Should the CIA choose our President?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby brekin » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:12 pm

Elvis wrote:
brekin wrote:Sorry bro, you have to leave your heroes at the door at RI.


Sorry sister, you have to leave your assumptions about who my heroes are at the door. Your breezy assumption is wrong.
Editor of Mother Jones. Not an intellectual. Right, okay.
A big house! OMG! Next he'll be setting U.S. economic policy!
Moore's mother was a secretary, his father an auto assembly line worker. Trump started with $200M from his father. The comparison is ludicrous.


First, I'm not a sister, but a bro.
Second, you have said nothing to refute that Moore is elite/1%.
That "big house" is more commonly called a mansion and is in an elite neighborhood as different demographicly from Flint as possible. And he is literally profiting handsomely from the very corporations and systems he rails about. As well as profiting from his business of railing against them. That is called being a hypocrite, which is not the same as an intellectual. Both he and Trump are mult-millionaires pretending to speak for the working classes and exposing how the system is corrupt and broken while getting rich off of it. Don't be blinded by the sweats.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby dada » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:26 pm

JackRiddler » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:15 pm wrote:.
The question has a number of false premises. There is no "we." If there was, there certainly would be no "our" president. There should be no president at all, this is a bad system for this particular country and people. There should be no CIA.
.


This crossed my mind when I first read the new title for this thread. I'm glad somebody said it.

Similar to if I were from a different country, I can understand what the title is getting at, but it doesn't apply to me. Except it doesn't apply in any way, as if I'm from a different planet, or another dimension.

But I'm not. This is my planet, in my dimension. I guess it all depends on how you look at it.

As for the 'should I "support" the deep state faction that is uninstalling Donald' question, I've been giving it some thought today. It doesn't really matter, does it? Do they need my support? Do they care if they don't have it? Of course not.

So, sure. They have my full support. Go ahead, boys. You have my permission.

That's about all the time that is worth spending on this silliness, I think. I don't care about the booing and cheering social spectacle surrounding it. Chatterboxes, distracting themselves from evolving, as usual.

Oh yeah. Trolls, I don't like them. This whole Donald crashing and burning fiasco is very demoralizing for them. So that's a good thing.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:30 pm

You are both (elvis and brekin) writing about Moore without bothering to define or agree on common definitions of "elite," class, institutions, power, position, etc. Thus you are bound to talk past each other, with the advantage of being completely right, no matter what you say, even if you don't even know what you said. And you can be certain the other guy is wrong.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby Grizzly » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:38 pm

Anybody seen this?

Intel Community Is Sabotaging Trump! - Warns Notable DEMOCRAT.


Dennis Kucinich explains the recent national security moves that were made and how it might drastically affect the future.

Jimmy Dore breaks it down.


Not familiar w/ this guy but ran across it on my surf.. I think he's part of the Young Turks, but that's all I know...

Frightening implications however...
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby Karmamatterz » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:16 pm

JackRiddler wrote:

“He has not yet accumulated the same record in the mass murder department but I've got serious problems with those who don't see the evident intent to match them and do worse.
………..
There is absolutely an opportunistic aspect here and that is also good. He should be brought down in part because he CAN BE brought down! To beat back and discredit these violent and barbarous politics is a huge opportunity. Absolutely, the real left (the left that has never been in the corporate media, and maybe was half-represented by Sanders) should ride it for all it's worth organizationally and build a coalition and alliances out of all the single issue causes that are already out there.”

“Also, it's readily apparent that you're brilliant in many ways. You don't need to call other people idiots and morons to make a point.

xo

Maybe it's part of the point, however. There really is no excuse for people who are playing the Trump apologetics”


No, Jack, maybe you’re off a bit in your analysis. But then, I’m really not all that much myself. What I’ve been trying to get across to people as I can really only speak for myself is this: I am not a Trump supporter.

What many people can’t seem to shake is the binary thinking. The hysterics that are infecting so many people seem to make them unable to realize that perhaps there are some people who find the idea of the CIA, FBI, NSA etc having any say in who are elected officials should be rather unsavory. It’s actually revolting. I could care less that it’s Trump. I would be equally disgusted if the same thing happened to Obama. It would be a hard pill to swallow but I would not like it if the same thing happened to Dubya or Slick.

No matter how much many of us think Trump is awful and could really make a mess of things, he was elected. As flawed as our democratic republic (Oligarchy) is, that is the deal. I’ll take the flawed messed up system we have before anarchy and a real dictator taking power.

I’m curious how far you would be willing to go to get the president removed? To say the president should be brought down because he can be is creepy and fascist.

Further Jack, it may make our stomach turn but the media is not is close to be as evil in their influence in the election as it would be for the CIA or FBI. The alpha agency employees are sworn government servants, the media is not.

Grizzly, thanks for posting the video link. Kucinich nailed it, he spoke truth.
User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby brekin » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:44 pm

JackRiddler wrote:You are both (elvis and brekin) writing about Moore without bothering to define or agree on common definitions of "elite," class, institutions, power, position, etc. Thus you are bound to talk past each other, with the advantage of being completely right, no matter what you say, even if you don't even know what you said. And you can be certain the other guy is wrong.


I think I've been pretty plain in what criteria Moore is elite/1% bolded below (for those who need it spelled out and don't read links: by his income level and how he has been able to amass his fortune (parlaying his gains from anti-capitalist/anti-corporate/anti-military-industrial complex/anti-war/anti-big pharma films into the very same stocks of those corporations while continuing to pose as a working class figure of the 99% and living a multi-millionaire lifestyle of the 1%.

For Elvis, I can only surmise that writing for Mother Jones, wearing a crappy sports cap, and not being on the Bilderberg Group's yacht club makes him a working class hero. Oh, and an intellectual. Playing a fictional working class persona and speaking like one is more important than facts. Which I guess is the equivalent of Roseanne being a working class intellectual because she portrayed a working middle class mom on television for years and still talks like one even though she is worth 80 million.

brekin » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:47 pm wrote:Michael Moore, great unwashed cloaking device aside, is worth 50 million dollers. He's part of the elite even if he wears sweaters that have Garfield printed on them and Garfield sleeping on them. Like Jones, he's in the business of crying doomsday, the industry of selling dissent, that's how he makes the donuts. Can a multi-millionaire still speak truth to power? Perhaps, but its doubtful when his brand is reactionary propaganda and that is how he makes his money.


brekin » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:47 pm wrote:
Elvis » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:27 pm wrote:
brekin wrote:Michael Moore, great unwashed cloaking device aside, is worth 50 million dollers. He's part of the elite

To say that Michael Moore is part of the elite is ridiculous. Moore doesn't get invited to Warren Buffet's summer flings, Bilderberg meetings, Bohemian Grove parties or Council on Foreign Relations membership. He gets thrown out of GM stockholders' meetings. Michael Moore is a working class intellectual who happened to make a lot of money with his (usually good) documentaries. By no means does earning $50M buy Moore a seat at the grownups table. By that measure, Lady Gaga should have a seat on the Bilderberg Executive Committee. (Which might not at all be a bad idea.)
On edit: By the way, Michael Moore worked very hard to earn that money.

Sorry bro, you have to leave your heroes at the door at RI. Moore is in the 1% by income. That isn't working class, and he's hardly an intellectual (but that is another story). That he got filthy rich off of his anti-capitalist stunts and films should make him more suspect than those who go in to the cabal meetings through the front door. And by the way, Trump worked very hard to earn his money to. Cry me a polluted river.

Moores second home where he worries and intellectualizes for the working class as he counts the money from his stocks in Boeing, Haliburton, Honeywell and Pfizer.

Image
Michael Moore’s $2M hypocrite house: film director lives like the 1% he condemns
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comme ... rite-house
After Lying About His Wealth on National TV, Michael Moore Admits He's A One Percenter
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/noe ... admits-hes


brekin wrote:
Elvis wrote:
brekin wrote:Sorry bro, you have to leave your heroes at the door at RI.

Sorry sister, you have to leave your assumptions about who my heroes are at the door. Your breezy assumption is wrong.
Editor of Mother Jones. Not an intellectual. Right, okay.
A big house! OMG! Next he'll be setting U.S. economic policy!
Moore's mother was a secretary, his father an auto assembly line worker. Trump started with $200M from his father. The comparison is ludicrous.

First, I'm not a sister, but a bro.
Second, you have said nothing to refute that Moore is elite/1%.
That "big house" is more commonly called a mansion and is in an elite neighborhood as different demographicly from Flint as possible. And he is literally profiting handsomely from the very corporations and systems he rails about. As well as profiting from his business of railing against them. That is called being a hypocrite, which is not the same as an intellectual. Both he and Trump are mult-millionaires pretending to speak for the working classes and exposing how the system is corrupt and broken while getting rich off of it. Don't be blinded by the sweats.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:07 am

Karmamatterz, if you're going to use the quote function, do you mind getting straight who actually said which part of what follows the attribution? Because JackRiddler did not "wrote" quite what follows in your post. Do it with the boxes, please. Thanks.

Karmamatterz » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:16 pm wrote:What I’ve been trying to get across to people as I can really only speak for myself is this: I am not a Trump supporter.


I hadn't noticed if you were and I wasn't responding to you.

What many people can’t seem to shake is the binary thinking. The hysterics that are infecting so many people seem to make them unable to realize that perhaps there are some people who find the idea of the CIA, FBI, NSA etc having any say in who are elected officials should be rather unsavory. It’s actually revolting.


So what's your point? That what, I don't? I find the existence of these entities revolting, and I daresay this board is half-predicated on the idea that they are revolting by definition and should not exist.

I don't think you read what I wrote above, or dada's response. But that's okay.

I could care less that it’s Trump.


That's because you're paying attention to the one evil and letting this one fly right over your head. But maybe you're not one of the Mexicans, Muslims, black people, women, minimum wage slaves or others who are going to get hit first, I don't know.

In any case, what dada said, and what I said above. No one here's cheering for or supporting the CIA/etc. to depose anyone, and no one here gets a choice about what the CIA/etc. does. And therefore no one here's responsible for it either.

No matter how much many of us think Trump is awful and could really make a mess of things, he was elected.


After a fashion, sure. Given the Republican voter suppression machinery created and refined over recent decades. Given the corporate media star system that awarded the nomination to Trump by brute coverage prior to any primaries. Given the dead hand of 1787, etc. So? He was elected, in part illegitimately, and he can be brought down, by entirely legitimate means. And that is what I hope: That he and his NYNJ gangster friends and his corporate pirate-billionaire cabinet and his sick Christofanatic allies will be exposed for the criminals they are -- and yes, it's too bad that did not happen with the predecessor criminals, I agree, but that's no reason to miss this rare golden opportunity. His toxic actions and his evil life will catch up with him, the opposition will become great enough -- and I mean the democratic opposition in the street, not the shenanigans of the spooks -- he will become politically unsustainable, and he will be thrown out of office. Peacefully. Or else he'll weather it. Why should you not wish for that democratic and legitimate outcome, that this fucking beast should fall?

And if instead he is done in by the CIA etc., okay fine, that's not good, but it also won't be anything that I wished for, or caused to happen, will it now? And the danger of it isn't a reason not to fight against the coming-to-power of white nationalist fascist war monger Christofanatics who want to watch the world burn, is it now?

The danger of it, in fact, is minuscule. Whether by incompetence or some byzantine plan (I'm betting on incompetence in this case), the Russian influence bullshit is pretty much Trump's best lifeline. It's the thing that makes him look most honest and (implausibly enough) like a real victim. It's a distraction from the actual election rigging by voter suppression and corporate media star system. It's a distraction from the incredibly dangerous and bellicose and militaristic stance the Trump regime is intentionally producing.

And it's highly unlikely to work. It's a very dangerous move by irresponsible spooks and Clintonist operators that could taint opposition to Trump -- exactly what we see attempted in miniature on this shit-show of a thread started by someone who actually is a Trump supporter.

Okay? Thanks.

I’m curious how far you would be willing to go to get the president removed? To say the president should be brought down because he can be is creepy and fascist.


See above. Large-scale protests, general strike, civil disobedience, non-violent rendering impossible of business as usual. You know, the kind of thing that actually works.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The CIA is seriously dangerous.

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:24 am

km artlu » Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:54 pm wrote:the anti-Trump social justice mob


Fuck off.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby km artlu » Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:48 am

Fuck off.


I didn't say they're wrong about Trump, you arrogant cunt. I said they're a mob and that they trade in social justice.
km artlu
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby PufPuf93 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:03 am

There is an internet poll on the msn.com homepage now.

I realize that internet polls are worthless.

------------------

Whom do you trust more: President Trump or U.S. intelligence agencies?

President Trump 30%

The intelligence agencies 43%

I trust them both 10%

I distrust both 17%

Total responses 669.706 votes

-----------------

I voted I distrust both and guess that almost everyone at RI would share such an opinion.

I am not optimistic about what is occurring and what are going to be surprises; of course one does not want the CIA to choose the POTUS.

Trump is running cover for even bigger assholes than himself even if he himself is so stuck on his ego to realize that fact.

Trump is already far in the zone where no one halfway decent will join his "team" and Trump's own frustration make him more unpredictable and probably spiteful.

Pence is no great replacement. Neither is Ryan.

The Democratic leadership (and HRC the presumed choice of the CIA) could easily have avoided this scenario and not had Trump as POTUS but for their own hubris and how many Americans are so easily led astray.

There is probably much less substance to the idea that Russians controlled the election and control Trump.

Leaks from the intelligence agencies and pieced together bits of "data" by the media - lions and tigers and bears.

The instability of the US is eerily real and no good is likely to result. The divides between people are real however engineered.

I wondered here at RI months ago who would be the new names which would become so familiar: Bannon, Conway, Miller, Spicer.
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby Nordic » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:33 am

For those questioning M Moore's hysteria? Just check out his twitter feed. Bring xanax, it might be contagious.

He and Keith Olbermann need to get a room.

https://mobile.twitter.com/MMFlint/stat ... 3992960000

Tell ur Senators &House members NOW u want em 2 cease all business til they appoint a Special Committee on Trump & the Russians 202-225-3121


:eeyaa

To answer other concerns, i.e. The new title of the thread: It's a rhetorical question. How could that not be obvious.

It occurred to me today, as I pondered the possibilities, something we used to enjoy here before we got all hateful with each other, that perhaps this has played out exactly the way it was planned: so that Big Daddy Deep State could protect us from ourselves and just get rid of those tiresome bogus elections. Daddy knows best. Hel, it works GREAT for China, so why not here?

Consider: the Deep State's official candidate. Hillary Clinton and her team, wanted Trump to be the opponent.

We were told Trump had no chance in hell of winning. Setting us up for abrupt outrage and shock (people were openly sobbing everywhere).

Now comes step 3. Whip up the masses into a hysterically angry mob of biblical proportions, so they will accept any outcome AS LONG AS IT GETS RID OF TRUMP.

Step 4. The Deep State heroically removes Trump from office. Before people realize the gravity of this, they start that much-desired war with Russia, everybody's attention is diverted, and Michelle Obama (or whoever the replacement is) wins massive support to lead the country using the same "shock and awe" propaganda techniques that turned everybody - even Michael Moore - into CIA-fellating idiots.



(Actually this would be a good plot for a new Batman movie.).

I'm not saying this is the case. I'm pondering. Nothing surprise me.

Even SLAD would enjoy a CIA presidency and the official end of Democracy if it meant TRUMP WAS GONE.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby OP ED » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:39 am

Personally I love it.

The liberals foaming at the mouth over someone who is better at liberalism than they are. The intelligence agencies upset at foreign influence of probably illegitimate right wing government.

The confirmation that ridiculously inept sorcery can influence international history.

The confirmation that our species is truly doomed. This is only plausible explanation for the division in the deep state.

It's like Santa Claus is real and he really liked how I sat on his lap this year.
Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore:
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.

:: ::
S.H.C.R.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby Nordic » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:39 am

Oh and one more thing. I'm not alt-right. I'm alt-left. Why aren't you? Why isn't everyone with an above-average IQ.

Oh right. Emotions. That's how they fuck with your head. Bernays 101.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: The CIA is seriously dangerous.

Postby Nordic » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:41 am

JackRiddler » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:24 pm wrote:
km artlu » Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:54 pm wrote:the anti-Trump social justice mob


Fuck off.

.



And that's why we can't have nice things.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Should the CIA choose our President?

Postby Nordic » Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:50 am

It's funny because I was just perusing the news and there are all these warnings about Trump's looming authoritarianism.

It took me a while to realize that in life, on a personal level, our fears create our reality. A fear will create the very thing we fear. So how to let go? Subject for another thread, but that's what's happening here.

Fear of Trump is going to create the very thing people fear in him. Total authoritarianism.

"Just convince people that they're under attack" and they'll let you do anything. Start a war. Repeat lies over and over, keeping them simple, until people believe them. Russia hacked the election Russia hacked the election Russia hacked the election....

Nazi propaganda at its most basic.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests