https://www.scribd.com/document/2723956 ... rview-1991
.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Wombaticus Rex » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:03 pm wrote:Agent Orange Cooper » Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:55 pm wrote:Listened to much McKenna before?
I've been respectful to you, bud, c'mon now.
Agent Orange Cooper » Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:14 pm wrote:It was an honest question.
Agent Orange Cooper » Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:55 pm wrote:Only someone unfamiliar with his rap, and bringing an overly literal/absolutist mindset, plus a paranoia level only possible in the post-9/11 world would believe nonsense like what Irvin suggests - that he's secretly/openly outing himself as a CIA agent. Now *that's* funny.
It looks like pathology to me, and a lot of people see that. But then Jan will say, well, you won't go through these 20 databases that I've sent you and these 200 links. And you've got to understand, no Jan I won't
Agent Orange Cooper » Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:55 pm wrote:Context doesn't just mean the preceding 4 minutes of conversation - it's an entire career of writing and speaking being referenced. Because he had at this point spent like 15 years talking publicly about the DMT elves and Mushroom entity as being his guiding agency.
BNDD agents Don Strange (right)
and Howard Safir (left) arrest Leary
(1972)
American Dream » Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:06 pm wrote:Grimstad's Nazi sympathies only serve to heighten my doubts about Robert Anton Wilson. Promoting characters like him, Michael Hoffman, Pauwels and Bergier (Nouvelle Droite types), as well as (I think) John Michell, Gary Allen, Nesta Helen Webster, Thor Heyerdahl etc., not to mention the left-handed monkey wrenches of the OTO Caliphate denotes very bad judgement, at best.
Maybe the concerns that he may have been Tim Leary's handler in that crucial time after the Doctor was released from jail, not to mention the speculation that he played a similar role for Kerry Thornley, need to be kept alive. This shit stands in stark contrast to what was going on in Berkeley CA at the time that Cosmic Trigger. Where was the left wing discourse? There was maybe a little, but not much at all.
Once, when explaining why he didn't vote for Libertarian Party candidate Ed Clark, Wilson wrote "I am not that kind of Libertarian, really; I don't hate poor people."
"There's some confusion about what his political philosophy was like. Wilson is always claimed by the Libertarians because he was against people being arrested for victimless crimes, but the Libertarians won't tell you that RAW also was a strong proponent of the "basic income guarantee" which would make him more of a Socialist than Libertarian, of course, but really he was neither. He wasn't deluded by any political system is perhaps the best way to put it)."
I have also been corresponding for a year now with a 33º freemason in Texas. Part of the time I think he’s the real Real Head of the Illuminati. Part of the time I think that he thinks I’m the Real Head. And part of the time I think he just likes to correspond with professional writers about occult subjects…
I agree passionately with Maurice Nicoll (a physician who mastered both Jungian and Gurdjieffian systems) who wrote that the major purpose of “work on consciousness” is to “decrease the amount of violence in the world.” The main difference between our world and Swift’s is that while we have stopped killing each other over religious differences (outside the Near East and Northern Ireland), we have developed an insane passion for killing each other over ideological differences. I regard Organized Ideology with the same horror that Voltaire had for Organized Religion.
Concretely, I am indeed a Male Feminist, as L.A. Rollins claimed (although seeing myself often on TV, I deny that I simper; I don’t even swish); like all libertarians, I oppose victimless crime laws, all drug control laws, and all forms of censorship (whether by outright reactionaries or Revolutionary Committees or Radical Feminists).
I passionately hate violence, but am not a Dogmatic Pacifist, since I don’t have Joan Baez’s Correct Answer Machine in my head. I know I would kill an armed aggressor, in a concrete crisis situation where that was the only defense of the specific lives of specific individuals I love, although I would never kill a person or employ even minor violence, or physical coercion, on behalf of capitalized Abstractions or Governments (who are all damned liars.) All these are matters of Existential Choice on my part, and not dogmas revealed to me by some god or some philosopher-priest of Natural Law.
I prefer the various Utopian systems I have mentioned to the Conservative position that humanity is incorrigible and I also think that if none of these Utopian scenarios are workable, some system will eventually arrive better than any we have ever known. I share the Jeffersonian (“Liberal”?) vision that the human mind can exceed all previous limits in a society where freedom of thought is the norm rather than a rare exception.
Does all of this make me a Leftist or a Rightist? I leave that for the Euclideans to decide.
I prefer the various Utopian systems I have mentioned to the Conservative position that humanity is incorrigible and I also think that if none of these Utopian scenarios are workable, some system will eventually arrive better than any we have ever known. I share the Jeffersonian (“Liberal”?) vision that the human mind can exceed all previous limits in a society where freedom of thought is the norm rather than a rare exception.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests