Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
The Consul » Thu Jul 20, 2017 5:57 pm wrote:Old friend years ago took “an experimental vow of silence.” He stopped talking. It was good he did, more or less, because he was in this process of “pulling off the wallpaper from what we really are” and would ask questions like, who do you think about when your masturbate and why didn’t we come up with something better than god if we are afraid to die? Maybe it was because he almost died of sepsis after a rare undiagnosed disease ravaged his body. He came to and his family was around his bed weeping, some were out in the hall, weeping. I expected to enter the room and maybe get in a farewell, a man eye to man eye goodbye. When I entered room 202 he was sitting up in the bed, all 80 pounds of him, his eyes shining like black diamonds.
I gave him a head check and he spoke:
“What’s weird is I had to go through all this shit to be this glad to be this alive and there is a chance I might never feel this amazing again. It’s beyond love. So soak it up.”
There was an aura in the room. A long shut door had been opened.
It was pretty much then he gave up speaking. After a while not talking was insufficient. Hearing words was too much. So up to the old mining cabin he went with little more than a book I loaned him, and the first time I visited under the promise of silence the only sign of words was that dog eared copy of “Freedom from the Known” by Krishnamurti. We fished, we hiked, took a leaky boat out on Cliff Lake. I swore once for a lost hook, and he gave me the evil eye, not for swearing, but uttering. When It came time to leave I pulled out the dented flask and he took a swig of bourbon and handed the Krishnamurti book to take back down the mountain. As I took it from his hand he looked at the cover as if he was saying goodbye to language itself.
He was trying to escape his conditioning, the feeling of being trapped at the bottom of a dark sea of lies. At least, that’s what I figured. He never said why he wouldn’t say.
There is a way away, but it cannot be motivated by any fear. He told me this in a dream, which I told him about and he looked at me the same way he looked at the book when I took it from him. You can take your piece out of the puzzle but it doesn’t change the puzzle. After a while the empty space becomes invisible.
You can take up the penny whistle like he did, and lose yourself in Irish reels. You can unwrap the onion of your mind and experience the nothing that isn’t there. The birds at dawn are all we need to hear. And as the light comes up and the sky turns silver, in that instant where everything seems to stop, everything simply shuts the fuck up, there’s a nano chance of being un-owned, un-owning and unknown.
minime » Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:22 pm wrote:DrEvil » Thu Jul 20, 2017 3:13 pm wrote:I would pick being really smart so I could figure out the algorithm for Lotto and get rich.![]()
(That's a real quote from a real idiot).
@minime: You're not a superpower, you're a random guy on the internet spouting quasi-philosophical bullshit and deluding yourself into thinking it's wisdom, just like the rest of us.
In other words "Stop humping the laser".
Random. Spouting. Deluding. Such rhetoric.
DrEvil » Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:01 pm wrote:
What can I say, I like my language comprehensible and human-readable.
Rory » Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:39 pm wrote:Tentacle porn fetishist cum journalist caught lying in his anti Russian propaganda
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/ ... -with.html
I was just looking for research
DrEvil » Fri Jul 21, 2017 3:28 pm wrote:Readable by humans without having to guess or interpret the meaning. Which I apparently just failed at.
It's a nerd joke playing on "machine-readable", meaning that it has to be formatted in a specific way for the computer to be able to parse the data and get something useful out of it.
In plain english: I fucking hate it when people can't be arsed to just spell out what they mean and instead go all vague and cryptic on people. I've found that it's usually a sign of someone trying really hard (and failing) to look smart.
A Tweet to Kurt Eichenwald, a Strobe and a Seizure. Now, an Arrest.
By CECILIA KANGMARCH 17, 2017
The journalist Kurt Eichenwald at his home in Dallas, Tex., on Friday. Credit Brandon Thibodeaux for The New York Times
WASHINGTON — When the journalist Kurt Eichenwald opened an animated image sent to him on Twitter in December, the message “You deserve a seizure for your posts” appeared in capital letters along with a blinding strobe light. Mr. Eichenwald, who has epilepsy, immediately suffered a seizure.
On Friday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said it had arrested John Rayne Rivello, 29, at his home in Salisbury, Md., and accused him of sending the electronic file. The agency charged Mr. Rivello with criminal cyberstalking with the intent to kill or cause bodily harm.
The charge could carry a prison sentence of up to 10 years, according to the United States district attorney in Dallas, who is prosecuting the case.
The unusual case has shown how online tools can be deployed as weapons capable of physical harm. The F.B.I. and the Dallas police led the investigation into Mr. Rivello, and the police said he sent the strobe light knowing that it was likely to lead Mr. Eichenwald, who has publicly discussed his epilepsy, into a seizure.
Steven Lieberman, Mr. Eichenwald’s lawyer, has argued that the use of the strobe light in a GIF, or moving graphic, was akin to sending an explosive or poison in the mail.
“This electronic message was no different than a bomb sent in the mail or anthrax sent in an envelope,” said Mr. Lieberman, who is working on the case as a pro bono service. “It triggers a physical effect.” (Mr. Lieberman represents The New York Times as outside counsel, and Mr. Eichenwald was a reporter for The Times from 1986 to 2006.)
That comparison makes Mr. Eichenwald’s case different from other claims of harmful attacks using social media. Lawsuits involving stalking and bullying on the internet have focused on how online content, such as disparaging and abusive messages and pictures, can harm victims emotionally and even increase the risk of suicide. But with this case, Mr. Rivello is said to have designed the attack specifically around the victim’s medical condition.
“This is an interesting and unique case in that there are lots of online attacks that can have physical consequences, such as an attack on an electrical grid or the control of air traffic control,” said Vivek Krishnamurthy, an assistant director at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School. “But this is distinguishable because it is a targeted physical attack that was personal, using a plain-Jane tool.”
Investigators found evidence of the plan to attack Mr. Eichenwald from a search of Mr. Rivello’s Twitter account, the Justice Department said in a statement. After obtaining a search warrant for Mr. Rivello’s social media account, investigators found direct messages to other Twitter users about Mr. Eichenwald, including one that read, “I hope this sends him into a seizure.”
Other Twitter messages from Mr. Rivello included one that read, “I know he has epilepsy.”
Investigators also searched one of Mr. Rivello’s digital accounts and found a screenshot of Mr. Eichenwald’s Wikipedia page that had been altered to show a fake date of death of Dec. 16, 2016, the day after the strobe light attack, the Justice Department said. The digital account also contained screenshots from epilepsy.com with a list of commonly reported epilepsy seizure triggers.
The daily Bits newsletter will keep you updated on the latest from Silicon Valley and the technology industry, plus exclusive analysis from our reporters and editors.
The attack drew attention from the news media as thousands of Twitter users witnessed the sequence of events unfold live on the social media site.
Mr. Eichenwald, 55, who has about 318,000 followers on Twitter and has written four books, including “The Informant,” had been critical of Donald J. Trump throughout his presidential campaign. Mr. Eichenwald suspected that the attacker, who operated under the pseudonym “@jew_goldstein” on Twitter, was a supporter of Mr. Trump. Twitter has since suspended the account.
Late in the evening on Dec. 15, Mr. Eichenwald went to his home office in Dallas and saw that @jew_goldstein had replied to a Twitter post with a GIF. When Mr. Eichenwald clicked on the file, the strobe light triggered the seizure, his lawyer said. Mr. Eichenwald fell to the ground.
His wife, Theresa, found him on the floor and saw the Twitter post on his computer screen. She called 911 and then replied on Twitter: “@jew_goldstein This is his wife, you caused a seizure. I have your information and have called the police to report the assault.”
Mr. Eichenwald was incapacitated for several days, lost feeling in his left hand and had trouble speaking for several weeks, according to his lawyer.
Soon after, he contacted the Dallas district attorney’s office. In state court, Mr. Eichenwald’s lawyer filed for permission to serve a subpoena of Twitter to gain access to the account for @jew_goldstein. The social media company indicated it would cooperate, which drew protest from an anonymous “John Doe” filing that was intended to quash the subpoena.
Investigators would not say how they tracked down Mr. Rivello. Court documents were not immediately available. Mr. Rivello will be transferred to Dallas, where Mr. Eichenwald lives, to appear before the District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Mr. Eichenwald used Twitter on Friday to thank officials for their work on his case. He said that since the Dec. 15 message, 40 more accounts have sent him strobe light images.
“Details of their cases are with the FBI. Stop sending them,” he wrote on Twitter.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/tech ... rrest.html
seemslikeadream » Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:20 pm wrote:A Tweet to Kurt Eichenwald, a Strobe and a Seizure. Now, an Arrest.
By CECILIA KANGMARCH 17, 2017
The journalist Kurt Eichenwald at his home in Dallas, Tex., on Friday. Credit Brandon Thibodeaux for The New York Times
WASHINGTON — When the journalist Kurt Eichenwald opened an animated image sent to him on Twitter in December, the message “You deserve a seizure for your posts” appeared in capital letters along with a blinding strobe light. Mr. Eichenwald, who has epilepsy, immediately suffered a seizure.
On Friday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said it had arrested John Rayne Rivello, 29, at his home in Salisbury, Md., and accused him of sending the electronic file. The agency charged Mr. Rivello with criminal cyberstalking with the intent to kill or cause bodily harm.
The charge could carry a prison sentence of up to 10 years, according to the United States district attorney in Dallas, who is prosecuting the case.
The unusual case has shown how online tools can be deployed as weapons capable of physical harm. The F.B.I. and the Dallas police led the investigation into Mr. Rivello, and the police said he sent the strobe light knowing that it was likely to lead Mr. Eichenwald, who has publicly discussed his epilepsy, into a seizure.
Steven Lieberman, Mr. Eichenwald’s lawyer, has argued that the use of the strobe light in a GIF, or moving graphic, was akin to sending an explosive or poison in the mail.
“This electronic message was no different than a bomb sent in the mail or anthrax sent in an envelope,” said Mr. Lieberman, who is working on the case as a pro bono service. “It triggers a physical effect.” (Mr. Lieberman represents The New York Times as outside counsel, and Mr. Eichenwald was a reporter for The Times from 1986 to 2006.)
That comparison makes Mr. Eichenwald’s case different from other claims of harmful attacks using social media. Lawsuits involving stalking and bullying on the internet have focused on how online content, such as disparaging and abusive messages and pictures, can harm victims emotionally and even increase the risk of suicide. But with this case, Mr. Rivello is said to have designed the attack specifically around the victim’s medical condition.
“This is an interesting and unique case in that there are lots of online attacks that can have physical consequences, such as an attack on an electrical grid or the control of air traffic control,” said Vivek Krishnamurthy, an assistant director at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School. “But this is distinguishable because it is a targeted physical attack that was personal, using a plain-Jane tool.”
Investigators found evidence of the plan to attack Mr. Eichenwald from a search of Mr. Rivello’s Twitter account, the Justice Department said in a statement. After obtaining a search warrant for Mr. Rivello’s social media account, investigators found direct messages to other Twitter users about Mr. Eichenwald, including one that read, “I hope this sends him into a seizure.”
Other Twitter messages from Mr. Rivello included one that read, “I know he has epilepsy.”
Investigators also searched one of Mr. Rivello’s digital accounts and found a screenshot of Mr. Eichenwald’s Wikipedia page that had been altered to show a fake date of death of Dec. 16, 2016, the day after the strobe light attack, the Justice Department said. The digital account also contained screenshots from epilepsy.com with a list of commonly reported epilepsy seizure triggers.
The daily Bits newsletter will keep you updated on the latest from Silicon Valley and the technology industry, plus exclusive analysis from our reporters and editors.
The attack drew attention from the news media as thousands of Twitter users witnessed the sequence of events unfold live on the social media site.
Mr. Eichenwald, 55, who has about 318,000 followers on Twitter and has written four books, including “The Informant,” had been critical of Donald J. Trump throughout his presidential campaign. Mr. Eichenwald suspected that the attacker, who operated under the pseudonym “@jew_goldstein” on Twitter, was a supporter of Mr. Trump. Twitter has since suspended the account.
Late in the evening on Dec. 15, Mr. Eichenwald went to his home office in Dallas and saw that @jew_goldstein had replied to a Twitter post with a GIF. When Mr. Eichenwald clicked on the file, the strobe light triggered the seizure, his lawyer said. Mr. Eichenwald fell to the ground.
His wife, Theresa, found him on the floor and saw the Twitter post on his computer screen. She called 911 and then replied on Twitter: “@jew_goldstein This is his wife, you caused a seizure. I have your information and have called the police to report the assault.”
Mr. Eichenwald was incapacitated for several days, lost feeling in his left hand and had trouble speaking for several weeks, according to his lawyer.
Soon after, he contacted the Dallas district attorney’s office. In state court, Mr. Eichenwald’s lawyer filed for permission to serve a subpoena of Twitter to gain access to the account for @jew_goldstein. The social media company indicated it would cooperate, which drew protest from an anonymous “John Doe” filing that was intended to quash the subpoena.
Investigators would not say how they tracked down Mr. Rivello. Court documents were not immediately available. Mr. Rivello will be transferred to Dallas, where Mr. Eichenwald lives, to appear before the District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Mr. Eichenwald used Twitter on Friday to thank officials for their work on his case. He said that since the Dec. 15 message, 40 more accounts have sent him strobe light images.
“Details of their cases are with the FBI. Stop sending them,” he wrote on Twitter.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/tech ... rrest.html
Mr. Eichenwald used Twitter on Friday to thank officials for their work on his case. He said that since the Dec. 15 message, 40 more accounts have sent him strobe light images.
Senate Intel Chair: ‘The Unmasking Thing Was All Created By Devin Nunes’
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
By ALLEGRA KIRKLAND Published JULY 21, 2017 3:15 PM
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) on Friday accused his counterpart in the House, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), of creating a false narrative about Obama administration national security adviser Susan Rice.
Speaking to CNN after Rice was interviewed by the panel in closed session, Burr said he asked no questions about whether she improperly requested and revealed the identities of U.S. individuals swept up in intelligence reports—an accusation Nunes has made repeatedly.
“The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes, and I’ll wait to go through our full evaluation to see if there was anything improper that happened,” Burr told CNN. “But clearly there were individuals unmasked. Some of that became public which it’s not supposed to, and our business is to understand that, and explain it.”
With an assist from the White House, the House Intelligence chairman in March embarked on a one-man crusade to accuse Rice of improperly unmasking the identities of members of Trump’s campaign in intelligence reports. Though President Donald Trump said he believed Rice’s actions broke the law, bipartisan lawmakers who viewed the same classified reports from which Nunes drew his conclusions said they saw no evidence of wrongdoing. National security experts also told TPM that it was within Rice’s purview as national security adviser to request that names be unmasked as she tried to determine the extent of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.
Nunes ended up temporarily stepping aside from the House investigation after ethics watchdogs accused him of improperly disclosing classified information in his public statements about Rice. He recently told CNN that he remains fully “read-in” to the House probe and never formally recused himself, however.
“I can do whatever I want, I’m the chairman of the committee,” Nunes said.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/ ... -narrative
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests