should follow him.

But the truth is that the imagery in Revelation wasn't intended to turn Christians into an End Times Scooby Gang, looking for clues and cosmic signs to unmask the Devil. Instead, the Biblical apocalyptic authors were delivering a powerful warning to Christians of their time (and all of us today) of how easy it is—especially in times of fear and uncertainty—for Christians to put our faith in worldly powers and strongmen, even when those leaders proclaim a message that is anti-Christ.

The problem with a singular focus on signs of the "End Times" (exegetical accuracy aside) is that doing so blinds us to the daily struggle we are called to as Christians.

No Rapture yet? Good, we don't have to worry which side we're on and can vote for a leader who denies the need for forgiveness, brags about his affairs with other men's wives, and lies about conversations his campaign now admits it had with the Russian dictator who openly meddled in our election. Because four horsemen haven't ridden out of the sky, we can continue to affirm leaders who say torture and killing women and children are necessary to keep us safe and protect American values.

So while I found the blood moon links eerie, and many of the 666 connections intriguing, there was one connection between President Trump and 666 that I found chilling.

666 Fifth Avenue falls almost perfectly in the "middle" of Fifth Avenue from north to south. And candidate Trump's famous proclamation that he could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue (where 666 Fifth is) and shoot somebody without losing any voters reflects precisely the environment and cult the Bible warns about.

President Trump didn't shoot anyone ... but look at all he has done and said and encouraged others to do in his name. Yet his followers — including most American evangelicals — did not abandon him. And this is precisely what the Biblical apocalyptic authors warned us to watch for.

The word "antichrist" is never used in Revelation. It comes from John's first letter, when John exhorts Christians to beware of false prophets and test the spirit of new leaders — to watch and listen to see if their spirit is from God or "the spirit of antichrist ... which speaks from the view point of the world and is listened to by the world."

So I ask, from which spirit do these words come: "The beauty of me is that I'm very rich ... The point is, you can never be too greedy ... You know, it really doesn't matter what the media write as long as you've got a young, and beautiful, piece of a**."

All the Biblical authors are clear that "the antichrists, the beast, the son of perdition" are most clearly known by their rejection of Christ. Is there a more fundamental rejection of Christ than to say that you alone are not in need of God's forgiveness? Cursing Christ at least acknowledges his significance — but denying the need for grace and forgiveness dismisses the necessity and efficacy of Christ's sacrifice and the foundation of all we believe.

President Trump's view of America is a fearful and dark one, to which he presents a single source of salvation: "I alone can fix it." He has told the Pope that only Trump can protect him. And Trump's only response to Senate Chaplain Barry Black's powerful words at the Prayer Breakfast was to proclaim to all that Rev. Black need not worry about his job because he had found favor with Trump — as if a godly man like Rev. Black needed or prioritized either.

Trump says he's a Christian but never talks about Jesus or what God has done in his life. Listen. When Trump talks about Christianity, it is only in terms of his own greatness and what he will give Christians.

He embodies Christ's warning of those who say, "Lord, Lord did we not do many things of power in your name" but ignore the sole criteria Jesus gives us for how He will judge the world: "feed the hungry, welcome the foreigner, comfort the prisoner."

John tells us that if all else fails, there is one certain way Christians can distinguish between the animating Spirit of truth or the spirit of falsehood that reveals the antichrists: let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God ...There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment.

Watch President Trump's inaugural address ... or most any speech he gives. When he says his favorite Bible teaching is "an eye for an eye" or advises his followers, "when people wrong you, go after those people, because it is a good feeling and because other people will see you doing it. I always get even," ask yourself: which spirit is reflected?

I do not believe Donald Trump is a supernatural spawn of Satan, ushering in the end of the world. As a total-depravity Calvinist, I know we don't need some supernatural Antichrist for humans to do horrible things or for societies to fall so far that they commit historic sins.

But after Trump's most recent executive order denying safe haven to Christians fleeing ISIS and genocide in Darfur, I feel I must speak the Biblical truth that Trump is anti-Christ.

It's not because he was born the night of a blood moon or has more connections to 666 than he does to Kevin Bacon. It's because his is a spirit of fear and emptiness, that seeks only to fill his bottomless insecurity with worldly affirmations and idols, instead of humbling himself before the only One who can make him whole. And it is that antichristian spirit that is both leading so many Christians astray and gathering such evil human forces around him in his alt-right and Russian enforcers.

I continue to pray for Trump because he is a man — like all of us — in need of God's guidance, forgiveness, and mercy. He was legally elected and is my president. But as a Christian, I absolutely reject his spirit. And I find myself in the same positions as the authors I studied in divinity school, pleading with my fellow believers flocking to his banner to remember that the federal government and worldly rulers are not from whence our salvation comes.

Don't pick the wrong side. None of us know what the next four years will bring, but I do not despair because the hope that is in me does not depend on Trump.
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Gone baby gone
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby Grizzly » Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:33 pm



David Harvey on post-neoliberalism, Trump, infrastructure, sharing economy, smart city
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby SonicG » Sat Feb 11, 2017 1:16 am

Maybe he isn't so "dangerous" after all...


Trump Foreign Policy Quickly Loses Its Sharp Edge
....
To some extent, Mr. Trump is simply undergoing the same evolution that all of his predecessors went through. Mr. Obama, who ran as an antiwar candidate, became an avid user of drone strikes and other covert counterterrorism operations pioneered by George W. Bush.
...
Michael J. Green, an Asia director in Mr. Bush’s National Security Council, noted that in the weeks before Mr. Trump took office, he suggested that the key pillars of America’s relationship with both China and Japan — the One China policy and the mutual defense treaty — would both be on the table, chips to be used in a broader negotiation.

“What’s been so interesting about the last few days is that Trump took both issues off the table,” Mr. Green said. “You can hear the sigh of relief across the whole Asia-Pacific region.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/us/p ... .html?_r=0


So the NY Times is warming to Trump as he slides into conventional Washington politics...Maximize profits for corps., cut the terrible regulations keeping them from "creating more jobs" (=further ramping up their astronomical profits on the backs of workers), drone strikes killing children..Business as usual...But I do agree that Flynn is pretty hellbent on stirring up some major ME conflict...
"a poiminint tidal wave in a notion of dynamite"
User avatar
SonicG
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby SonicG » Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:46 am

So many leaks and such small hands...You would think might push Ivanka and the Abe-shake out of the news cycle...I mean it is about nukes and all...

Just a tidbit then...
Trump denounced nuclear arms treaty in phone call with Putin – sources
...
According to accounts of the conversation given to the Guardian, the phone call began with a friendly exchange, with both leaders stressing their own popularity and complimenting each other on their domestic support. Then when Putin brought up two issues on which their countries had cooperated on, New Start and the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, Trump lost his temper, dismissing both as strategic losses for the US given away by Barack Obama, and he began hectoring Putin.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... art-treaty


Image

Ahhh c'mon...throw daddy a bone then...

Image
"a poiminint tidal wave in a notion of dynamite"
User avatar
SonicG
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby Nordic » Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:01 am

^^^^. You simply can't believe anything the media tells you these days. At all.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby SonicG » Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:15 am

Nordic » Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:01 pm wrote:^^^^. You simply can't believe anything the media tells you these days. At all.


I know...it seems like a Gilbert Shelton comic...

Image
"a poiminint tidal wave in a notion of dynamite"
User avatar
SonicG
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:57 am

Trump In Trouble: It’s The Economy, Stupid – Not Crime and Terrorists
by David Stockman, February 09, 2017
Print This | Share This
David Stockman has agreed to send every Antiwar.com reader a free copy of his newest book, Trumped! when you take his special Contra Corner offer. Click here now for the details.

We don’t get that exercised about President’s Trump’s fondness for alternate facts – especially when they elicit coronaries among the rows of talking heads on CNN. But we do draw the line at alternate reality, as when our new President told the sheriffs’ posse visiting the White House Tuesday that the US murder rate is

"…..the highest it’s been in, I guess, 45-47 years."

Actually, it’s still near a 45 year low!

In fact, it’s less than half the 1970 rate and two-thirds the rate during the Reagan era. The slight uptick in the national murder rate during 2015-16 (not shown below) was mostly attributable to seven urban areas – Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland,Houston, Milwaukee, Nashville and Washington DC. Even then, only 25 of the nation’s largest 100 cities saw a recent increase in violent crime, according to FBI statistics.

But our purpose is not to quibble with the Donald’s errant facts. The problem is his worldview. When he said at the Republican convention is July that the nation is faced with "a moment of crisis" caused by "violence in our streets and chaos in our communities", he was talking alternate reality.

The truth is, the vast majority of American communities are safer today than they have been in decades and that violent crime rates have literally plunged. Thus, compared to about 750 reported violent crimes per 100,000 population in 1992, the rated in 2014 was only 375.

Likewise, when he rushed pell-mell to issue the travel ban during the first week in office, he claimed an urgency about terrorists lurking among refugees and visa-holders from the seven named countries that absolutely does not exist.
Image


Indeed, the US has admitted upwards of 900,000 refugees since the turn of the century and there has not been a terrorist incident from among them; nor have there been any terrorist acts on US soil attributable to visa-holders from the travel ban countries.

So if it were just a more strenuous vetting process that the White House wanted, it could have taken a few months to redesign the procedures in an even more stringent direction than already exists and made them applicable to dozens of countries – including non-Muslim majority nations – where local terrorism has been a factor.

It could have also spent this time insuring that the new vetting procedures had been properly vetted among the relevant Federal agencies and that Capitol Hill – which is crawling with tough on terror types anyway – had been giving a thorough heads up.

After all, there was no emergency and not a shred of evidence that the currently approved pipeline of visa-holders and approved refugee applicants presented any more heightened risk than the nonexistent risk evident in the record. And we are especially confident of the latter assertion because this particular White House crew would have been screaming like banshees if they had any evidence at all that bad guys had slipped through the process under Obama.

But then again, the lickety-split travel ban was a Steve Bannon special. It had nothing to do with facts on the ground or risks to American communities. Instead, it was the opening salvo in an alt-Right campaign to drastically intensify public fear of immigrants and terrorists and thereby mobilize a political majority based on nationalism, law and order and closing down the nation’s borders.

And that’s the alternate reality of which we speak. America doesn’t need a Super-Sheriff in the White House leading a crackdown on domestic criminals and terrorists.

Instead, it needs an economic statesman with the good sense to see that Washington is drifting toward a fiscal catastrophe and that the Fed’s 30-year regime of Bubble Finance has sucked the economic lifeblood out of Flyover America – even as it showered the 1% and the bicoastal elites with egregious windfalls of unearned prosperity.

Unfortunately, the Donald’s penchant for tough-guy bluster is playing straight into the hands of the alt-Right vanguard ensconced at the very center of the White House. This was evident at yesterday’s sheriff’s convocation when Trump went straight for the bait on civil forfeiture carried out by law enforcement.

There is probably no greater abuse of constitutional liberties in America today than that posed by the soaring seizure of money and property from citizens accused but not yet convicted, or even indicted, for acts of crime or terrorism by law enforcement.

Proceeds from civil seizure have become a major revenue source at all levels of government – with the annual haul now exceeding $5 billion or 5X more than a decade ago. And Washington has gotten fully in on the act through drug war driven seizures where "assets" in just one fund have increased nine-fold since 2005.

Image

In fact, substantially more money is seized by law enforcement annually than is stolen by robbers and thieves. Indeed, since a high share of forfeiture proceeds are from unconvicted citizens, it is fair to say that the police are stealing more than the burglars.

Image

Needless to say, advocates of civil forfeiture argue that it allows law enforcement to effectively combat terrorism and the drug trade, and that is apparently good enough for the Donald – civil liberties be damned.

So at yesterday’s meeting Trump piled on after hearing one of the attending sheriffs complain about the possible curtailment of the practice in Texas:

“On asset forfeiture, we’ve got a state senator in Texas that was talking about introducing legislation to require conviction before we could receive that forfeiture money,” Eavenson said.

“Can you believe that?” Trump interjected.

“And I told him that the cartel would build a monument to him in Mexico if he could get that legislation passed,” the Texas sheriff continued.

“Who is the state senator? Do you want to give his name? We’ll destroy his career,” Trump replied, presumably suggesting that the lawmaker would suffer for holding a position contrary to the president’s.

Well, let’s see now about where Trump stands on the great economic and fiscal challenges facing the nation while he bloviates about a state senator who apparently believes in the U.S. Constitution’s 4th Amendment protections.

The short answer is that he is nowhere. The White House has already become so distracted by co-President Bannon’s alt-Right agenda, and the mounting backlash from it, that it doesn’t even have an economic team on the field.

That’s right. Nearly three weeks after the Inauguration the three key posts – Treasury Secretary, OMB Director and CEA head – have not been confirmed.

We know from experience that an empty economic bench at this crucial time is a far larger problem than might be apparent to most observers. That’s because we also recall that Ronald Reagan got his sweeping tax cuts and fiscal reforms through by Labor Day of his first year only by a hair – and only then because his full team was in place before the inauguration.

In fact, we had a half dozen economic and budget briefing during the first 20 days of January, and virtually every day after the swearing in. Accordingly, by February 7th President Reagan had reviewed and approved hundreds of spending cuts and signed off on the details of his sweeping tax reduction plan.

By February 14th – the equivalent of a week from today – all decisions had been locked down, the numbers had been crunched on what amounted to a multi-trillion five-year economic recovery plan, and a 100-page outline of that plan was on its way to the government printing office for Reagan’s February 18th address to Congress.

By contrast, what Trump has in place at the White House economic council is his very own plenipotentiary from Goldman Sachs, Gary Cohn, who has made his first order of business gutting Dodd-Frank. He also has a billionaire LBO artist at the Commerce Department, who wants to make America Great again by saving Boeing’s corporate welfare at the Ex-Im Bank and erecting protectionist barriers to foreign imports.

To be clear, we don’t have any brief for Dodd-Frank and think it should be repealed in its entirety, nor do we object to wealthy businessmen "giving back" to their country. But Wilbur Ross and Gary Cohn have been lifelong beneficiaries of the Wall Street/Washington debt and money printing regime, and are not about to support the number one action needed to actually restore capitalist prosperity in America.

We are referring to the need for a complete housing-cleaning at the Fed and the replacement of its cabal of Keynesian monetary central planners with advocates of sound money and restoration of free market price discovery in the financial markets.

To that end, Trump urgently needs to demand the immediate resignations of Janet Yellen and Stanley Fischer. That would precipitate a political firestorm about the so-called "independence" of the Fed, and also a thundering crash of the current egregiously bloated bubbles in the stock market, which are going to implode soon under their own weight, anyway.

But by acting preemptively, Trump could take a page from Ronald Reagan’s playbook and get the crisis over early, while blaming it – and properly so – on the policies he inherited from Obama and the Eccles Building.

Unfortunately, the Donald has gotten enamored with playing National Sheriff and following the playbook of CO-President Bannon. Before he knows it, however, the White House will be so impaled in pointless judicial and political battles over the travel ban, the exaggerated threat of domestic terrorism, the stupidity of his Wall with Mexico and what is already the busted attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare, that he will not see the swirling fiscal and economic crisis coming straight at him.

Yet any day now the casino gamblers will realize that the Trump Stimulus was always a giant delusion, and that the big earnings-boosting corporate tax cut and the vaunted trillion dollar infrastructure stimulus are dead on arrival.

That’s all to the good because a nation with $20 trillion of debt and $10 trillion more built-in over the next decade under current policy can’t afford more Keynesian fiscal stimulus – let along the trillions Trump promised during the campaign. But it also means that the resulting stock market crash will precipitate a recession – as the stock price and options obsessed C-suites of corporate America desperately liquidate hoarded inventories and labor just like they did in the fall of 2008.

In short, the Trump Administration is only weeks away from descending into an economic and fiscal nightmare. That will include a debt ceiling crisis by mid-summer and government shutdowns over increasing the soon to be frozen borrowing limit by trillions. It will be exacerbated by the need to extend expiring continuing resolutions – a rolling crisis that will last throughout 2017 and behind.

It will also include a bitter Congressional battle over lifting the defense caps, as demanded by Trump’s posse of generals and hawks, while keeping the caps on domestic appropriations in place; and a swelling deficit that will quickly bust through the $1 trillion per year level and shatter what remains of the GOP’s fragile majorities.

In the meanwhile, the Donald is huffing and puffing at an unnamed Texas state senator.

He will soon wish, however, that he hadn’t gotten distracted by the alternate reality of the alt-Right.

Regards,
David Stockman
http://original.antiwar.com/David_Stock ... errorists/



Wall Street Journal Columnist Praises Trump’s $100 Billion Gift To Wall Street
The Journal’s Greg Ip Calls Trump’s Watering Down Of Consumer Protections “Regulatory Relief”
The Wall Street Journal’s top financial columnist praised President Donald Trump for issuing executive orders aimed to scale back consumer protections in the financial industry because the rollbacks would boost profits for big banks, ignoring the reality that the rules were put in place to protect the public, not the banking industry.

The Journal’s chief economics commentator, Greg Ip, hailed recent actions by Trump to curb government oversight of big banks in a February 8 column, claiming this would provide “regulatory relief” by addressing “a serious flaw” in banking regulations that focused merely on “financial stability and consumer protection” and “largely ignored the [regulatory] costs.” Ip noted that consumer advocate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi took issue with letting banks have more leeway, but he dismissed their concerns, stating, “The worriers should relax.” From The Wall Street Journal:

The worriers should relax. In the 10 years since the financial crisis began, the regulatory pendulum has moved relentlessly in the direction of tougher restrictions on finance. Mr. Trump’s order reverses the direction of the pendulum but there is little sign his administration wants it back to where it was in 2007.

His order does, however, address a serious flaw in the post-crisis regulatory crackdown: In pursuit of financial stability and consumer protection, it largely ignored the costs of forgone lending, economic growth and consumer choice. Mr. Trump has signaled those costs must now be taken into account. He has asked his Treasury Secretary (now awaiting confirmation) to report back in 120 days on how well current regulations promote growth, efficiency and competitiveness. Over time, that could generate a better balanced supply of credit to a wider range of companies and households without making the financial system much riskier.

Ip continued that the consumer protections built into the Dodd-Frank Act, the CARD Act, and the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, which requires financial advisers to work in their clients’ best interests, “have carved into banks’ profitability” since their pre-recession peak. Ip concluded that the rules enacted after the 2008 financial crisis do little to prevent another financial crisis, except for rules that increased the amount of hard money a bank must hold in reserve relative to its debt risks. But Ip claimed the Trump administration “doesn’t appear to plan on rolling [capital requirements] back much.”

The executive orders that Ip praised directed departments to account for the regulatory costs of consumer protections when deciding which rules to roll back, which the Journal’s own reporting has concluded could create a $100 billion windfall for investors by loosening capital requirements at banks. These capital requirements are the same ones that Ip argued stand “the best chance of preventing another financial crisis.”

Ip argued that “a serious flaw” in the current slate of consumer protections is that they focus on protecting consumers and “in theory” could “reduce growth,” but in reality the three biggest banks reported strong fourth quarter earnings last year and CNBC reported that banks enjoyed record profits in the second quarter of 2016. These reports coincide with a February 2016 report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which found that the regulatory structure created after Dodd-Frank “has contributed to the overall growth and stability in the U.S. economy.”

Ip’s emphasis on bank profits fails to recognize that Dodd-Frank, the CARD Act, and the fiduciary rule are designed to minimize exploitation, not maximize profit. Dodd-Frank was enacted to protect the economy by empowering the Federal Reserve System with broader banking oversight and created new protections for consumers through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CARD Act created even more protections for consumers, including limiting interest rate hikes on credit cards. The fiduciary rule ensures consumers receive financial advice catered to their best interests rather than their adviser’s bottom line, something that Ross Eisenbrey of the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) characterized as a“no-brainer” given that the investment advice industry “makes billions of dollars from conflicted advice.”

If Ip really wants the Trump administration to focus on increasing bank profits, heaping praise on executive orders that will weaken the economy and undermine an already profitable financial industry is a bizarre place to start. Jeff Spross of The Week put it bluntly in a February 6 column blasting Trump’s regulatory rollback: “Who on Earth would view deregulating the financial industry as a good idea?” Writing for The Guardian, Nils Pratley didn’t mince words either, characterizing the concept that banks are over-regulated as a “half-baked idea” and “nonsense” while adding that there is little evidence of consumer protections standing in the way of the industry’s growth.

Ip’s decision to defend Trump’s attempts to deregulate the financial sector may lend credence to reports that the Journal is intentionally taking a softer tone with the president and pressuring reporters “to reflect pro-Trump viewpoints” in articles. The Journal’s behavior is not surprising, as its right-wing editorial board has led a years-long campaign against consumer protections.
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2017/02/1 ... eet/215308
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby SonicG » Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:28 am

I don't know about Trump, but asset forfeiture has always been fascist...
"a poiminint tidal wave in a notion of dynamite"
User avatar
SonicG
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby DrEvil » Sat Feb 11, 2017 4:20 pm

SonicG » Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:15 pm wrote:
Nordic » Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:01 pm wrote:^^^^. You simply can't believe anything the media tells you these days. At all.


I know...it seems like a Gilbert Shelton comic...

Image


Image

Especially for the next four years.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:46 pm

The Timeline


Gerald Herbert
ByJOSH MARSHALLPublished
FEBRUARY 12, 2017, 1:13 PM EDT

As the allegations surrounding National Security Advisor Michael Flynn escalate, I wanted to put together for my own use a timeline of key events in this story. The story, as I see it, is the pervasive evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election and widespread, though murky, evidence of ties between the Russian government the Trump campaign.

I've always been partial to timelines because ... well, we live in time. Chronology is the basic organizing principle of our existence. It allows us to get our heads around scatterings of facts in much the way a good chart allows us to synthesize numerical data. Of course, a timeline can create the impression of causation where none exists. It's important to keep that in mind. Still, it's helpful to get a lot of information in one place organized in time. It helps us bound what events can possibly be causally related as well as how they may or may not be related.

A few notes.

One point I was trying to illuminate for myself was when Michael Flynn became associated with Donald Trump. I took a renewed interest in this in light of reports that Flynn's communications with the Russian Ambassador to the United States began during the campaign, not during the transition period. So when did the campaign start for Flynn? As nearly as I can tell from contemporaneous press reports, Flynn's first meeting with Trump was in the late summer of 2015. Something like an official advisory role began in the Spring of 2016.

This is a timeline in progress. I'm still adding details. For the moment, I haven't added claims of applications for FISA warrants, first denied and later approved. It seems likely to me that these occurred. But the reporting remains murky. I've tried to keep the timeline to publicly known incidents and events or those attested and confirmed with specific details by multiple, credible news sources.

June 16th, 2015: Donald Trump announces his candidacy for President of the United States.

Circa Summer 2015: The US government alleges that Russian hackers first gain access to DNC computer networks.

Circa August 2015: Trump staff arranges first meeting between Trump and General Flynn, according to Flynn's account in an August 2016 interview with The Washington Post. "I got a phone call from his team. They asked if he would be willing meet with Mr. Trump and I did. … In late summer 2015."

August 8th, 2015: Roger Stone leaves formal role in Trump campaign. Whether he quits or was fired is disputed. Stone will continue as a key, albeit informal advisor, for the remainder of the campaign.

December 10th, 2015: Michael Flynn attends conference and banquet in Moscow to celebrate the 10th anniversary of RT (formerly Russia today). Flynn is seated next to Russian President Vladimir Putin at the concluding banquet.

March 21st, 2016: In a meeting with The Washington Post editorial board, Trump provides a list of five foreign policy advisors. The list includes Carter Page but not Michael Flynn. The list is Walid Phares, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Joe Schmitz, and ret. Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg.

March 28th, 2016: Trump campaign hires Paul Manafort to oversee delegate operations for campaign. Manafort becomes the dominant figure running the campaign by late April and takes over as campaign manager on June 21st with the firing of campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.

February-April 2016: Flynn advisory relationship with Trump appears to have solidified over the Spring of 2016. In late January Flynn is mentioned as an advisor who has "regular interactions" with Trump. There are similar mentions in February and March. Yet as late as mid-March, Flynn appeared to downplay his ties to Trump. By May Flynn is routinely listed as an advisor and by late May is even being mooted as a possible vice presidential pick.

April 2016: DNC network administrators first notice suspicious activity on Committee computer networks in late April, 2016, according to The Washington Post. The DNC retains the services of network security firm Crowdstrike which expels hackers from the DNC computer network. Crowdstrike tells The Washington Post it believes hackers had been operating inside the DNC networks since the Summer of 2015.

June 14, 2016: Washington Post publishes first account of hacking of the DNC computer networks, allegedly by hackers working on behalf of the Russian government.

July 11th-12th, 2016: Trump campaign officials intervene to remove language calling for providing Ukraine with lethal aid against Russian intervention is Crimea and eastern Ukraine. It is, reportedly, the only significant Trump campaign intervention in the platform in which the Trump campaign has allowed activists a free hand.

July 12th, 2016: Official publication date, The Field of Fight by Michael Flynn and Michael Ledeen.

July 22, 2016: Wikileaks releases first tranche of DNC emails dating from January 2015 to May 2016.

July 27th, 2016: Donald Trump asks Russia to hack Clinton's email to find 33,000 alleged lost emails: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find the 33,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

August 1st, 2016: Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort denies Trump campaign changed GOP platform on Russia and Ukraine.

August 14th, 2016: The New York Times publishes story detailing handwritten ledgers showing "$12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort from Mr. Yanukovych’s pro-Russian political party from 2007 to 2012, according to Ukraine’s newly formed National Anti-Corruption Bureau."

August 19, 2016: Paul Manafort resigns from Trump campaign.

August 21, 2016: Trump advisor Roger Stone tweets: "Trust me, it will soon [sic] the Podesta's time in the barrel."

September 26th, 2016: Trump Russia-Europe Policy Advisor Carter Page steps down from campaign while disputing allegations that he engaged in private communications with Russian government officials. A Yahoo News article from three days earlier reported that US intelligence officials were probing whether he met privately with Russian officials in Moscow in July, including an alleged meeting with close Putin ally Igor Sechin, Chairman of Russian oil company Rosneft.

September 26th, 2016: At first presidential debate, Donald Trump casts doubt on Russian role in hacking campaign: "It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds."

October 7, 2016: A "Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence" officially accuses the Russian government of being behind hacking of the DNC "to interfere with the US election process."

October 7, 2016: Wikileaks releases first batch of Podesta emails - one hour after release of Access Hollywood Trump tape.

October 12th, 2016: Stone says he has been in contact with Assange through an intermediary.

October 30th, 2016: In response to FBI Director James Comey's letter to Congress about new developments in the Clinton email server probe, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid writes a public letter to Comey in which he claims: “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government."

December 9th, 2016: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) hand delivers a selection of memos (aka 'the Steele dossier') to FBI Director James Comey.

December 29th, 2016: President Barack Obama outlines a wave a sanctions and expulsions of Russian diplomat in response to Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

December 29th, 2016: Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov vows retaliation for sanctions.

December 29th, 2016: Incoming National Security Michael Flynn has multiple phone conversations with Russian Sergey Kislyak. It is later reported that the calls covered US sanctions and suggestions that Obama's punitive actions could be undone in a matter of weeks. Trump administration officials had repeatedly denied that the conversations involved more than pleasantries and logistics about future meetings.

December 29th-30th, 2016: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announces preliminary plans to expel American diplomats.

December 30th, 2016: Russian President Vladimir Putin says he will not retaliate against sanctions and expulsions but await presidency of Donald Trump.

January 19th, 2017: The New York Times reports that the FBI is leading an interagency task force probing ties between Russia and three close Trump associates: Paul Manafort, Carter Page and Roger Stone.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-timeline--2





So Much Winning
ByJOSH MARSHALLPublishedFEBRUARY 12, 2017, 3:13 PM EST
Trump's net approval reaches -15 in latest Gallup poll.

Image

The Parade of Lies
ByJOSH MARSHALLPublishedFEBRUARY 12, 2017, 2:24 PM EST
Godwin's law notwithstanding, this is Goebbels-level stuff.

From White House policy chief Stephen Miller earlier this morning on Fox ...
The United States of America has a terrorism problem. We’ve had hundreds cases of foreign national[s] entering our country from other countries and plotting, attempting, or even carrying out terrorist attacks. We’ve spent countless dollars a year, and we have thousands of federal officers and investigators who do nothing but run around the country trying to stop terrorist attacks for no other reason because we make the mistake of letting people in who harbor hatred for this country.
Our immigration system should not be a vehicle for admitting people who have anything but love in their hearts for this nation and this Constitution.

There is no evidence for this whatsoever.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: *president trump is seriously dangerous*

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:54 pm

Image

Why Is Trump Adviser Wearing Medal of Nazi Collaborators?

by Eli Clifton

The White House’s omission of Jewish victims of the Holocaust in its statement for Holocaust Remembrance Day raised objections from Jewish groups across the political spectrum but the Trump administration’s combative defense was perhaps the most surprising move by a presidency facing record low approval numbers. Last Monday, Deputy Assistant to the President Sebastian Gorka refused to admit that that it may have been poor judgement not to specifically acknowledge the suffering of Jews in the Holocaust.

Gorka was an odd choice of proxies for the White House to put forward in defense of its Holocaust Remembrance day statement.

He has appeared in multiple photographs wearing the medal of a Hungarian group listed by the State Department as having collaborated with the Nazis during World War II.

When asked on Monday whether the White House’s Holocaust Remembrance Day statement was “questionable in being the first such statement in many years that didn’t recognize that Jewish extermination was the chief goal of the Holocaust,” Gorka told conservative talk show host Michael Medved:

No, I’m not going to admit it. Because it’s asinine. It’s absurd. You’re making a statement about the Holocaust. Of course it’s about the Holocaust because that’s what the statement’s about. It’s only reasonable to twist it if your objective is to attack the president.
That statement is particularly noteworthy when viewed in the context of Gorka’s apparent affinity for a Hungarian group with a checkered past.

Gorka, who worked in the UK and Hungary before immigrating to the U.S., was photographed at an inaugural ball wearing a medal from the Hungarian Order of Heroes, Vitezi Rend, a group listed by the State Department as taking direction from Germany’s Nazi government during World War II.

Gorka did not respond to a request for comment but appeared to be wearing the medal on his chest during the Trump inauguration ball and in an undated photo posted on his Facebook page.

Image

Image
Hungarian Collaborators

Eva Balogh, founder of the news analysis blog Hungarian Spectrum and former professor of Eastern European History at Yale University, confirmed to LobeLog the identity of the medal worn by Gorka. She said:

Yes, the medal is of the “vitézi rend” established by Miklós Horthy in 1920. He, as a mere governor, didn’t have the privilege to ennoble his subjects as the king could do before 1918, and therefore the “knightly order” he established was a kind of compensation for him. Officers and even enlisted men of exceptional valor could become knights. Between 1920 and 1944 there were 23,000 such knights. The title was inheritable by the oldest son. I found information that makes it clear that Gorka’s father, Pál Gorka, used the title. However, since he was born in 1930 he couldn’t himself be the one “knighted.” So, most likely, it was Gorka’s grandfather who was the original recipient.
Gorka’s PhD dissertation lists his name as “Sebestyén L. v. Gorka,” which suggests that he is carrying on his father’s title, albeit in an abbreviated format, according to Balogh.

Image
The Order of Vitezi
Miklós Horthy, regent of the Kingdom of Hungary from 1920 to 1944, established Vitezi Rend for both civilian and military supporters of Horthy’s government. The group was initially open to non-Jews who served in distinction during World War I.

Although Horthy’s personal views about Jews are still debated, he was explicit in endorsing anti-Semitism even while showing some unease with the pace of the Holocaust. In an October 1940 letter to Prime Minister Pál Teleki, Horthy said:

As regards the Jewish problem, I have been an anti-Semite throughout my life. I have never had contact with Jews. I have considered it intolerable that here in Hungary everything, every factory, bank, large fortune, business, theatre, press, commerce, etc. should be in Jewish hands, and that the Jew should be the image reflected of Hungary, especially abroad. Since, however, one of the most important tasks of the government is to raise the standard of living, i.e., we have to acquire wealth, it is impossible, in a year or two, to replace the Jews, who have everything in their hands, and to replace them with incompetent, unworthy, mostly big-mouthed elements, for we should become bankrupt. This requires a generation at least.
In April 1941, Hungary became a de facto member of the Axis and permitted German troops to cross Hungary for the invasion of Yugoslavia. The first massacres of Jews took place in August when SS troops murdered between 18,000 and 20,000 Jews without Hungarian citizenship after they’d been deported from Hungary to Ukraine.

Image
Horthy and Hitler
By 1944, Horthy may have sought to distance Hungary from Nazi Germany but agreed to deport around 100,000 Jews. The German army removed Horthy from office after it occupied Hungary. Horthy’s actual awareness of the fate of Hungarian Jews remains unclear. But reports by journalists and the State Department in 1942 are explicit about the role played and benefits enjoyed by Vitezi Rend’s members.

A Jewish Telegraph Agency report from October 1942, describes how:

Confiscated Jewish real estate in Hungary will be distributed by the government among members of the “Hungarian Order of Heroes” it was announced today over the Budapest radio. The order consists of soldiers who distinguished themselves in the last World War or in the present war.
“In 1942 there was a so-called ‘land reform,’” said Balogh. “It actually meant the expropriation of agricultural lands owned by Jewish citizens. According to government propaganda this move was necessary to ease social tensions in the countryside but as a recent study (2015) shows, most of the land went to “loyal, middle-class supporters of the regime, among them members of the ‘vitézi rend.’”

A Checkered Legacy

The State Department lists the Order of Heroes as an organization that was “under the direction of the Nazi government of Germany.” Membership in such groups during World War II could make individuals ineligible for U.S. visas. The State Department’s website warns that membership in groups under this designation:

[R]enders ineligible for a visa any alien who participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion during the period from March 23, 1933, to May 8, 1945, under the direction of or in association with the Nazi Government of Germany or an allied or occupied government.
Vitezi Rend was banned during the Soviet occupation of Hungary but reestablished in exile. The order was awarded to members of the Hungarian diaspora and individuals in Hungary since 1983. Although appearing to largely promote Hungarian culture and the diaspora, it sought foreign donors to help fund the construction of a statue of Horthy in 2011. A fundraising document read, “We have decided after almost seven decades to erect a statue in honor of our beloved Regent and to remember him, therefore we ask for your support!”

“In post-World War II Hungary, no noble titles of any sort can be officially used,” said Balogh. “The ‘knightly order’ no longer officially exists. However, right-wing émigrés kept the order going abroad.”

She later added, “Many supporters of the Horthy regime were enamored by the Nazis and Hitler and the ‘knights’ were especially so. Put it that way, after 1948 one wouldn’t have bragged about his father being a ‘vitéz.’ Lately, however, especially since 2010, it has become fashionable again to boast about such ‘illustrious’ ancestors.”

Horthy, under Hungary’s center-right Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, has undergone a controversial rehabilitation, with squares renamed in his honor and statues erected.

Gorka’s decision to publicly identify with Vitezi Rend raises questions about Trump’s adviser and the administration’s flirtations with anti-Semitism and the alt-right. It’s even more awkward that he’s the person defending the administration’s explicit omission of Jewish victim of the Holocaust from the Holocaust Remembrance Day statement.
http://lobelog.com/why-is-trump-adviser ... aborators/



Priebus, Flynn, others on thin ice

Andrew Harnik / AP
Imagine you're Reince Priebus. Every day, you hear speculation that your days as White House chief of staff are numbered. You wake up on a Sunday and read that colleague Kellyanne Conway's dream job is, well, yours.

Then, you flick on CNN to see Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy — a Trump pal of 10 years (and Mar-a-Lago member) who just spent time alone with him in Florida — saying this on "Reliable Sources": "The White House is showing not the amount of order that we need to see. I think there's a lot of weakness coming out of the chief of staff."

After a pleading call from Priebus, Ruddy tweeted: "Reince just briefed me on new WH plans. Impressive! CNN today my personal view. Told him I have 'open mind' based on his results." Then Ruddy got another call: "Jared Kushner tells me COS Reince is doing 'amazing job.'"

Not a reassuring end to your third week on the job!

But this is a problem hardly confined to Priebus: After watching Trump clean house several times during the campaign, everyone feels on thin ice. This naturally breeds insecurity, ass-covering and endless leaking. Those who don't fear for their hide are busy gaming out how they rise when someone falls. Trump feeds all of this. It's why an insider describes the White House hierarchy as "fragile."

"These people are insecure because Trump does not respect them," said a person in constant contact with the West Wing. "He does not because they have not made any money. He respects [Stephen] Bannon and Gary Cohn because they are financially successful."

Trump has already consulted friends about his next chief of staff. I'm told that to avoid admitting error, Trump plans a smooth transition from Priebus (could be a year), perhaps by making him a Cabinet secretary!

Trump is trying to figure out who he should trust. This is totally new for him, so he's trying to figure out who the strong ones are and who the weak ones are.
— Chris Ruddy, in a phone interview with Axios

Heather Nauert, the news anchor on "Fox & Friends," was spotted at the White House last week — talking to Trump, we're told, about a communications job. Yesterday she tweeted that she's buying Ivanka Trump shoes in solidarity after Nordstrom dropped the line, and will wear them on "Fox & Friends" this week.

That certainly doesn't make embattled West Wing officials feel any more secure as they try to put out what one called "400 fires a day."

Any purge will begin with national security adviser Mike Flynn, for lying to Vice President Pence about contacts with Russia on sanctions. In retrospect, that was clear as soon as Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Friday that he didn't know about the story, which had been on the front page of that morning's Washington Post. It was a way for Trump to dodge showing support for Flynn.

"Spread the butter: He is toast," said a top source. "Lying to Pence damaged Pence's credibility and the administration's. That is an unpardonable sin."
https://www.axios.com/priebus-flynn-oth ... 44334.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests