Have you seen that document ahe quotes?
Its 50 pages long, some of it is jargon heavy and its complicated information. So I'd probably want to read it twice to understand it properly. At least twice and then its gonna take hours to get my head around stuff I don't understand.
Why can't she just cite the relevent bit so we can works backwards?
Anyway in the first 10 pages the only relevent bit I can find is this:
The oligonucleotide primers and probes for detection of 2019-nCoV were selected from regions of the
virus nucleocapsid (N) gene. The panel is designed for specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 (two
primer/probe sets). An additional primer/probe set to detect the human RNase P gene (RP) in control
samples and clinical specimens is also included in the panel.
That directly contradicts what she said. Its on page 4.
Next paragraph is this:
In the process, the probe anneals to a specific target sequence located between
the forward and reverse primers. As it is to fully understand the details of what I've quoted is gonna take hours of reading as well. But no one needs to do that to see the paper is referring to SARS 2/covid genetic material.
That is on page four. If there is info in there that undermines that description where is it?