UK will now HIDE Vaccinated Cases and Deaths
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
by stickdog99 » Sat Mar 19, 2022 1:15 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 20, 2022 1:32 pm
by drstrangelove » Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:14 pm
CDC reports fewer COVID-19 pediatric deaths after data correction
The reduction cut the CDC's estimate of deaths in children by 24% to 1,341 as of March 18.
by Harvey » Mon Mar 21, 2022 10:30 am
by Belligerent Savant » Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:27 pm
Plaintiffs, :
:
v. :
:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE :
CONTROL & PREVENTION :
1600 Clifton Rd. :
Atlanta, GA 30329 :
:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & :
HUMAN SERVICES :
200 Independence Ave., SW :
Washington, DC 20201 :
:
Defendants
COMPLAINT
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Ten commercial airline pilots bring this suit to vacate and permanently enjoin enforcement
of the Federal Transportation Mask Mandate (“FTMM”)1 put into place by orders of the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (“CDC”) – under the purported authority of its parent agency, the Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) (collectively “the defendants”).
By mandating masks for all American travelers and employees in the transportation sector, the defendants have acted without statutory authorization or following the rulemaking process required by the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). This mandate also raises serious constitutional concerns. Because of the FTMM, numerous state, local, and regional transportation and airport authorities are told to enforce a federal mandate that is in direct conflict with the laws and policies of all 50 states that prohibit mask mandates or do not require face coverings.
The Court should vacate worldwide2 the FTMM because it is an illegal and unconstitutional exercise of executive authority. The mask mandate is procedurally defective because the defendants adopted it without following the APA’s notice-and-comment requirements or considering the impact on tens of millions of travelers and transportation workers every single day. They also ignored countless scientific and medical studies and articles showing that face masks are totally ineffective in reducing coronavirus spread but are harmful to human health in at least 68 ways.
Congress never intended for the Executive Branch to have the authority to promulgate this policy – and even if it did, it’s unconstitutional. CDC and HHS may not exercise their authority in a manner that is inconsistent with the administrative structure that Congress enacted.
...
March 19, 2022
The book The Year the World Went Mad by SAGE-member Mark Woolhouse, has now been published as an audiobook and will be available in hard cover on April 12th. This is an important book, for here the author, a key player in the pandemic response in the UK, admits that more or less everything he and his colleagues suggested and the government did was wrong.
In this interview with Spiked-online, Woolhouse admits that focused protection, as suggested by the proponents of the Great Barrington Declaration, would have been the right approach, and that he and his associates knew it. He even claims they suggested it, but nobody listened. However, even if they did, why didn’t they speak up? The scientists who wrote and published the Great Barrington Declaration were denounced as pseudo-scientists – and by whom? Among others, by the very people who knew they were right all along.
In the author‘s own words:“So how do you protect those people? First of all, since they have to have contact with certain people, you make it as Covid-safe as possible for them to have those interactions. Take all the precautions we know to take now, about wearing masks, ventilation and physical distancing. But that alone is not enough. You need to make sure that the contact themselves does not have an infection and is not going to pass it on to the vulnerable people they’re interacting with. We were talking about this in April and May 2020 to many people in government. But we never implemented it. It never took off. And yet it’s quite clear from our work that this would have had a very significant impact. It would not be enough by itself “You still need to suppress the virus to a degree, but you would not need lockdown.”
The lockdowns, travel bans, school closures and all the rest were useless and extremely harmful to society. But still the scientists in charge of the pandemic response, including Mark Woolhouse, promoted those methods and justified them. They derided those who criticised their methods, cancelled them, claimed they didn’t respect science. But it was the other way around. This, we must never forget.
This book is a good step. But I wonder if the author has apologised to those who were right all along, to Martin Kulldorff, Sunetra Gupta, Jay Bhattacharya and all the other honest, real scientists who had the courage and moral integrity to tell the truth. If he hasn’t, I urge him to do so.
by stickdog99 » Mon Mar 21, 2022 3:25 pm
by stickdog99 » Mon Mar 21, 2022 3:26 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Mon Mar 21, 2022 4:21 pm
The Takeover of America's Legal System
The kids didn't grow out of it.
...
Since 2011, law firms have been pressured to drop or turn down a long list of clients: fossil fuel companies, foreign universities, a GOP-controlled House of Representatives, employers challenging Biden’s vaccine mandate, and, of course, Donald Trump.
These pressures—both internal and external—have had a chilling effect. If defending anti-vaxxers can cost you business, law firms reason, imagine the blowback of defending a transphobe or a racist.
“It doesn’t even occur to people to take controversial cases,” one lawyer in Washington, D.C., said. Religious liberty cases, for example, are “totally off the table. I wouldn’t even think to bring it up.”
Another lawyer, who specializes in First Amendment litigation, described being forced to turn away a client with far-right views because the firm thought that any association with the client—even if the claims advanced were meritorious—would be bad for business.
The problem, Strossen said, is that rights mean nothing without representation. “ANYONE who doesn’t have access to counsel in defending a right, as a practical matter, doesn’t have a meaningful opportunity to exercise that right,” the former ACLU chief told me in an email. “Hence, undermining representation for any unpopular speaker or idea endangers freedom for ANY speaker or idea, because the tides of popularity are constantly shifting.”
by Belligerent Savant » Mon Mar 21, 2022 10:43 pm
drstrangelove » Sun Mar 20, 2022 7:14 pm wrote:This has been posted but I feel the need for emphasis:CDC reports fewer COVID-19 pediatric deaths after data correction
The reduction cut the CDC's estimate of deaths in children by 24% to 1,341 as of March 18.
- https://www.reuters.com/business/health ... 022-03-18/
This is actually the type of evidence I've been waiting for. This is the power of the information authorities. All they need to do is control the point at which reality is converted into data, an arbitrary process, before allowing it to flow down through all the institutional machinery.
A professional who works with data cannot function on the possibility their data is corrupted. They cannot accept it. They'll acknowledge that there are issues, but then pretend they don't matter by either ignoring inconvenient data by literally just calling it 'noise', or by applying subjective controls using the very thing they claim to objectively remedy, INTUITION. They must accept what they are given is close enough to reality to give their job value. This is why they hate intuition. Why they appeal to authority.
This is the cult of Pythagoras, their oath was "all things are assimilated to number". They were allied to the Greek oligarch states. Because, if you can demonstrate reality is objective, that there is always a correct version of a thing(Plato's perfect world of forms), you can 'prove' that there is a correct ruling class, and freeze society's hierarchy in place. This is why they hate pi. It is an irrational number, proving that even their numbers are irrational and arbitrary. There is no inherent order in nature other than the one which emerges, subjectively, through the human experience that projects from the body. Anything subjective must be dealt with collectively. Majority rule, minority rights.
ever wonder why tech entrepreneurs all have aspergers? Pythagoras.
The CDC is fudging the all-cause mortality data
Maria Romana
Statistical research analyst. Wife. Mother. Dog Lover. Freedom fighter and free thinker. Not necessarily in that order. Former prolific Twitterer of 10 years, 8K followers, and 35K Tweets. Now de-personed.
Feb 14
Really, they don’t want me dead?
Just kidding, of course they do. But they don’t want your loved ones to blame your death on the vaccine, their horrible hospital protocols, or their withholding of effective early treatments. Accordingly, it appears the CDC has been fudging their 2021 mortality data. I’ll pretend I’m shocked.
Honestly, I am, a bit. My shock threshold has risen way up over the last two years, but this one took me by surprise. I just had a conversation the other day with my science-nerd daughter about how the one statistic they really can’t fool around with is the total deaths number, because it’s compiled from county-level offices and has to match up at least somewhat with other sources. But alas, nothing is sacred, and no one is accountable in our federal government any longer.
For those who don’t remember, three months ago, I wrote a post entitled, They Want You Dead: All-Cause Mortality Up 51% in 25-54 yr olds for Q3 2021, where I compared the excess mortality in the third quarters of 2020 and 2021. Excess mortality was defined as the difference between those years’ deaths and the average of 2015-2019. You can return to that post here, if you’d like to refresh yourself:They Want You Dead: All-Cause Mortality Up 51% in 25-54 yr olds for Q3 2021
Maria Romana
Nov 24, 2021
My plan was to return to this topic, now, three months later, and do the same for Q4. I was pretty excited to run this next chapter, because I wanted to see how many more people our esteemed leaders had killed with their poor treatment protocols, booster shots, and teenager shots over the holiday season. But a funny thing happened when I downloaded the refreshed dataset…
Typically, the numbers in the CDC all-cause mortality data will change over time, because corrections happen, and late reports flow in, even months later. That’s why I waited, both with my original piece and with this one, until 5 or 6 weeks into the new quarter before downloading the data. Just to be sure of my numbers, though, I always keep the originals as they were, start a whole new spreadsheet for the update, and check for differences. As I said, you expect some change—usually way less than 1%—but it’s almost always an upward correction. It’s not often you find folks who were marked as deceased, magically come back to life. The corrections usually go the other way; the death counts go up.
But not this time.
You see, between my original download in mid-November 2021 and my new one in mid-February of supposedly the same data, the count of Americans who died from all causes during the first three quarters of 2021 fell by over 220K. That’s right, we’ve got some serious zombie action going on at the CDC—almost a quarter million newly “undead” Americans.
So let’s break this down. In my summary table below, going across, you’ll find the original data from November, then the February update, then the difference. As you can see, the older data, the 2015-2019 average (1st set of rows), is virtually unchanged, which you would expect after two years. The 2020 data (middle rows) has some adjustments, which isn’t crazy, because it’s still somewhat fresh, and lots of local government offices were closed for a good portion of 2020 and 2021, but as you’ll notice, the 2020 adjustments are almost all increases, that is, new deaths that weren’t reported earlier, a few hundred on top of 3.4 million (+0.02%).
What I’ve never seen before is what’s going on with the 2021 data (bottom set of rows)--basically, a 9% downward correction in deaths. To put this in highly sophisticated mathematics language, “Say what?” There’s no logical explanation for that kind of correction in CDC mortality stats, and none of their technical notes begin to address this.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-XS-Deaths- ... /m74n-4hbs
What’s even more interesting is that the majority of the “correction” is stuffed into the second and third quarters, and very little in the first. It’s almost like the fudgery is purposely paired with the time period when the majority of the young and healthy people in this country were being vaccinated and boosted, and lots of people, vaxxed or not, were experiencing the Delta variant without the benefit of early treatment. You know, almost like someone wants to make it look like a bunch of people didn’t die, when they did.
I further explored whether these variances were clustered by gender, age, or racial group, as that might’ve pointed to some honest error in data collection. But no, the changes were rather neatly distributed across those categories, almost like something that could’ve been done algorithmically…not that I’m implying any data hanky-panky here.
So help me out, folks. Has anyone heard of any big all-cause mortality correction move by the CDC lately? Am I missing something everybody else knows? Is it really Night of the Living Dead this time? Or are they actually fooling around with the one statistic I always thought couldn’t be monkeyed with?
I do plan to go ahead and create an update to the earlier article with the Q4 numbers, but I won’t feel good about it. This data looks like garbage!
...
In my November post, I focused on only the third quarter of the year, because I wanted to see what effect the vaccination roll-out had on mortality, so I had to leave enough time for everyone who wanted to, to get vaxxed. By the time of the big mandate announcement by Joe Biden near the end of third quarter, about 52% of the US population had had two doses of the vaccines. As of today, that number is 65%, with many of that additional 13% forced into it by employers/mandates, which have mostly been struck down since. Without that element of force, and with more vax facts slipping out into the public sphere, the number who have volunteered for a booster shot of the chemical brew sits at only 29%.
Most of those additional shots were given during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, but the vast majority of original vaccination happened prior to Q3, so let’s see how this jabbarama has played out for Americans, especially younger, low-COVID-risk Americans (which is everyone under about 75).
So what we have here is a comparison of excess death rates between 2020 and 2021 (for a refresher of how this is calculated, please refer to the original post). Now, clearly, the vaccines did not return US mortality to normal, which would be 0% excess death, and in fact, the Q3/Q4 combo—the entire second half of 2021—appears to have been more deadly for many of us than was our first Q3/Q4 with this novel virus, at least for those in that 25-69 year old key demographic that our economy depends on.
For those of you who are graph and chart-challenged, allow me to state it plainly: 25-39 year olds died at a 53% higher rate than normal in 2021, compared to 39% above normal in 2020. And for 40-54 year olds, those numbers are 45% and 28%. In other words, roughly half again as many excess deaths occurred in 2021 as in the prior year.
Do you really want to tell me that’s due to delayed cancer diagnoses? In 25-54 year olds? Really?
...
The next popular theory is that all the excess deaths were from unvaccinated people dying of the COVID Delta variant. I suspect you, my readers, are bright enough to not need a graph on this one, but here you go anyway.
What we see above is that during Q3/Q4 2021, when 70-80% of the population over twelve years old had had one or two COVID shots, and another 30% had had three, deaths ostensibly due to COVID doubled or even tripled in the age groups that were at lowest risk to begin with. Even in the 70-84 year old group, deaths barely declined. Only the 85+ group saw a significant benefit. That’s some effective vaccine, eh? It’s almost like we should’ve just protected the high risk people and let everyone else get on with their life, untouched by the miracle of modern med—, er, chemistry. In fact, it’s almost like everything all those vaccine experts have been saying all along about vaccinating during a pandemic wasn’t misinformation at all…
...
a word to those who are getting sucked into the war propaganda—never, never forget how much you were lied to over the last two years, and then ask yourself why you should trust anything that’s coming out of your government or its bought-and-paid-for media lapdogs ever again.
...
by Belligerent Savant » Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:58 am
@AWokeZombie
·
For the "Hospitals Overwhelmed" crowd. Still not near 2019 pre covid census. And we've never even gotten back to pre-covid census, even during our worst surges. Maybe thats why we saw all those Tik Tok videos.@kerpen
·
February 2022 another brutal month for hospital underutilization, with inpatients volumes even lower than February 2021.
We have not had a single month reach 2019 levels in inpatient admissions or ER visits since the pandemic started.
https://info.stratadecision.com/hubfs/W ... _Final.pdf
by Grizzly » Tue Mar 22, 2022 10:41 pm
Share This Video
Clip
Bookmark To MyC-SPAN
Clipping Guide
Text type
Filter by Speaker
Search this text
00:02:00
THIS THAT IT WILL BE DISRUPTED? AND SOCIAL UNREST? >> FROM THE GATES FOUNDATIONS STANDPOINT FIRST NEGATIVE YOU JUST HEARD FROM TOM WE MUST BE READY...
Show Full Text
00:02:17
SCENARIO. BUT WHAT WE LEARNED FROM EBOLA IS THEY'RE UNDERUTILIZED AND NOT READY AND ONE IS THE GOVERNMENT MAKES THE CALL WHEN THE THINGS HAPPEN AND...
Show Full Text
00:03:57
SCANDAL WITH HOMELAND'S SECURITY I DON'T KNOW HOW WORRIED THAT GENERAL PUBLIC IS BUT IF THEY AFFECT AFRICA OR PREGNANT WOMEN SO HOW MANY OF THESE ARE...
Show Full Text
00:04:31
STRENGTHENED. AND THEN STOP THEM WHEREVER POSSIBLE WITH THAT GLOBAL HEALTH PROTECTION THEY ARE INSTITUTIONS THAT NEED TO BE STRENGTHENED AND WILL HOLD ...
Show Full Text
00:06:12
DONE? ONCE YOU HAVE A STRUCTURE IN PLACE? WITH EBOLA IS THERE ENOUGH THAT IS APPLICABLE TO THE INFLUENCE THE PANDEMIC? >> BUT THE FIRST THING TO PARTNER...
Show Full Text
00:06:37
DO HELP US TO UNDERSTAND WITH OF GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE SO TO FIGURE OUT THAT PEACE IN IS ESSENTIAL BUT ON THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE SIDE FROM THE GATES FOUNDATION...
Show Full Text
00:08:11
AND THE FIRST TO GIVE US RESOURCES WITH THE USUAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS AND THEN TO PROVIDE TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND COMPANIES WITH UH NEXT THREAT. >>...
Show Full Text
00:08:50
CHALLENGE IS TO GET GOOD DAY DAD COULD GLOBAL DATA THAT IS BELIEVABLE LAND ON TIME. AND WITH THAT TECHNOLOGY TO COLLABORATE WEATHER'S CDC FOR THE FOUNDATION...
Show Full Text
00:09:31
DRY WITH THE RISK OF POISON OR DEEP? SO THEY HAVE GENETICALLY MODIFYING THE MISKITOS? DIRECT THERE ARE TWO APPROACHES OF WHAT WE CALL VECTOR CONTROL...
Show Full Text
00:12:34
CHANCES. >> MISKITOS ARE QUITE DIFFICULT TO CONTROL THEY CAN HAVE TONIGHT BOTTLE CAP AND NORTH FULL OF WATER THEY COELHO OF THIS SPREAD SERIOUS
00:12:47
DISEASES AND THEY ARE THE URBAN PEST LIKE A COCKROACH THERE THE COCKROACH OF MOSQUITOS WE HAVE TO DO TWO THINGS. WE HAVE TO MIX AND MATCH CURRENT...
Show Full Text
00:14:28
PLANNING. ONE THAT WE MADE TO GET THE RIGHT COMMUNICATION NOW THEY'RE SO THOSE WHO COULD BECOME PREGNANT NEW-LINE WAS GOING ON AND HOW TO PREVENT ...
Show Full Text
00:15:08
BUGS WHEN REALLY IT WAS A VIRUS AND OTHER BACTERIAL INFECTION SO ARE YOU SEEING PROGRESS TO STOP OVERUSING ANTIBIOTICS TO PREVENT THOSE WHO ARE TAKING...
Show Full Text
00:15:48
ANTIBIOTIC. IF WE'RE NOT CAREFUL WE WILL BE POST ANTIBIOTIC AREA. AND THE ECONOMIC IMPACT IS ENORMOUS. IT ISN'T LIKE AMMONIA OR YOU TEEFIVE THE MODERN...
Show Full Text
00:18:33
ANTIBIOTICS AND WANTED IT TO WHERE THEY ARE NEEDED IF YOU DO HAVE A BACTERIAL INFECTION THAT INCLUDES ANTI-MICROBIAL SENSITIVE THINGS THAT OUR GLOBAL...
Show Full Text
00:20:09
DISINFECTANT SO TO MY KNOWLEDGE THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A VACCINATION CAMPAIGN WITH NO PARANOIAC CONSPIRACY THEORY. WITH THE GATES FOUNDATION IS FULL...
Show Full Text
00:20:41
WERE DISABLED BY POLIO. THIS YEAR SO FAR IT IS LESS THAN 30. BUT SUSPICION IS A
00:20:46
PROBLEM AND ONE OF THE GREATEST AGAINST TO HUMANITY IN SOME WAYS VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN SUCCESS. PEOPLE DON'T DOUBT THEY NEED THE MEASLES VACCINE BUT...
Show Full Text
00:21:53
WONDERS AND THOSE THAT WERE VACCINATED FOR FLU HAVE GONE ON TV TO TELL THE STORY EACH YEAR WE LOSE 100 KIDS FROM INFLUENZA 90% AND NOT VACCINATED SO...
Show Full Text
00:22:36
DISEASE IS TOBACCO. >> TOBACCO USE CONTINUES TO KILL GLOBALLY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE MORE THAN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
00:22:53
COMBINED WITH THAT TOBACCO PREVENTION SERIOUSLY BUT PESETA POLICIES THAT CAN DRIVE SMOKING RATES DOWN WITH 400,000 HER AHEAD BUT IT IS INTERESTING...
Show Full Text
00:23:59
INTERVENTION WITH OVER AND UNDER NUTRITION SO SOME VERY SIMPLE THINGS LIKE BREAST FEEDING SIX MONTHS TO MAKE SURE THAT MOM HAS ACCESS TO GOOD NUTRITION...
Show Full Text
00:25:12
SMOKER. THERE ARE 10 MILLION FEWER SMOKERS AND 2009. IF YOU THINK OF THE OF PAYOFF THAT IS QUITE SUBSTANTIAL BUT THAT IS THE OF WRONG POCKET PROBLEM...
Show Full Text
00:26:19
WE COULD KEEP GOING BUT I WILL JUST MENTION
00:26:45
THAT HYPERTENSION IS THE SILENT
00:26:50
KILLER 70% OVER THE AGE OF 65 HAVE HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 30 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL POPULATION HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IN REDONDO OF VERY GOOD JOB WE SAID...
Show Full Text
00:28:05
HYPERTENSION VACCINATION SO INCREASINGLY P. OUR FOUNDATION WITH MANY PARTNERS AND GOVERNMENTS IS FOCUSED ON A FUNCTIONING HEALTH THE HEALTH SYSTEM. >>...
Show Full Text
00:28:43
COULD DO
00:28:47
ELABORATE ONE OF OUR BRAND AND NUTRITION PRODUCTS BUT IT COULD YOU ELABORATE FROM A POLIS THESE DAMN POINT? BUT BEYOND ADVOCACY OF THE PUBLIC POLICY...
Show Full Text
00:29:14
THERE IS PLENTY OF HOSPITALS THAT HAVE UNITS NAMED AFTER SOMEONE THEY HAVE CARED FOR NO HEALTH DEPARTMENT THAT HAS ONE THAT PREVENTED MANY MORE HEART...
Show Full Text
00:31:21
COMPLIANCE. INCREASINGLY IT IS SUSTAINED IN AND PART OF IT IS THE SENSE IS THAT YOU WILL SEE MORE OF OVERTIME. >> DO YOU HAVE AN IMPACT INTERESTED BY...
Show Full Text
00:32:11
THE >> THE COUNTRY'S COMEBACK WITH YELLOW OUTCOME HELL DO WE THINK ABOUT INCENTIVIZING THEM
00:32:42
TO SPEND PREVENTATIVE EXPENDITURE? >> WE HAVE TO BE COMMITTED TO FILL
00:33:03
THE GAPS WHEN SOMEONE IS GOING TO COME BACK OBJECTIVELY AND MEASURE AGAIN AND SAY YES YOUR INVESTMENT PAID OFF SO THE KEY IS THAT WE MOVE TO WORLD ...
Show Full Text
00:34:35
FLU. WE'VE BEEN CUTTING DAYS OR WEEK'S END INCREASING THE ABILITY TO PRODUCE THINGS THAT ARE RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE. WE HAVE MORE THAN 70 COUNTRIES INVOLVED...
Show Full Text
00:35:46
INVESTMENTS. >> ANY QUESTIONS? DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN WE HEARD A LOT ABOUT
00:36:04
OPIATES. >> THIS IS A PROBLEM. ININ THAT USB IS MORE THAN 80% OF THE GLOBAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATES.
00:36:19
THIS HAPPENED OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS, THE NUMBER OF OPIATES PRESCRIBED HAS INCREASED BY 300 TO 400%, AND THAT'S BEEN DIRECTLY CORRELATED WITH INCREASING...
Show Full Text
00:38:00
IN PAIN. IT HAS TO BE DONE WITH A SENSE OF URGENCY. WE'VE GOT ISWE THOUGHT IT THEN CONSISTENT WITH THOSE TYPES. >> CAN I ASK ANOTHER DRUG-RELATEDDRUG-RELATED...
Show Full Text
00:38:47
LEGALIZATION. I MADE A EVENT DRIVEN PERSON, WE NEED MORE EVEN THOUGH OUR DATA ON YOUNG PEOPLE AND THEIR LIVES THAT'S MY NUMBER ONE CONCERN IS. I THINK...
Show Full Text
00:40:16
AGREE. FROM THE BUSINESS STANDPOINT IT'S NEVER SEEMED OVER THE LAST HALF DECADE OR SO THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN VERY PROPHYLACTIC WAR SEE ACTIVE. I HAVEN'T...
Show Full Text
00:42:09
PRESENTATION. THEY CHANGED THE PRODUCTIVITY ON FARMS. ONE OF THE GREAT THING SEEMS THINGS THINGS WE HAVE IS TO PROTECT HOLDER. HOW DOES THAT CHANGE ANIMAL ...
Show Full Text
00:42:54
SO? SCENIC VIA SENSIBLE MODELS THE SENSIBLE MODELS FOR THE GOAL IS TO OPTIMIZE HEALTH WHICH IF YOU LOOK AT THE SYSTEM IT'S NOT A PERMANENT GOAL. THERE'S...
Show Full Text
*This text was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.
People in this video
Susan "Sue" Desmond-Hellmann M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Thomas "Tom" Frieden M.D.
Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
More People
Hosting Organization
[Wall Street Journal] | CEO Council
More Videos From
Prep for 'WSJ CEO COUNCIL 3:35p - 5pm
Wall Street Journal CEO Council, Senator Cotton
Wall Street Journal CEO Council, Senator Warren
More Videos
More information about
Wall Street Journal CEO Council, Global Health and Business Risk Panel
Purchase a Download
Wall Street Journal CEO Council, Global Health and Business Risk Panel
Related Video
See all on Foreign Aid Health Policy
Jennifer Haberkorn on Foreign Aid and Abortion
January 23, 2017
Jennifer Haberkorn on Foreign Aid and Abortion
Jennifer Haberkorn talked by video from Capitol Hill about the bill being debated that day that bans foreign aid going…
Tom Frieden on Public Health and Safety
September 10, 2013
Tom Frieden on Public Health and Safety
Tom Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, spoke about eminent dangers to health security,…
Chronic Disease Prevention
July 13, 2012
Chronic Disease Prevention
Panelists Ed Howard, Executive Vice President of Alliance for Health Reform, Ursula Bauer, Health Promotion Director of…
Bill Gates on Development Aid
April 5, 2011
Bill Gates on Development Aid
Bill Gates testified before the European Parliament about the health and education programs sponsored or performed by…
by Grizzly » Wed Mar 23, 2022 2:51 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:24 am
by Belligerent Savant » Fri Mar 25, 2022 12:04 pm
Date: 2022-03-25 02:19 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
A site called Daily Clout (dailyclout.io) is running a very interesting crowdsourced campaign to pore through the Pfizer document dumps and pull out anything interesting. I just watched their first volunteers meeting online - they're keen for anyone, particularly with medical training, to sign up and help.
1500 volunteers so far, close to 400 findings submitted from 55,000 pages of info. They have 250 volunteer lawyers ready to move. One of the hosts said there were potential civil and criminal offences in what's been found so far related to racketeering, RICO fraud, medical coercion, breach of contract and unlawful handling of business records.
According to the host of the meeting:
- 36 children were in the Pfizer trial, including a 2-month-old baby.
- a 90lb 12-year-old received the same dose as a 200lb male
- this seems like a big one - remember "the lipid nanoparticles stay in the injection site/deltoid"? It seems that the documents used by Pfizer for APPROVAL contain evidence that within 24-48 hours they'd entered the bloodstream and were accumulating in the lymph, ovaries, adrenal and spleen!
10,000 more pages to follow March 1. Long popcorn and pitchforks.
Pfizer Documents Analysis - WarRoom
Instructions for Volunteers - Which Docs Should I Review?
Thank you very much for helping with this effort!
We’ve formed a group of experienced pharmacological researchers, data analysts, doctors and attorneys that will be reviewing, collating and curating all of your research.
So, now we’d like you to focus on specific documents that we’ve identified as most important. In order to be sure we get deep focus on all of these documents, we’re asking each volunteer to focus on a specific document as follows:
Volunteers will focus on specific documents according to the first letter of their first name, as detailed below.
When you find something that you feel is important, submit your findings here. (submit the form once per finding.)
Once we have all gone through these key documents thoroughly, we’ll move on to the other documents and assign responsibility for other documents based on skills and experience.
To find these docs, go here, then find the document #, as shown below, corresponding to your Team/First Name.
Team 1: First Names starting with A thru C
#3 - 5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf - “Analysis of Adverse Events to end Feb 2021”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... rience.pdf
Team 2: First Names starting with D thru G
#19 - STN 125742_0_0 Section 2.5 Clinical Overview.pdf - “Clinical Overview”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... erview.pdf
Team 3: First Names starting with H thru K
#20 - STN 125742_0_0 Section 2.7.3 Summary of Clinical Efficacy.pdf - “Effectiveness of Vaccine - how much protection from COVID”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... ficacy.pdf
Team 4: First Names starting with L thru M
#21 - STN 125742_0_0 Section 2.7.4 summary-clin-safety.pdf - “Safety Profile of vaccine and adverse events”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... safety.pdf
Team 5: First Names starting with N thru R
#43 - 125742_S1_M2_24_nonclinical-overview.pdf - “NON CLINICAL OVERVIEW - needs thorough review”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... erview.pdf
Team 6: First Names starting with S thru Z
#58 - 125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-protocol.pdf - “Pfizer protocol double blind study amendment 3/2/21 (2346 pages)”
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... otocol.pdf
If you’re uncertain of what to look for, take a look at the findings submission form and the drop down of types of findings. But, don’t worry. Those that are experienced with this sort of research will look for the things they’re trained to look for. The rest of us will find things based on our own instincts.
Again, we have formed a team of experienced researchers that will be reviewing and consolidating your findings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
