Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[seemslikeadream]

^^ That's quality content, and like totally not OT.

that's your opinion ......sue me

this is TOTALY on topic

women.. children...gravely ill children.... Haitians... Puerto Ricans... people of color ....Muslims.....child victims of abuse.....victims of rape....environmentalists.....veterans.....transgenders....gays.....Native Americans..... 90,000 wild horses...net users..... all agree since we are all sick of winning

A picture taken on July 5, 2017 shows a souvenir kiosk offering among others a drawing depicting Putin holding a baby with the face of President Trump, based upon a propaganda poster showing late soviet leader Joseph Stalin holding a baby, in Moscow (Photo by Mladen Antonov | AFP/Getty Images)

[MacCruiskeen]

^^ That's quality content, and like totally not OT.

that's your opinion ......sue me

this is TOTALY on topic

women.. children...gravely ill children.... Haitians... Puerto Ricans... people of color ....Muslims.....child victims of abuse.....victims of rape....environmentalists.....veterans.....transgenders....gays.....Native Americans..... 90,000 wild horses...net users..... all agree since we are all sick of winning

A picture taken on July 5, 2017 shows a souvenir kiosk offering among others a drawing depicting Putin holding a baby with the face of President Trump, based upon a propaganda poster showing late soviet leader Joseph Stalin holding a baby, in Moscow (Photo by Mladen Antonov | AFP/Getty Images)

How do you get away with it? Very (TOTALY) seriously: Why are you allowed to spam this and every other thread with impunity?

[seemslikeadream]

as always I am sure you will alert the proper authorities

how about the year of spamming this board with personal attacks you made against me?

those didn't shut me up so now your go to phrase is spamming?

YOUR QUOTE

MY on topic response to your link......YOU brought trump into this thread and I WILL reply to it

Once the bete noire of the right, now the actor finds herself even more hated by the left [sic] for refusing to support Hillary Clinton against Donald Trump. She talks about Hollywood sexism, female empowerment and playing Bette Davis

The G2 interview
Susan Sarandon: ‘I thought Hillary was very dangerous. If she'd won, we'd be at war’

Once the bete noire of the right, now the actor finds herself even more hated by the left [sic] for refusing to support Hillary Clinton against Donald Trump. She talks about Hollywood sexism, female empowerment and playing Bette Davis

by Emma Brockes

Guardian, Sunday 26 November 2017, 13.00 GMT

[...]

It is often overlooked that in 2001, Sarandon supported Hillary Clinton’s run for the Senate. There are photos of them posing chummily together, grinning. Then Clinton voted for the war in Iraq and it all went downhill. During the last election, Sarandon supported Bernie Sanders, then wouldn’t support Clinton after she won the nomination, and now all the moderates hate her, to the extent, she says, that she had to change her phone number because people she identifies as Hillary trolls sent her threatening messages. “I got from Hillary people ‘I hope your crotch is grabbed’, ‘I hope you’re raped’. Misogynistic attacks. Recently, I said ‘I stand with Dreamers’ [children brought illegally to the US, whose path to legal citizenship – an Obama-era provision – Trump has threatened to revoke] and that started another wave.”

Wait, from the right?

“No, from the left! ‘How dare you! You who are responsible for this!’”

I ask if she’s aware that Katha Pollitt recently called her an idiot in the New York Review of Books and she looks momentarily taken aback. “I’m flattered,” she says. These people are furious with you, I say.

“Well, that’s why we’re going to lose again if we depend on the DNC [the Democratic National Committee]. Because the amount of denial ... I mean it’s very flattering to think that I, on my own, cost the election. That my little voice was the deciding factor.”

Is it upsetting to be attacked?

“It’s upsetting to me more from the point of view of thinking they haven’t learned. I don’t need to be vindicated.”

[...]

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/n ... -be-at-war

women.. children...gravely ill children.... Haitians... Puerto Ricans... people of color ....Muslims.....child victims of abuse.....victims of rape....environmentalists.....veterans.....transgenders....gays.....Native Americans..... 90,000 wild horses...net users..... all agree since we are all sick of winning

South Korean anti-war activists hold placards showing a caricature of Trump during a rally against South Korea-US joint military exercises on March 1, 2017.(Photo by Jung Yeon-Je | AFP/Getty Images)

[Elvis]

I am just sick to death with the what aboutisms here

[seemslikeadream]

yea so am I...


Sarandon is soooo whataboutisms

trump's got his little finger on the nuke button....but lordy Clinton would have brought us to WAR!

LOCK HER UP

women.. children...gravely ill children.... Haitians... Puerto Ricans... people of color ....Muslims.....child victims of abuse.....victims of rape....environmentalists.....veterans.....transgenders....gays.....Native Americans..... 90,000 wild horses...net users..... all agree since we are all sick of winning

[PufPuf93]

Don't mind me but I would have supported Susan Sarandon for POTUS over Trump or Hillary Clinton.

I wrote in Bernie Sanders for POTUS but would have voted for Clinton had my vote any meaning (California voter).

Bill and Hillary Clinton cost the Democratic party the POTUS in 2000 and 2016 and probably Clinton supporters also cost the 2004 election as well.

If Hillary Clinton had chose not to run for POTUS in 2016, the Democratic party would have found another candidate and probably won easily, especially if against Trump.

It was insane to run a candidate that was from the start so unpopular within the Democratic party but who had the corporate money backers and the DNC firmly in her camp. The folks in control of the Democratic party have proven that they are willing to lose political races top to bottom, not just POTUS, rather than elect more populous and non-corporate backed candidates. I noticed very much that the Clinton campaign said that they did not need the votes from lifetime steady anti-war Democrats (such as myself) and tried to attract former Bush voters.

The Clinton supporters and DNC types are perfectly willing to lose the 2020 POTUS election to retain prominence.

[seemslikeadream]

I don't want Clinton or Bernie to run for president again ...Clinton is not president and never will be president but god almighty we have to keep talking about her as if she was president!! Cause if we do then we are not talking about the traitor in chief

I guess there are some people who think she is really the president


She will NOT be the nominee in 2020


Nothing like waking up the Sunday after Thanksgiving to the leader of the Republican Party strongly endorsing a pedophile but please let's keep talking about Clinton or the failing NYTs

[PufPuf93]

I don't want Clinton or Bernie to run for president again ...Clinton is not president and never will be president but god almighty we have to keep talking about her as if she was president!! Cause if we do then we are not talking about the traitor in chief

I guess there are some people who think she is really the president


She will NOT be the nominee in 2020

We do generally agree.

I also hope that neither Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton run for POTUS in 2020.

I do think that Sanders has more political life and is a positive influence.

We would be better off if Hillary Clinton faded away quietly and her supporters move on to something more positive. Seeing a Russian behind every move is not productive. Thinking Trump will be jailed or impeached (or HRC for that matter) is not that productive. The best we can hope for is probably a Trump resignation but then there is Pence. Time is shortening to get an act together to oust Trump and diminish the GOP in 2020. Look at DU. It is whacked. There is not much sanity out there, folks are so polarized on useless drivel.

So a Clinton is better than GWB or Trump but had the Clintons and their cadre not been directly or indirectly involved in the Democratic leadership and the losing elections between 2000 and present, it is highly likely that neither Trump nor GWB would have occupied the office of POTUS and there would likely be less and terrorism war in the world and the USA would be better off economically, socially, and of international repute.

People like me (and Sanders and Sarandon and probably SLAD) aren't going to influence the GOP and the right wing but can influence and support the Democratic party, but to do that requires support by the Democratic party of the voters.

[seemslikeadream]

I am extremely glad Clinton is not president and I am also extremely pissed off that trump is president. I can hold those to thoughts in my head at the same time

unlike some people here they hate Clinton so much that they do not care what trump does ...even endorsing a pedophile or being one for that matter

they are so pissed that Clinton lost the election and they can not now constantly post shit about what she is doing as president so all they can do is make stuff up about what she WOULD do IF she was president...get over it


In my opinion there is no reason not to hold criminals accountable for their crimes against the U.S. and if that involves Putin so be it ...it does no good to ignore treason

we are not talking petty theft here or a blow job

I never read DU....I only google my posts there from 10 years ago for reference

[Elvis]

The big problem really is the depth and breadth of stupidity.

Should Hillary Clinton be Impeached?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMupq6zB1Tc

[seemslikeadream]

I rest my case ...thank you very much

[0_0]

[seemslikeadream]

Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:01 pm and Hillary Clinton STILL NOT president...I know it is a sad but reality bites



Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:01 pm trump is president and a danger to the entire planet

[MacCruiskeen]

[Rory]

IMG_20171124_224141.jpg