I see an ideological gulf, of sorts, which is no surprise, since it’s been practically a
de rigueur feature of RI discussion since 2016. Or more accurately, maybe, a bulwark of ideology against awkward facts and annoying anomalies.
Dr. Evil always lives up to his name; splitting hairs about a comment in a 3.5 doc that is literally overflowing with (I would say) impossible-to-refute evidence of fakery in the Moon landing footage, and then presenting it as proof of the blanket dishonesty of the filmmakers. I wonder why the staunch defenders of the Moon hoax don’t at least admit that
some of the footage might have been faked, because it would give them way more leeway to argue that some of it is also real, and that yes, we really did conquer space, way back then, even if it led to nothing more than Teflon and a great big cognitive gulf war. Presumably it is because the idea of such fakery is itself unacceptable to them, either because a) they don’t like to think they could be fooled; or b) they refuse to believe the US government is capable of such rank deception. Either way, they seem to have wandered into the wrong party.
I repeat, that some of the Moon landing footage is fake is now, IMO, irrefutable. What remains is to discern why, how, and what exactly it proves besides that you can fool most of the people for a very long time, maybe indefinitely, because of precisely what my signature line says, i.e., the psychology of previous investment.
Back to the ideology, the belief a) that space travel is a good idea is an ideological position that goes hand in hand with a whole latticework of indoctrinated beliefs, i.e., state-sanctioned delusions, about human progress, manifest destiny, the will to power, etc. This belief/goal, I pretty much proved to my own satisfaction at least (with POI), is the result of a collective attachment disorder to Mama. In other words, just really fucked up, demonstrably the thin, hard edge of the transhumanist drive to escape physical reality and replace God/the soul with a crappy, tin-foiled covered and duct-tape reinforced Moon shuttle that even a child can spot as a fake. (Cf. emperor’s new clothes.)
b) The belief in NASA as a force of human progress/good is inseparable from a larger belief in (US) government and military institutions. It is, provably, wrong and beyond wrong, disingenuous, deluded, and just plain evil truth-doctoring, if pushed to its logical extreme, i.e., the avocation of a deadly mRNA “vaccine” now implementing a euthano-genocidal program of “species cleansing.”
On NASA’s involvement in child trafficking and ritual abuse, there is very little written about this, but the evidence is there, starting with the usual map of connections, timelines, and literal dead bodies. For the curious, you can try listening to my conversations with Gary Heidt, who grew up near a NASA base and believes that at least some of the sexual abuse he suffered as a child happened there.
https://auticulture.com/the-liminalist-37/https://auticulture.com/liminalist-93/I wonder if anyone here takes a point of view even vaguely supportive of Dr. Evil’s, if so, why they don’t speak up, and if not, why Dr. Evil spends so much time in a space where his point of view seems only able to continue via a frenzied and constant assertion of half-facts and hard opinions, all wrapped up inside a massive ideological brainwash that, I had always thought, RI is meant to be a haven from, or at least a continuous and robust challenge to.
If Evil is really serious that the 3.5 video that has impressed some of the best minds at RI as being the final nail in a rotten coffin of the Moon landing hoax, why doesn't he take the time to watch it all, and come up with a point-by-point rebuttal of the dozens of compelling arguments the film makes? As it is, he hasn’t even come up with a good, or even an honest, answer to the simple one raised, about the VA belt, and instead seems satisfied to keep insisting that he has addressed it. Since apparently his own “faith” in US space supremacy remains unfazed, only a moron can’t see how penetrating his arguments really are.
That’s all for now; over to the well-named Belligerent Savage (thank God for the other kind of BS!).
It is a lot easier to fool people than show them how they have been fooled.