Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
stickdog99 » Wed Apr 24, 2019 1:09 pm wrote:Sure, corporate media and US Empire pressure appear to have almost every single member of the US Congress afraid to take a principled stance on the clearly illegal and unconscionable US coup attempt in Venezuela, and this is mind-numbingly disappointing. Is anybody in or near US federal power on the legal, moral, self-determination side of this issue?
Still, all things are relative. And Sanders and AOC are both enlightened Buddhas relative to our average representatives at all levels of government in the United States, including student and union government. And they aren't just the lesser of two diabolical oligarchic water carriers, which is the only dynamic I have seen for over a half a century.
Three short years ago, the establishment tried to write off Sanders' platform as the voice of some sort of lunatic fringe that never needed to be taken seriously and would never be seriously considered. Now, even DNC's proffered Obama clones have to pay lip service to Sanders' platform. So why is now the time to throw up our hands and bemoan any chance at any electoral progress? This makes no sense to me. What do we have to lose by continuing to fight to get these issues on the table?
A quick search reveals that this unfortunate choice of shirts is being talked about mainly in fringe-right circles. The level of fascism of Chakrabarti remains to be determined...
Karmamatterz » 24 Apr 2019 18:01 wrote:A quick search reveals that this unfortunate choice of shirts is being talked about mainly in fringe-right circles. The level of fascism of Chakrabarti remains to be determined...
Unfortunate choice of shirts? Bwaaahaahahaha.
I see, it's the messenger, not the facts? So if the "fringe right" brings it up then it should be dismissed? What about those who aren't on the fringe right? Just your average person not on either extreme who wonders who the heck is that guy on his "unfortunate" shirts? Is that more acceptable?
Degrees of fascism? Oh boy, really got some zingers going here now. Did you mean to put that in green?
One can easily imagine the visceral outrage if certain other people wore shirts displaying known fascists. We're not talking about something minor. When you actually wear clothing depicting images it means a lot. It's not like he was wearing a Nike shirt that was super comfortable when hot and sweaty so the Nike logo not being a big deal. We're talking about a known fascist who shook hands with Adolf Hitler and then was assisted by the Nazis in his efforts to travel to Japan.
Bose having a nice, warm and friendly chat with Himmler. How quaint.
JackRiddler » 24 Apr 2019 18:51 wrote:.
Bose wasn't fascist, he was Congress party. Still, who the hell makes t-shirts of him?!
In context of the India independence struggle, he made the, I would agree, fatal and unforgivable error of allying actively with the Nazis and Japanese against the British Empire that had colonized India. Congress and Gandhi didn't see reason to support the British against Germany, no matter what the context. The Indian case is the only one in which I can understand that. Congress chose 1943 for an uprising, also understandable especially following the mass death during the classically British famines of 1942 (food was being exported; Churchill's correspondence on it was to the effect of too bad for the starving Indians, the troops and our allies need the food). Congress did not ally with Nazi Germany, however, let alone like Bose take up arms against British rule in India with a Japanese-led army of exile Indians operating out of Burma. So he is discredited, within India also, and usually left out of the Congress/independence struggle pantheon.
One question is what Chakrabarti thinks he is wearing.
.
Bose wasn't fascist, he was Congress party.
Sure the party didn't "visit" Nazi Germany and sit down for tea, Bose DID. Maybe Himmler and Bose weren't trading recipes for Zyklon B, perhaps they were just sharing ideas on segregation and using fascist forms of government to gently rule nations.Congress did not ally with Nazi Germany
Bose also founded the Free India Center and created the Indian Legion (4500 soldiers altogether) which was attached to the German Army, but later placed under the authority of the Waffen-SS. The members of the Indian Legion were required to swear allegiance to Hitler and Bose in order to secure German support.
"One is inclined to hold that the next phase in world-history will produce a synthesis between Communism and Fascism. And will it be a surprise if that synthesis in produced in India? ... In spite of the antithesis between Communism and Fascism, there are certain traits in common. Both Communism and Fascism believe in the supremacy of the State over the individual. Both denounce parliamentary democracy. Both believe in party rule. Both believe in the dictatorship of the party and in the ruthless suppression of all dissenting minorities. Both believe in a planned industrial reorganization of the country. These common traits will form the basis of the new synthesis. That synthesis is called ... 'Samyavada' -- an Indian word, which means literally 'the doctrine of synthesis or equality.' It will be India's task to work out this synthesis." -- Subhas Chandra Bose, The Indian Struggle (Bombay, New York: Asia Publishing House,1964), pp. 313f.
One question is what Chakrabarti thinks he is wearing.
But we can't possibly take AOC seriously because she hired someone who commemorates an assassinated leader in the struggle for Indian independence on his t-shirt because you can produce PICTURES OF THIS SAME GUY MEETING WITH NAZIS!. That's the entire depth of your argument?
The Indian National Congress, led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Maulana Azad, denounced Nazi Germany but would not fight it or anyone else until India was independent.[9] Congress launched the Quit India Movement in August 1942, refusing to co-operate in any way with the government until independence was granted. The government wasn't ready for this move. It immediately arrested over 60,000 national and local Congress leaders, and then moved to suppress the violent reaction of Congress supporters. Key leaders were kept in prison until June 1945, although Gandhi was released in May 1944 because of his health. Congress, with its leaders incommunicado, played little role on the home front. The Muslim League rejected the Quit India movement and worked closely with the Raj authorities.[10]
Supporters of the British Raj argued that decolonisation was impossible in the middle of a great war. So, in 1939, the British Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow declared India's entry into the War without consulting prominent Indian Congress leaders who were just elected in previous elections.[1]
Subhas Chandra Bose (also called Netaji) had been a top Congress leader. He broke with Congress and tried to form a military alliance with Germany or Japan to gain independence. Bose, with the assistance of Germany, formed the Indian Legion from Indian students in Axis occupied Europe and Indian Army prisoners of war. With German reversals in 1942 and 1943, Bose and the Legion's officers were transported by U boat to Japanese territory to continue his plans. Upon arrival, Japan helped him set up the Indian National Army (INA) which fought under Japanese direction, mostly in Burma Campaign. Bose also headed the Provisional Government of Free India, a government-in-exile based in Singapore. It controlled no Indian territory and was used only to raise troops for Japan.[11]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests