Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
"I WISH the white gun nut militias protesting in Michigan WOULD HAVE ALSO protested the Flint Water crisis...also in Michigan. The fact they dont give a shit about poor people/minority(sorry...I mean "POC") folks and the left cant wait to give up their freedom for this bioweapon and narc on people walking their dog...its just so sad. All sides are being polarized and played against eachother
Just as I said when I joined RI in 2007, the agenda was always the end game of WW3 with China, Iran etc....great depression 2.0, and mass civil unrest/civil war in America. Didnt think itd be a virus pandemic, but here we are."
undead » Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:55 am wrote:Personally, I have encountered attitudes from family members suggesting that anyone who questions the government narrative on this will be painted as a right wing sociopath who is unconcerned with the health of others. Like the equation of 9/11 critics with Alex Jones type right wingers. That seems to be what the media is pushing. I would encourage protesting except that when it's waving American flags, I am not with it at all. On Easter I went for a walk outside with 2 friends - a protest by all indications of how everyone is reacting. The bar has been set very low for civil disobedience. Before, blocking traffic. Now, standing 5.75 feet from each other, not wearing masks, etc.
JackRiddler » Thu Apr 16, 2020 10:56 am wrote:.
Okay, I'll try one: in a system arranged for the many, not the few, that girl would have been sent home with full pay and free health care if needed and the guarantee she could return to her job when the trouble was over. She would not have been declared an "essential worker." The state would issue funds as needed to cover payroll in the interim.
Everyone in the vulnerable groups would have been asked to take the same option, or otherwise provided with care, income and shelter to quarantine under humane conditions.
As for the rest of us, everyone under 65 or 70, feeling well, and not suffering from one of the preexisting conditions? That's a big question. If our death rate from this virus is far under 0.1%, as appears to be the case -- still up to one in a thousand -- it seems we should have taken every care to avoid contact with the vulnerable while spreading it amongst ourselves until we all passed the contagious phase and had immunity, all the while increasing the hospital resources so that we had a comfortable reserve to handle the outbreak. (Yes, empty hospital beds are a GOOD thing. A smart and humane society will maintain a high surplus of them.)
Maybe someone can argue why that's the wrong approach, and why some form of general "lockdown" was needed, but no one's going to convince me of the uses of the more extreme panic applied (not mostly by the official medical authorities but the extra panic).
These two examples may be pet peeves, but I've been particularly angered by the bullshit (in published material, that is) about how we need 25-foot distancing OUTDOORS because droplets act like second-hand smoke, or how you should treat your house like an active operating room because the virus is as hard to dispose of as spilled glitter, or the plastic industry propaganda about how you should be banned from bringing your own bag to the supermarket. By diverting energy to bullshit fears, these kinds of unhinged claims also kill, I believe.
.
Elvis » Thu Apr 16, 2020 11:59 am wrote:Maybe it's overblown (data still seems insufficient), but can it really be just nothing?
JackRiddler » Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:32 pm wrote:There's no doubt of 10-12,000 excess deaths in New York City so far. The lethality number (death rate for infected) could still come in at .33% ish or less, that is if the infection rate of the overall population was high enough to mean 3 million already had it. Which, by the way, I totally believe. As a matter of logic, not empirical data. Since the latter has not been generated. Here goes my mantra of the recent days again: antigen tests of large random samplings of the whole population in cross section.
JackRiddler » Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:32 pm wrote:There's no doubt of 10-12,000 excess deaths in New York City so far.
liminalOyster » Thu Apr 16, 2020 5:42 pm wrote:JackRiddler » Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:32 pm wrote:There's no doubt of 10-12,000 excess deaths in New York City so far. The lethality number (death rate for infected) could still come in at .33% ish or less, that is if the infection rate of the overall population was high enough to mean 3 million already had it. Which, by the way, I totally believe. As a matter of logic, not empirical data. Since the latter has not been generated. Here goes my mantra of the recent days again: antigen tests of large random samplings of the whole population in cross section.
Once the - people I know are dying or at risk - phase ends, I'm quite prepared to discuss the horror of the idea of sero-monitoring. Too soon now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests