Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
liminalOyster » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:42 pm wrote:Media is running with notion that he was murdered by "a serial killer" or "hired killer." I darkly lol-ed. As per latter, well you dont say......? I will be curious if Seth is soon "discovered" to have had say some sort of gambling debt. If so will be interesting (and sad) when his parents find their allies jumping ship.
Seth Rich Murder: Likely a Serial Killer, Not a Robbery
Forensic-psychology experts with the Profiling Project spent three months trying to confirm or debunk conspiracy theories about Democratic National Committee emails and WikiLeaks.
A serial killer is likely behind the murder of North Carolina Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, according to forensic-psychology students and instructors, who spent three months investigating the homicide. Those researchers, who volunteer at the Profiling Project, an independent group, published their findings on Tuesday in an 83-page report.
The Profiling Project, based in Arlington, Virginia, consists of around 20 volunteers who are current and former George Washington University forensic-psychology graduate students and instructors. The report states that Rich’s July 2016 “death does not appear to be a random homicide” or “a robbery gone bad,” as police had suggested. Instead, the report says, the “death was more likely committed by a hired killer or serial murderer,” and that the killer is likely still at large.
“The person folks [should be] looking for and considering isn’t a robber who kills, but really is a killer, and maybe a killer that doesn’t rob,” says Kevin Doherty, a recent George Washington University graduate and one of the volunteers with the Profiling Project. “The fact that this person has gotten away with it shows a level of proficiency.”
http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murde ... ect-627634
Those researchers, who volunteer at the Profiling Project, an independent group, published their findings on Tuesday in an 83-page report.
We were unable to ascertain if Seth used drugs, but he did seem to be a heavy drinker. His Reddit profile indicates that he had in-depth knowledge of sports betting metrics and may have engaged in sports betting. Reportedly, in his last Facebook posting prior being shot, Seth posted “I have family and friends on both sides of the law” which may indicate an understanding of the criminal system.
Seth posted “I have family and friends on both sides of the law” which may indicate an understanding of the criminal system.
JackRiddler » Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:22 pm wrote:Seth posted “I have family and friends on both sides of the law” which may indicate an understanding of the criminal system.
which may indicate nothing the fuck at all.
liminalOyster » Tue Jun 20, 2017 9:38 pm wrote:Just created a Google Alert for +"Seth Rich" +gambling. Will report back if unfolds as I predict.
edit: Don't want to create more clutter so editing this one. The report is pretty much stupid and similar to an undergraduate honors thesis in quality, in a nutshell. It operates on the assumption that Seth not being executed rules out various theories. IOW, he can't have been the leaker, for instance, because the killer didn't simply ensure he was finished off. No space for - why might he have been shot in this manner by someone seeking to make "an example" out of him. Much less, god knows, for - if someone in the MPD had been in on the crime, could they have gamed the events that followed and why might they have wanted to do so?
A Lobbyist’s “Report” About Seth Rich’s Death Is Just More Fodder for Conspiracy Theorists
Written by Benjamin Freed | Published on June 20, 2017
Apparently, neither the family of slain Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich nor the police investigating his murder can get more than a few weeks’ break before getting dragged back into the conspiracy theories swirling around his killing last July. The latest: a “preliminary report” released Tuesday by a research group established by Washington lobbyist Jack Burkman, which claims that Rich’s early-morning slaying was carried out by a “hired killer or serial murderer.”
The 45-page report—the product of Burkman’s Profiling Project made up of forensics students at George Washington University—backs up its conclusions on a series of hunches, rather than actual evidence. More troubling than that is the potential effect it will have in undermining the public credibility of the ongoing investigation by DC’s Metropolitan Police Department, which has stated numerous times that Rich’s death appears to be the result of an attempted robbery that escalated into violence.
Here’s what is known, according to previous police statements: Rich was shot about 4:19 AM last July 10 outside his home in the Bloomingdale neighborhood and was taken to a hospital, where he died of his wounds. While Rich’s wallet, watch, and other belongings were on his body, bruises on his hands, knees, and face were consistent with signs of a physical struggle, as was a tear to his watch band. But the shooting went down in a poorly lit area and without much coverage by surveillance cameras, making Rich’s killing difficult to investigate.
Unfortunately, the combination of Rich’s employer, an embarrassing dump of Democratic Party emails by Wikileaks, and a tough crime scene was ripe for an emerging political wing made up of people easily convinced by unfounded conspiracy theories. Burkman says he does not subscribe to the theory that claims Rich was gunned down because he was Wikileaks’ source. Rather, he has made equally unfounded claims that Rich was killed as cover for the Russian government’s hacking of DNC computer systems.
Today’s document actually tries to knock down Burkman’s guess, saying it’s unlikely Rich was killed at hands of Kremlin goons “unless a toxin was introduced into Seth.” (It makes the same argument to discredit the claim that a DNC hit squad did it.) But even after months of reviewing media reports, Rich’s social media profiles, and the location of the killing, this privately financed and conducted report is a series of guesses that is more likely to stoke the conspiracies rather than put them to bed.
Why is that? Because the police investigation is still ongoing, and the department is not going to release any evidence into the public while it continues to investigate Rich’s death. But the police are in a tricky spot here. Showing their work before the case is closed would likely damage the investigation, while their official—and correct—refusal to comment is manna for the conspiracy theorists. This was the situation last month, when Fox News Channel and local Fox station WTTG ran reports citing a private investigator named Rod Wheeler, who claimed to have seen evidence that Rich was in communication with Wikileaks before he died. And even though the stories quickly fell apart when it was revealed that Wheeler had just repeated a Fox News staffer’s guesses back to her, it fueled the amateur sleuthing for days both online and on television, where Fox News host Sean Hannity spent the better part of a week stoking his empty guesses. Meanwhile, the police had to try to shout above the conspiracy noise to remind people that it is investigating Rich’s death as a homicide that resulted from an attempted robbery, and that murder investigations are often be long, painful, and unsatisfying processes.
Burkman might be on a different wavelength than Hannity, but he comes from the same spectrum. The lobbyist, who’s also said he’s offering a $105,000 reward for information that solves the Rich case, recently sued the District to release the police department’s initial ballistics report and a medical examiner’s report. And at a press conference Tuesday to release his report, he added that Rich’s death must not be a “street crime” because of the rewards offered by him, DC police, and other entities.
“We know these aren’t street crimes,” he said. “For God’s sake, you’ve got $340,000 in reward money. If this was a street crime people would be all over that.”
In other words, absence of evidence is the basis for one’s desired conclusion, and there’s no new evidence from Burkman’s Profiling Project.
Amid this, it’s easy to lose sight of Rich’s family, who once stood alongside Burkman when he offered his initial reward but have since distanced themselves from the lobbyist. A spokesman for the family, Brad Bauman, says the Riches have nothing to do with today’s stunt and would prefer the public to follow the police investigation.
“The Rich family was not provided a copy of the preliminary report, never saw the report or was otherwise consulted in the preparation of the report,” Bauman says. “As noted, by the report’s own methodology, ‘The Profiling Project was given no special access to any materials, evidence or persons and due to case sensitivity, conducted only informal, limited interviews. Given that fact, the family hopes that the general public takes the findings at face value—valuable experience in research collection and report writing for students at George Washington University but in no way should take any findings contained within as new, credible or otherwise lending credence to conspiracy theories surrounding the circumstances of Seth’s death. We further hope that this doesn’t continue to impede the Metropolitan Police Department’s ability to find the killers and give folks who might have information leading to their arrest cover to stay silent.”
https://www.washingtonian.com/2017/06/2 ... theorists/
NEWSWEAK wrote:A serial killer is likely behind the murder of North Carolina Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, according to forensic-psychology students and instructors
Media is running with notion that he was murdered by "a serial killer" or "hired killer."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests