MacCruiskeen » Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:16 pm wrote::ohno:
Give more, Mac.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
MacCruiskeen » Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:07 am wrote:It's no wonder stickdog so rarely posts here, and it's no wonder so many other good people have completely given up on this board.
Anyone else find it kind of funny that on a board about conspiracies, one that actually got pretty well-known, there is now a permanently parked group of people ready to shoot down and mock anyone posting anything that might suggest a conspiracy?
Having not been here in a very long time, and seeing this place with fresh eyes, this kind of sticks out.
I will now be mocked and derided for suggesting there could be a conspiracy involved in a conspiracy forum.
Iamwhomiam » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:01 pm wrote:Fuck it! Nordic, why are you here? By all that is right and holy, you should have been banned long before Canadian_Watcher, you, with your astonishing record of suspensions.
I felt we always got along, at least until I finally called one of your postings out as "Bullshit. Twice in 10 fucking years I've criticized you and held my tongue for more often after reading your perspective. You have nothing at all to offer but criticism of other RI members, so fuck off.
MacCruiskeen » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:57 am wrote:0_0 » Sat Oct 21, 2017 12:04 pm wrote:Yes we assume he murdered a lot of people, but his motive for doing so is currently a mystery. Shooters like that usually have a history of mental illness and/or have alleged ties to terrorist organisations. Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo. And that's just one of the many mysteries in all of this. We'll never know anyway. Seems like showing dominance over the people and letting them know in their gut what's up by the mysteries while denying it on the surface with the official 'normal' narrative.
In reply to the bolded part. We certainly don't. Not all of us.Saying, well he avoided controlled areas when flying and he liked asian women, doesn't do much in the way of explaining that mystery away imo.
Indeed. In fact, what you're saying is a massive understatement. We have been offered precisely nothing in the way of explanation. Just the kind of posthumous defamation, flat-out character-assassination, tinpot psychologizing, and slimily suggestive innuendo that always forms the inscription on any Designated Culprit's gravestone.
stickdog99 » Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:17 am wrote:Spook » 22 Oct 2017 08:07 wrote:And I still can’t work out what was up with the other room with the broken window? You know, the one the Aussie was allegedly staying in at the time of the shooting.....
This little factoid has never been explained. How and when did Paddock gain access to this additional adjoining room? Why did he want or need access to this additional room? What was found in this additional adjoining room? Which window was broken first? When were the two windows broken and with what? What was Paddock's motivation to break a second window? Is there any evidence that he (or someone else) shot out of both windows?
elfismiles » Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:30 am wrote:Over a dozen ambulances staging at the Hooters...
Mandalay Bay Las Vegas Shooting Aftermath perspective from MGM Grand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3JwEbBMt-Q
Iamwhomiam » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:40 am wrote:Online I've not found one photograph showing the room numbers and their relationship to Paddock's suite. But either that graphic is incorrect and the Aussie's telling tall tales about being in the room next door to Paddock's. It is possible the Aussie was in the room to the left of the room adjoining the suite and he then would be correct in claiming he was next door to Paddock's room, if in fact he was.
Brentos » Mon Oct 23, 2017 8:48 pm wrote:82_28 » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:26 am wrote:
There will be a strange memorial built at this location -- that is a given -- it will be saccharine and patriotic. I always wondered, really actually why that part of the strip never got developed. It's the only part of it that doesn't face jack shit. Wondered only for mundane reasons actually. Now I really wonder.
Yeah, an aspect of this event, which is hard to ignore, is the esoteric (even gnostic) angle, that many similar events have in common. I'm not totally convinced on any scenario with this story (including the mega-ritual one), but when there is meaningless slaughter of innocents, with a convenient scapegoat that is a definite red flag.
Nordic » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:30 pm wrote:Iamwhomiam » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:01 pm wrote:Fuck it! Nordic, why are you here? By all that is right and holy, you should have been banned long before Canadian_Watcher, you, with your astonishing record of suspensions.
I felt we always got along, at least until I finally called one of your postings out as "Bullshit. Twice in 10 fucking years I've criticized you and held my tongue for more often after reading your perspective. You have nothing at all to offer but criticism of other RI members, so fuck off.
Oh don't worry, I have fucked off. But very rarely I will come see what is going on here, like today, when I'm stuck at home with a sick family member and bored out of my mind.
It's funny to see that all the reasons so many people have left are still 100% in force. I honestly don't know why the 2 or 3 people trying to keep the spirit alive even bother.
They should fuck off, too. Maybe you should be telling them to fuck off instead of me.
Then you can have the place all to yourself. The way you want it.
stefano » Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:07 pm wrote:Iamwhomiam » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:40 am wrote:Online I've not found one photograph showing the room numbers and their relationship to Paddock's suite. But either that graphic is incorrect and the Aussie's telling tall tales about being in the room next door to Paddock's. It is possible the Aussie was in the room to the left of the room adjoining the suite and he then would be correct in claiming he was next door to Paddock's room, if in fact he was.
Yeah I suspect he was in 32133, that is he actually was next to Paddock's suite, but wrong about the number.
Interestingly if you go to the Mandalay Bay's website now and look at the suites, you can't click on the Vista Suite, which Paddock's was. It flips back to the menu. The 'little' (500 sqf) room next to it is a resort king, with a bathroom, which it seems can be let on its own unlike what I thought earlier.
Iamwhomiam » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:39 pm wrote:I just got jammed up at Mandalay Bay's website trying to figure out how Mandalay Bay has 63 floors! Weird, but it seems they do. Odd, because Paddock's Suite appears to be only a few floors below the building's roof. Click on their Foundation Room.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests