Iamwhomiam » Sun May 06, 2018 2:52 pm wrote:Rory » Fri May 04, 2018 3:38 pm
By the way - I also don't know how you can see the posts of someone you put on ignore. very ostentatiously, and self righteously. But there's another mystery for another thread.
Perhaps you could discuss this matter with Belligerent Savage; he seems to know how it's done: http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?p=656956#p656956
Any other title would be a display of bias.
Iamwhomiam » Sun May 06, 2018 9:03 pm wrote:If you're asking me, Belligerent Savant, I have no idea. I've never felt the need to apply an external filter to censor my reading. As I wrote to Rory, you seem to know how it's done. Discuss it with him.
I seem to have been just fine, ignoring almost all of AD's contributions because most are of no interest to me at all. As you know, my son was killed by someone with extremist views.
I'm far more concerned with dangers facing my immediate family, like micro-plastics in our municipal water supplies, than I am of any radical's personal agenda. It would be a mistake to call AD a radical, either, without knowing him personally.
Elvis » Sun May 06, 2018 10:12 pm wrote:Any other title would be a display of bias.
but but but... the existing title itself displays bias, that of a premature conclusion.
"The Skripal Affair" is pretty neutral.
Burnt Hill » Sun May 06, 2018 9:00 pm wrote:It is literally the title of the article presented in the original post.
Belligerent Savant wrote:No need for additional online "nannies".
Users browsing this forum: AlienSpaceBat and 15 guests