Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Aug 01, 2023 5:11 pm

Slothrop
@gnocchiwizard
·
In the wake of the advent of civilian intelligence, propaganda became a feature of daily life. no longer an aberration conjured up to generate support for war, intelligence became concerned with EVERYTHING and EVERYONE, and propaganda became more complex and entirely trippier.

intelligence continued knowingly disseminating falsehoods in order to manufacture support for its desired wars, the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction being obvious examples.

now, did the journalists at NYTimes who wrote, edited and published those stories know they were lying? it's quite likely they did not. the generals who commanded the war also likely believed the casus belli. putting aside this sincerity, they were still LIES.

past manufacturing consent for wars, western intelligence got into weirder territory. sprawling human experiments into the possibility of mind control, active measures to infiltrate and destabilize domestic political threats, these conspiracies are just known. no theory about it.

...which brings me, at long last, to covid. it is inconceivable to me that western intelligence was uninvolved in the media driven panic based on carefully crafted falsehoods, that they had no say in the drastic, sudden, and comprehensive restructuring of human society.

that i cannot name the specific conspirators is insignificant. it also doesn't matter that journalists, politicians, bureaucrats and public health officials all sincerely believed they were telling the truth. they really thought they were trying to save lives. so fucking what?

respectable dissidents tend to deride the notion that this was all done on purpose for reasons not made public. they mock the idea of bond villains twisting their mustaches in private, cackling over their deceitful plots. These people do not understand the history of propaganda.

why was the laughably fraudulent imperial college model front paged by the New York Times in march of 2020, just like the Gulf of Tonkin, The Maine, Saddam's WMDs?

the brilliance of covid was taking tools usually reserved for war propaganda, and using them instead for a "public health" initiative. even most people who studied propaganda failed to perceive it in action, because instead of generals, it was doctors giving press conferences.

...in propaganda, lies are disseminated on purpose, in order to affect unstated policy goals that would otherwise be impossible in democracies.

https://twitter.com/gnocchiwizard/statu ... 19805?s=20
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Grizzly » Tue Aug 22, 2023 11:31 pm



Emails reveal California Health Dept. told county officials to be quiet about secret lab

I may have already posted this... I forget.
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Grizzly » Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:53 pm

follow up?
Proposed ordinance following discovery of illegal lab in Central California
Fresno councilmembers announcing proposed Infectious Disease Lab Accountability and Transparency ordinance after discovery of secret lab in Reedley.



from comments
Gavin Newsome gave a $360,000.00 tax break to this Fresno lab in 2019
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby stickdog99 » Thu Aug 24, 2023 7:02 pm

stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Grayzone & CJ Hopkins

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:04 pm

1. Doesn't matter what problems I have with the Hopkins style, or that I see comparison of mask-wearing to Nazi armbands as incredibly stupid and, worse, politically destructive. His conviction in Germany for a tweet and book cover is bad bad news.

2. I haven't explored the details of the new EU regulations on Internet and the consequences globally but expect yet another step to an arbitrary, unaccountable, increasingly blanket online censorship regime.

3. GoFundMe suddenly suspended payout on the Grayzone fundraiser due to outside complaints and apparently this means they don't get the money? But do the donors get refunds? Wtf?

Satirist and author CJ Hopkins was found guilty and sentenced to 60 days in prison or a 3600 Euro fine by a German court for a single tweet mocking mask mandates, and for the cover of his book, "The New Normal Reich," which examines pandemic restrictions and the propaganda surrounding them as symbols of a new authoritarian order in the liberal West.

CJ joins The Grayzone's Max Blumenthal to discuss his conviction for violating Germany's unusual speech codes and what it says about the future of liberal democracy in Europe.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Harvey » Thu Aug 31, 2023 6:13 pm

And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4200
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat Sep 09, 2023 11:12 am

Belligerent Savant » Sat Sep 09, 2023 10:11 am wrote:Image

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 800723007/

Biden administration coerced social media giants into possible free speech violations: court

September 8 2023

Jessica Guynn
USA TODAY

The White House, health officials and the FBI may have violated the First Amendment rights of people posting about COVID-19 and elections on social media by pressuring technology companies to suppress or remove the posts, a federal appeals court ruled late Friday.

The decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals partly upheld an order from a Louisiana federal judge that blocked many federal agencies from having contact with companies like Facebook, YouTube and X, formerly Twitter, about content moderation.

...
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Grizzly » Sat Sep 16, 2023 12:34 am

https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1702122741829169302
Tech tycoons with a combined net worth of roughly $550 billion gathered in the same room today for a Senate forum on the future and regulation of AI, per Bloomberg: (Your Gods).

US Supreme Court Issues Emergency Order
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4907
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Sep 17, 2023 12:37 pm

Related and applicable across a few threads here.

User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby Belligerent Savant » Wed Sep 20, 2023 9:38 am

.
We are being primed for an aggressive and overt form of ‘social credit’ enforcement, when decisions are made unilaterally by entities — financial institutions, govts, and large corporate orgs that are ostensibly not operated by govts — without any form of due process.

Among other affronts being aggressively ‘tested’ on first world countries en masse since late 2019.


Image

https://x.com/MurielBlaivePhD/status/17 ... 86434?s=20
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Sep 23, 2023 1:56 pm

Image
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby DrEvil » Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:28 pm

Belligerent Savant » Wed Sep 20, 2023 3:38 pm wrote:.
We are being primed for an aggressive and overt form of ‘social credit’ enforcement, when decisions are made unilaterally by entities — financial institutions, govts, and large corporate orgs that are ostensibly not operated by govts — without any form of due process.

Among other affronts being aggressively ‘tested’ on first world countries en masse since late 2019.


Image

https://x.com/MurielBlaivePhD/status/17 ... 86434?s=20


She's confusing the right to due process with the right to a soapbox on someone else's property, and she's acting like being ostracized is somehow new and novel. Maybe he's innocent, maybe he's not, it doesn't matter. People are going to have opinions about it no matter what, and Youtube's opinion is obviously that they don't want to be associated with him right now, which is their right. They're an advertising business, not a charity. The alternative is to force them to carry speech they don't want to be associated with, which is a huge can of worms. There's plenty of legal speech that most sane people wouldn't want to touch with a ten foot pole.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Sep 23, 2023 8:07 pm

DrEvil » 23 Sep 2023 20:28 wrote:
Belligerent Savant » Wed Sep 20, 2023 3:38 pm wrote:.
We are being primed for an aggressive and overt form of ‘social credit’ enforcement, when decisions are made unilaterally by entities — financial institutions, govts, and large corporate orgs that are ostensibly not operated by govts — without any form of due process.

Among other affronts being aggressively ‘tested’ on first world countries en masse since late 2019.


Image

https://x.com/MurielBlaivePhD/status/17 ... 86434?s=20


She's confusing the right to due process with the right to a soapbox on someone else's property, and she's acting like being ostracized is somehow new and novel. Maybe he's innocent, maybe he's not, it doesn't matter. People are going to have opinions about it no matter what, and Youtube's opinion is obviously that they don't want to be associated with him right now, which is their right. They're an advertising business, not a charity. The alternative is to force them to carry speech they don't want to be associated with, which is a huge can of worms. There's plenty of legal speech that most sane people wouldn't want to touch with a ten foot pole.



LOL. If youtube doesn't want to be associated with Brand, why not pull his channel?

Why leave his channel while stealing his promised cut of the revenue his channel generates?

"Corporate media has dug up some anonymous sources who accuse him of committing serious crimes. Thus, our only ethical recourse is to steal his money!"


And since when is government in the business of pressuring corporations to financially penalize individuals based on anonymous allegations?

Innocent until proven anti-establishment?
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby DrEvil » Mon Sep 25, 2023 4:57 pm

They should, definitely. If they don't like him they should boot his ass instead of pulling this shady shit, but whatever fuckery Youtube is up to with Brand has nothing to do with his rights. He doesn't have the right to have a Youtube channel, or to make money off them. All of that is entirely divorced from his right to due process in criminal proceedings.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Suppression/Propaganda in Media

Postby stickdog99 » Mon Sep 25, 2023 5:49 pm

DrEvil » 25 Sep 2023 20:57 wrote:They should, definitely. If they don't like him they should boot his ass instead of pulling this shady shit, but whatever fuckery Youtube is up to with Brand has nothing to do with his rights. He doesn't have the right to have a Youtube channel, or to make money off them. All of that is entirely divorced from his right to due process in criminal proceedings.


Does the UK government have the right to threaten private entities not to do business with a citizen because decades-old anonymous allegations were made against this citizen?

I mean, regardless of your personal disdain for Brand and/or defense of any corporate punishment of him, don't you think this sets a bad precedent? Can you think of a single example of something like this happening in the past in the public domain in any supposedly free nation?
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests