Where Did the Towers Go? Implications of the Forensic Study and Its Cover Up
Published on Jun 5, 2017
An updated version of a film about the research of Dr Judy Wood. It also discusses the cover up of the evidence and the implications of this cover up.
Belligerent Savant » Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:31 pm wrote:StarmanSkye » Thu Nov 24, 2011 3:27 pm wrote:I recommend this vid from about a year ago as a highly informative overview of the Cold Fusion controversy, making the case for over 20 years of research results produced by a large and growing body of scientists and technicians from a wide range of hosting agencies, from academia and corporations (ie., Toyota) to foreign governments, utility companies and militaries, demonstrating production of tritium and excess energy up to 100 times greater than that expected according to conventional notions of chemical engineering.
Among other scientific critiques of the controversy this vid examines MIT's highly-publicized critical review condemning LENR (low energy nuclear reaction which Ponns & Fleischmann claimed to discover in 1989) which under independant review it was found that MIT researchers falsified their data claiming 'no evidence' to support their denunciation of Pons and Fleischmann.
Stephen E. Jones (who later became a "911 truther" and has the makings of a suspect character) discredited the cold fusion research/results of Pons and Fleischman, reportedly preventing the 2 scientists from patenting their process.
This video, found elsewhere here in RI, posits that a form of LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction), or Directed Energy Weapon, was directed towards the Twin Towers (and immediate surrounding area) to turn the towers to "dust" (and nearby parked cars to ruined shells, even though work papers in the same area remained undamaged.)
(the video references Pons & Fleischmann, Mallove and Jones, and their respective relationship with cold fusion/LENR technology, starting around the 52 minute mark)
Additional bread crumbs:
From ever-reliable Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleischma ... experiment
Eugene Mallove's involvement in Cold Fusion/LENR, and his murder in 2004:
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/07/the ... te-energy/
Stephen E. Jones, again via Wiki:
“Could increased cell tower, increased DMF… how can that cause a fire?
“Well, it creates field effects in a region… “
Serious Unintended Consequences of Modern Technology - Wildfires Discussion
(w Dr Judy Wood)
Published on Aug 10, 2018
This is a very interesting radio show interviewing Dr Judy Wood who is hosted by Richard Syrett of 'Conspiracy Unlimited'.
[…]Dr. Judy Wood (@20:10 about the WTC on 9/11): In John Hutchison’s work, if something levitated it would be building up a charge faster than it could discharge, and the thing would get kind of destroyed.
Richard Syrett: Any idea where you would have to place a weapon like that in order to achieve that effect?
JW: If it’s a field effect, you need two things: You need a static field - something like John Hutchinson is working with, you need a static field and, what he does, you interfere radio frequency signals within that static field. You can create that static field various ways, or maybe the hurricane (Hurricane Erin) that was nearby did that. We know that there was electrical effects from it because there was dry thunder. And then just interfere various radio frequency signals, like microwave or whatnot, and there you go.
RS: Where did this technology come from? Was it borne out of the Strategic Defense Initiative?
JW: I think it has been around even longer than that. You could argue that it’s talked about in The Bible, the walls of Jericho come down…
RS: Ahh, yes, yes. Well, the Ark of the Covenant, perhaps it was a giant capacitor.
JW: Yep, exactly. There’s various things that people used to be more observant and they would observe these things and understand them. But, they also were taught not to observe, like even to this day, in general, people don’t understand what tornadoes are or what hurricanes are. They’re taught that tornadoes are just air that’s swirling around real fast, not realizing the anti-gravity effects of it. It’s a weird field effect, and why does it cut off buildings in a straight line? It’s peculiar, and that’s what happened on 9/11: There’s a straight line across the north wing of Building 4, and that reminded me so much of the aftermath of a tornado I saw as a child. Could they have weaponized tornadoes? You bet! With the same kind of physics!!
RS: What role could the hurricane played on 9/11?
JW: I like to talk about the evidence because it speaks more loudly than anything because you can’t argue with that, and we know that something turned the building, most of the building, into the dust in mid-air; and that right there is proof, absolute proof, that a technology exists that can do that - because it was done. That’s no speculation.It happened, therefore a technology that can make it happen must exist.
Richard Syrett: “What do you imagine they are doing with that technology now?”
JW: Oo-ooh… Lots of things!
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Arthur C. Clarke, 1973
JW: Yep, exactly. There’s various things that people used to be more observant and they would observe these things and understand them. But, they also were taught not to observe, like even to this day, in general, people don’t understand what tornadoes are or what hurricanes are. They’re taught that tornadoes are just air that’s swirling around real fast, not realizing the anti-gravity effects of it.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests