by Nordic » Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:07 pm
From an amazing researcher and poster on FB named Kathleen League
I've recently become aware that researchers such as Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt argue that--based on relevant documents and contracts they've viewed between Pf#zer and the DoD (but the implication is that these findings may be applicable to all c#v#d v@xxines?)--creation of the c#v#d v#xes was done under the aegis of the DoD as a special category of military operation, under the category of 'Other Transaction Authority.' This operation began before 2020. According to Latypova and Watts, under this military aegis, no clinical trials were required for the product, because the real point wasn't the nature of the product per se. The main point of the exercise was to experiment with sped-up large-scale manufacturing processes for creating and delivering these genetic-experiment 'v@xxines', which she says are militarily viewed in this case as b#owarfare agents.
Subsequently, Latypova maintains, no proper trials were done, but only the appearance of some clinical trials were done for public window dressing. (This fits with what the British Medical Journal, in the editorial piece by senior editor Peter Doshi, boldly claimed in late 2020: that the c#v#d v3x clinical trials were so inadequate that they proved nothing with regard to either safety or efficacy.)
Furthermore, Latypova argues, 'operation warp speed' was conducted under the military lingo of ‘countermeasures’ and ‘prototypes,’ not under the lingo of ‘v@ccines.’ So, her argument goes, this exercise was committed as a military 'countermeasure.' She believes that in the normal legal sense, this puts the 'products' beyond liability and fraud. Not that fraud wasn't committed; she says fraud was committed. However, she sees the fraud as located in a 'legal' space that, while she views it as treasonous, unfortunately is functionally nonprosecutable in the court system, or at the least certainly very difficult to prosecute.
Latypova also argues that the DoD focus on large, scaled-up manufacturing processes for 'b#owarfare countermeasures', without any regard for adequate testing on small batches first, has resulted in shoddy products, to say the least. (Actually, she calls them 'mass m#rder' agents.)
Latypova also expresses the opinion that the DoD isn't even the top of the food chain in this arrangement. She believes there is a head of the snake further back in the global banking industry.
More recently, Latypova has taken the leap of expressing the opinion that the c#v#d 'lab-leak' theory (now recently more broadly and officially accepted), is another level of red herring. This more recent claim from Latypova involves a highly speculative position that, as far as I can tell, she is not providing evidence for, unlike with the Pf#zer contract. But she believes this is all part of a more deliberate b#owarfare 'gaming'.
First, Latypova says, there was the requisite p@ndemic. It was deliberately engineered, she believes, not a matter of a 'lab leak.' (She seems to believe the agents are biochemical toxins rather than v#ral agents.)
Second, the v#xes were devised under the rubric of experimental military 'countermeasures.' (This is one place where I don't quite follow Latypova's position: if the disease agents are b#ochemical toxins, and not v#ruses, as Latypova seems to suggest, then why would v#xes be the 'countermeasure'? Then again, since the 'countermeasures' are not true v#xes, but are actually genetic tools, this could maybe fit together. But yet further, if the genetic experiments are not really intended as solid working products, but as prototype exercises for large-scale manufacturing and delivery systems, then how are they 'countermeasures' of anything?)
Some of this gets very murky indeed. But the gist of Latypova's overall position seems to be that a government/pharma consortium, guided by a shady global banking directive, has engaged in wanton and irresponsible 'experimentation', first with a p@ndemic exercise, and then with coercing the frightened population into taking rushed 'countermeasures'. The implication seems to be an experimentation with mass fear and mass compliance as much as anything, and involving a kind of unhinged 'mad science'.
At any rate, Latypova sees the 'accidental lab leak' as more fake news. She doesn't see it as accidental, but deliberate. If the release was deliberate, then the ‘lab leak’ story is a distraction from that. She implicates the WHO as part of the machination. Does she think the DoD and China were in a sense collaborating together on this b#owarfare project? Or merely that the DoD, via NIH and EcoHealth, used a Chinese lab as a front for a manfactured p@ndemic? But of course, once again, in her view, back of it all is the global banking system so everything is coordinated at an unseen level for 'hidden' ends that are not officially acknowledged. It's quite the rabbit hole.
Latypova's reading of the DoD/Pf#zer contract seems substantial and worth reckoning with, because she can point to the dodgy wording in the relevant contract. Her more recent claim, however, where she seems to implicate DoD and WHO and other shady agents with the release of toxic agents for a deliberate p@ndemic, no lab leak needed, but something actually deliberately contrived, looks more speculative and out-on-a-limb at this point. However, of course, given the predictive programming of p@ndemic exercises conducted shortly before the p@ndemic, many have speculated similar scenarios.
The following three sections are from three essays by Latypova where she delves into these topics.
*********
Latypova, February 18, 2023:
"These b#owarfare agents ... designed and developed by many parties including DARPA, NIH, other gov agencies, academia and private companies ... as pre-planning and practice runs for 'the p@ndemic,' had gone on for years. In the years immediately preceding 2020, the program was led by DOD Emerging Technologies, DARPA and BARDA and was called 'pan-influenza v@ccine manufacturing base.' It was super important to the US Government to 'keep it warm' and cozy and flush with money so they could protect us from the future 'p@ndemic' they themselves created. ...
"I would like to clarify that I do not 'shift the blame to DOD.' The blame is on both DOD and Pf#zer as collaborators in the global mass m#rder campaign. My question - under what scenario do you believe the FD@ would NOT authorize these injections? I have documented their (and EMA, MHRA and Health Canada) clear decision to authorize the shots before reviewing any data from clinical trials ...
"Preclinical studies were likewise irrelevant to the decision to 'approve' these injections, and were composed of fraud, manipulation of data, use of irrelevant test articles and non-compliance with enforceable parts of regulatory guidance. This included an outright false claim made by the FD@ on behalf of M#derna regarding v@ccine-related skeletal malformations in babies of v@ccinated rats. ...
"[Attorney Robert Barnes claims that}: 'In this case, the prototype was not the v@ccine, but the method used to create it – a wide scale, sped-up process of producing medical countermeasures in a pandemic for national security and future military use. The prototype was the process, not the product.' ...
"The main problem with the above statement--it assumes that a safe pharmaceutical can be made by a 'prototype' manufacturing process. That is a naive assumption. A well-intentioned FD@ performing as an honest regulator would have never made this 'mistake'. ...
"In pharmaceutical manufacture there is no possibility of having a 'prototype process' delivering a 'safe product,' especially in quantities of billions of doses. Everyone involved in setting up the global 'v@ccine' disaster were fully aware of this. ...
"Noncompliance with cGMP means that no statements about safety or efficacy of anything can be made at all, because IT IS NOT KNOWN WHAT IS BEING MADE. ...
"It is important that drugs are manufactured under conditions and practices required by the cGMP regulations to assure that quality is built into the design and manufacturing process at every step.
"The FD@ knows all this and always have known this ...
"Under what scenario do you think the FD@ 'FORGETS' THIS? Under what scenario do you think the government gives a private company $10 billion and a PREP Act and orders a 'prototype process' to deliver 'safe and effective' potion, when the government knows full well this cannot be done? ...
"About the term 'weapons':
“'Gene therapy as a weapon' has been a known category of biological weapons according to the US Government/DOD reports since at least 1997. Renaming a technology into 'v@ccines' did not change the technology, it just renamed it. (Kind of like 'directed evolution' vs 'gain of function,' same difference). The mRN@ tech is just as weaponizable as before renaming. The use of these injections is currently indistinguishable from their use as weapons because there is no reliable and controlled manufacturing process, nor a transparent and traceable pharmaceutical distribution chain. They are ordered by the DOD under Other Transaction Authority, made by defense suppliers, distributed by the DOD in a completely opaque chain, and owned by the DOD until injected. ...
"The contract [with Pf#zer] is very curiously written. ... I have negotiated a number of contracts and this particular one seems very odd to me ... It says this - pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and chemistry manufacturing controls (i.e. all the parts that constitute regulatory compliance) are OUT OF SCOPE of the contract. They are not ordered and not paid for by the DOD. ...
"In the 'Deliverables' section, the contract writers describe the cGMP [Current Good Manufacturing Practice] correctly and even cite applicable law! Does this mean Pf#zer is on the hook?
"Not really. It appears that this deliverable only requires Pf#zer to WRITE A PLAN. This section is NOT about being in compliance with these laws, but about writing an essay on how you would potentially do it. The acceptance criteria stated in the section for this item is that the Government/DOD will 'review' it. That’s it.
"This is in part the confirmation of what I and Katherine have been describing as 'playacting' on behalf of Pf#zer and FDA, creating 'props' for a propaganda/b#owarfare to be waged on the public (such as this 'Manufacturing Development Plan' or a 'Quality Plan'. Not a real pharmaceutical compliance process. I also wonder why the sections are so heavily redacted - cGMP/quality are not 'proprietary' items. ...
"Pf#zer saw all the loopholes included in this contract by the DOD contract writers. However, the DOD/HHS/FDA also lied by countersigning the contract - nobody involved in this are idiots or naive. Prior to that moment there had been about 20 years of regulatory knowledge of failures to make a safe and manufacturable mRN@ product, and not a single success.
"An example of the regulatory knowledge can be found in the 2015 FD@ Guidance for gene therapy products, including v@ccines: ... it stated that manufacture of these products was an extremely difficult problem. It stated in another section that it was generally not acceptable to even test these products on healthy volunteers, because the risks were too high. For reasons including lack of safety, absence of reliable 'therapeutic window' (a dose that would be generally safe for a large and identifiable population), and lack of manufacturing success all previous attempts at putting mRN@ products on the market failed. The FD@ knew this history very well. ...
"In full knowledge that the clauses cited from the DOD-Pf#zer contract could not be possibly implemented, the DOD and Pf#zer both signed that contract.
"If you see the US Government/DOD signing a contract with a private company which promises to deliver flying unicorns that fart rainbows in exchange for $10 billion - you should suspect that both parties signing this contract are in cahoots to defraud the taxpayer. In fact they do this routinely, printing and spending money on various scams so why is anyone surprised. Unfortunately, the False Claims Act does not contemplate a scenario where the government is committing fraud in cahoots with a private company, so I completely understand the frustration inherent in pursuing this under FCA."
*******
Latypova, February 28, 2023, on the contract between Pf#zer and the DoD. To summarize: she notes that the middleman for the contract signing was ATI--a company favored by DoD for Other Transaction Authority agreements for use in secrecy and avoiding accountability. She lambasts what she characterizes as a focus on creating a scaled-up complex system before creating a solidly tested product, resulting in shoddy products:
"An attorney once told me 'you cannot contract for a crime.' I think this is very true, and I think ultimately the truth will prevail. In the meantime, let’s talk about the art of writing contracts for giving future crimes appearance of lawful acts. Here is a lesson brought to you by your government-military-industrial complex. ...
"This post is Part 1 of the series that will cover publicly available Pf#zer-ATI-MCDC-DOD-FDA-HHS contracts that have been disclosed to the public through Jackson v. Ventavia, Pf#zer and ICON.
"DOD-Pfizer Base Agreement.
"This agreement was signed on July 20, 2020 between Advanced Technology International (ATI), located in Summerville, SC and Pfizer, Inc., New York (NY). ATI is the Consortium Management Firm (CMF) managing several industry consortia for the Department of Defense purchasing various things that they need. An eye-watering amount of money flows through this company, which is a specialist in 'Other Transaction Authority' contracts - i.e. a way of contracting favored by the DOD because accountability and regulatory compliance can be avoided, and lots of secrecy can be maintained. ATI manages consortia that primarily make weapons and things related to defense. There are two consortia that have 'biopharma' and health related companies in it, working on so-called dual-use (civilian and military) technologies. The consortium that is responsible for making 'covid countermeasures' managed by ATI is called MEDICAL CBRN [Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear] DEFENSE CONSORTIUM (MCDC).
"I will review some key sections of this contract - the ones I find particularly relevant to how we ended up with 'legal' (on paper) mass genocide of Americans and global population through a pretend 'v@ccination campaign' and under largely faked 'public health emergency.' ...
"I agree that pharmas are very bad, corrupt, and are in the criminal cartel that’s committing worldwide murder. The head of the cartel is not the pharma, however, and I believe that a proper investigation and prosecution strategy must take this view. Note that I also do not think that the US DOD is the ultimate head of the operation - they are the executor, the global military enforcement structure. They are the Chief Operating Officer and the CEO is someplace else. The head of the snake is located somewhere towards the global banking area. My post is about the immediate structure we are dealing with: DOD-FDA-Pharma as evidenced by their own written agreements.
"These contracts are written by the Government, by the Department of Defense and not by private pharmaceutical companies. The discussion below relates to the specifics of what these contracts state.
"Review of specific clauses in the 'Base Agreement'.
>>Section 1.03 Scope:
>>Under the OTA [Other Transaction Authority] and associated Project Agreements, the Government along with the Consortium member entities, shall perform coordinated planning and research and development prototype efforts in support of the JPM-MCS mission [Join Project Manager for Medical Countermeasure Systems] through the development of products in three (3) major Medical Countermeasure Systems (MCS) objective areas:
>>Detection: Systems and devices to identify CBRN [Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear] agents and assist in making medical decisions
>>Prevention: Prophylaxis, pretreatment, and post-exposure prophylaxis
>>Treatment: Therapeutics (post-exposure, post-symptomatic)
>>The Government will determine which endeavors to pursue and projects to fund.
>>Section 1.04 Goals/Objectives” as it relates to therapeutic products:
>>Deliver therapeutic MCM [Medical Countermeasures] prototypes targeting viral, bacterial, and biological toxin targets of interest to the DOD. MCM prototypes are drug products that have completed all or part of the activities required to support FDA licensure. This may include meeting warfighter requirements of protection against an aerosolized route of exposure.<<
...
"Interesting here: the drugs produced under this framework do not have to comply with the FD@ regulations for pharmaceutical drugs - they can be partially tested, if at all. What does 'part of activities' even mean - a cell culture? An 8-mouse experiment that failed? It is not surprising to anyone paying attention: this is an OTA contract, no regulations are necessary. And of course when one is making a prototype, it does not need to be fully baked. What is a prototype? ...
"Prototype is a mock-up, a rough draft, something that helps visualize of plan a product, not a fully functioning, fully usable (especially not on mass scale) product. So why would you expect a prototype drug (or v@ccine) to be safe and efficacious, or protective? ...
"Without the 'prototype' language, the DOD could not use the OTA funding and contracting mechanism at all. They would have to use proper, accountable and regulated contracting methods instead. ...
"Here is the language about 'v@ccines' that would be ordered through this contract structure. They are ordering another research-y/prototype-y thing, but they call it a 'manufacturing platform':
>>Develop vaccine-manufacturing platforms that offer early stage manufacturing flexibility and diversity using a deep knowledge of protein(s) expression in a biological system that is reproducible and scalable, and preferably with direct FD@ experience. The goal is to manufacture and test identified protective molecule(s) and target molecule(s) (along with associated reagents and standards) in multiple scalable, flexible manufacturing platforms encompassing a diverse array of manufacturing systems (e.g., insect, mammalian, live viral, plant, E.coli, yeast, etc.) for use in appropriate animal model(s) and in Phase 1 trials.<<
"Note that the goal of this effort is not fully tested v@ccines that comply with cGxP laws. Instead it’s 'flexible manufacturing platforms' encompassing 'diversity' of manufacturing systems. ... None of these terms are defined, so this is an eye-of-the-beholder thing, open to interpretation, disputes and ultimately probably unenforceable. ...
"From my experience in the industry, manufacturing at scale is not needed (and is counterproductive) when the product is being tested in animal and even Phase 1 trials, because the quantities of drug material required are very small. Investment into large scale manufacturing too far ahead of approval can tank the whole company: it is a very expensive and custom undertaking, if the product fails, the factory is largely wasted, and if the product needs re-working the manufacturing process may need significant and costly changes too. Complexity as 'many types of manufacturing' is counterproductive: as you work out the manufacturing process to be reliable, compliant, well characterized, the simpler the better for troubleshooting. This reasoning would be typical of private investors funding a legitimate product development and wishing to systematically de-risk the process. Do not scale before the last possible moment, work out all the problems in a smaller, easier to understand system first. Why is the Government aiming to do the opposite of this - a shoddy prototype made in a scaled up super complex system? One possible reason - it is easier to hide fraud in a super-complex, compartmentalized systems where nobody knows the whole process from start to finish. ...
"The key distinction here is that this Consortium is NOT a regulated and liable group of companies! That’s the trick, kids. It’s a Government-Corporate structure that is using National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Other Transaction Authority (OTA) to make not pharmaceuticals, not regulated products, for which they face no liability.
They also do not invest at risk capital. When the Government 'invests' they never risk the money. They can always print more of it. ...
"While clearly, three entities (two government and one corporate) are involved, it seems to me that the regulator (the FD@) is under the control of the DOD and so is the evil big pharma. The evil big pharma is fully collaborating in exchange for the sweet, sweet $10 billion. If Pf#zer says no to this contract, the DOD-FD@ can select from dozens of suppliers eager to attach themselves to the government spigot. MCDC consortium has 320 members! No particular expertise is needed either, the whole thing is about prototypes, i.e. fake things! ...
"I realize a lot of pharma criticism has to do with their coziness with the FD@, the revolving doors, and all that. All true. However, those are informal, person-to-person, being in the club types of things. Trading of favors exists and is very real. But here we have the whole different level of blatant control. This is a contract, that specifies that a private (publicly traded) company will turn over ALL insider knowledge of the regulatory approval of the product to the DOD and ATI (the manager). No restrictions. No regulations cited. ..."
*********
Latypova, February 26, 2023:
"Lab Leak is baloney. I hope you can see it now as it is being unveiled in the most unsubtle way right on cue before WHO pandemic treaty is being put in place.
"They are trotting this earthshattering breaking story now, finally telling you the 'truth' (yeah, we lied a little bit about pangolins and bats, but it was for your own good, silly peasants!) because WHO treaty is happening now, and they need everyone to fall in line supporting the global totalitarian biosecurity state, where the unelected overlords will 'protect you' from 'lab leaks from enemies and rogue scientists,' by putting you in 15-minute prisons, I mean smart cities, and murdering you with protective military prototype 'v@ccines.' ...
"Please don’t fall for this narrative. There are no lab leaks. There is deliberate deployment of bio-chemical warfare agents, toxins of various kinds, including nano-scale particles by which materials that are not terribly harmful can become much more so. This deployment can be done via aerosols, formulations in food, transdermal, etc. These are deployed by the military enforcement arm of the global banking cartel, and they do not hold allegiance to any people or nations. The 'unrestricted 5-th gen warfare' is not simply fake news on social media and lots of brainwashing, it is an actual elimination of people from this planet, and we are the targets."
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
