My point is, for instance, I dont agree with all of Hopsickers views, but I dont necessarily throw out all his research, far from it. Same with other people, who may or may not be disinfo, which mixes fact with fiction. Its up to the mature and discerning person to way up whats valuable, and whats not. Without actually experiencing something, the rest is just hearsay (in terms of potential for tampering or chinese whispers), no matter what the source. Laura Loomer appears to have actually gone to Campos' house, and reported what she saw. Im aware that she may have an agenda.
(As an aside, I see both alt-left and alt-right being generated and now self generated memes that are focused on, so they can create more chaos/polarization when they attack each other. Rather than the majority of disenfranchised on either side who are reasonable and actually seeing what they have in common, with mature dialogue, vs the (sometimes literally) black & white thinking, that is promoted by BS artists on either side. Interesting how the increasing WTO protests got nixed quickly back in the late 90s, with the new enemy of terrorism, that the status quo imo, used to keep people distracted. )
AJ is very destructive hot mess and panders to a particular audience, and I do not agree with much of his outlook. He has an agenda, I also suspect his initial Bohemian Grove video may have been a cover for him to become a constructed vanguard/pied piper for a certain group. So yeah, I'm fully aware of Bannon and AJ etc.. also fully aware of biases of others on the "left", who I traditionally identify/identified with.
I posted the AJ/Paul Watson article, because it linked to alleged real FB accounts. I dont know if they are real or not, but posted in case other perhaps more reliable sources are found.
*So yeah, I will not discuss anymore on the veracity of sources like AJ or Loomer, make up your own mind.*
She does sound like a right piece of work.
