Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
liminalOyster » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:07 am wrote:The masks are debilitating. No doubt. Step outside and exercise... Now, run another lap without the mask. I think you'll accept that it's easier to function without your face smothered;
I jogged 2 miles in a mask this past week. It was slightly weird. It had no impact on my breathing.
Nordic » Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:49 am wrote:liminalOyster » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:07 am wrote:The masks are debilitating. No doubt. Step outside and exercise... Now, run another lap without the mask. I think you'll accept that it's easier to function without your face smothered;
I jogged 2 miles in a mask this past week. It was slightly weird. It had no impact on my breathing.
Why the FUCK did you do that?![]()
![]()
liminalOyster » Sat Aug 01, 2020 6:54 pm wrote:Thanks, DrEvil for making me laugh instead of writing something reactive. I like to jog. I deeply understand why some people hate it, also.
I just drove by the governors house in my town and saw a bunch of unmasked yahoos protesting our current mask mandate, We have the highest rate of COVID per capita in our state. And we have a wildly disproportionate number of Black people dying due to comorbid chronic illness. And we have utterly anemic prevention measures and moving in on a 3% infection rate in the whole state. I wear a mask because I don't know enough (and don't believe the scientific community does either) to feel comfortable with exposure, which is almost certain when jogging for two miles in a city of unmasked people.
Many people who have worked in certain areas of art, medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, technology, contracting or science have worn masks for hours at a time. Many of those masks are waaaaaaaaaay more uncomfortable than N95, KN95 or cloth masks and worn for much longer. I sincerely sympathize with those for whom they are anxiety provoking and thus lead to a feeling of not being able to breath, but it's just a feeling, assuming you're wearing a functioning mask. I have asthma by the way.
No comment necessary
By Charlie Stross
Post-infection cardiac damage found in 78% of recovering COVID19 patients
That's 78% of a cohort, average age 49, of whom 67% had recovered at home (ie. disease was not categorized as severe enough to need hospitalization). Cohort was normalized with respect to other risk factors relative to uninfected patients. Diagnosis by MRI. Looks reasonably solid, at first glance, publication in JAMA Cardiol. (Journal of the American Medical Association, cardiology). Study coordinated via a German hospital.
Reason for "no comment necessary" is that this suggests most COVID19 survivors—including mild disease survivors—suffer cardiac damage.
You don't want to get this virus.
Belligerent Savant » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:51 pm wrote:.
The body has great capacity to heal. Long-term damage cannot be ascertained at this time. Let's see what the findings are 12-18 months after initial symptoms. And then, 2 years+ (if such things can be reliably determined in non-controlled settings).
Pneumonia can also have lasting damage, as can a severe flu. If you're younger, there's greater probability of full recovery with a proper regimen/diet. If you're older, as with any other illness, the potential for chronic traits is more likely, particularly if already enduring other ailments (comorbidities).
Such is life. As it has been from the onset.
It may well be more risky out there in the coming years, unfortunately. But i for one will not be driven by fear.
CDC director acknowledges hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests