And, regarding the Walt Disney topic itself, Slomo said it pretty well, as far as I am concerned:
slomo wrote:As for Disney, who gives a fuck, the guy's dead; this is a problem only if they succeed in reanimating his frozen head.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
slomo wrote:As for Disney, who gives a fuck, the guy's dead; this is a problem only if they succeed in reanimating his frozen head.
Is this a windup? Is this a windup I see before me?82_28 wrote:How can you say Idiocracy was "rubbish"? WTF ever. The film was brilliant and needed to be made. It was made.
What was wrong with Idiocracy?
Find the astonishing answer to your question on this thread:82_28 wrote:How can you say Idiocracy was "rubbish"? WTF ever. The film was brilliant and needed to be made. It was made.
What was wrong with Idiocracy?
brekin wrote: Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, Christina Agulieura, etc may just be the most recent victims of his legacy and may play into a greater system in which Walt Disney was just a part. I don't need to remind people on the forum about MK Ultra, Monarch, etc. Seems a high placed person like Walt with a huge cultural influence on the hearts and minds of children would be a great asset.
Oh god, this is wearisome. Britney Spears, Timberlake, & Aguilara are all former Disney kids. Timberlake went on to N'Sync managed by Lou Perlman a known pedophile. Each at times has appeared to have mental problems and there have been allegations of being controlled and groomed as "professional entertainers" and continue to be huge influences in our culture. Walt Disney being a possible exploiter of children who has built an empire that still stands makes an examination of those who are connected totally reasonable.brekin wrote:
Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, Christina Agulieura, etc may just be the most recent victims of his legacy and may play into a greater system in which Walt Disney was just a part. I don't need to remind people on the forum about MK Ultra, Monarch, etc. Seems a high placed person like Walt with a huge cultural influence on the hearts and minds of children would be a great asset.
Just, wow.
..........
I have a few suggestions.
Instead of speculating about celebrities, you might remember that you are directly addressing real, not supposed, survivors of MK ULTRA related experimentation. Consider we may have other priorities than Britney Spears, not to mention the numerous ethical problems with, oh nevermind.
Again, this about Walt Disney and his allegations and where they may lead. I don't know if it is connected to MKULTRA or associated programs but I'm not going to dismiss the chance. If this is triggering for you or disturbing then I suggestSpeculating about celebrities is a game-like activity encouraged by conspirotainment sites that promulgate disinformation to cover-up the real crimes and human rights abuses of MKULTRA, and profit from the suffering of others, including us survivors on this board, consider that it might not be the best idea to encourage it here.
I'd love to see past accounts if you have the time or if someone else can post them. I don't think there is anything wrong with posing the question whether or not Disney's allegations wouldn't dovetail with other similar programs. And please don't feel you have to discuss possible connections, I just ask you respect other's right to do so.Also, there is no evidence that any of the CIA, DOD, or other governmental agency-sponsored experiment programs into behavior control was named Monarch. In fact, the evidence suggests that project name was introduced as deliberate disinformation.
There absolutely are connections to Disney businesses in MC and child trafficking accounts, but there's no way I am going to discuss them in this thread. We've reviewed some of them in past threads I am fairly certain, if anyone wants to track them down.
No. Not how I am wired.bks wrote:So can I ask you, Wombaticus, did you consider placing quotation marks around "gay pedophile" before deleting "gay"? Curious to know. And to others: would you have objected to quotes being placed around the offending phrase in the title?
You know, Wombat, I'm not much for religion anymore, but I do have a soft spot for people like Siddhartha and Francis. So... I truly admire that.Wombaticus Rex wrote:I recently burned most of my possessions because I no longer wanted to deal with their existence.
Yes and the invasion happens because we become convinced that we need someone to protect us from the wolfs. How does the wolf learn to so completely divorce their inner and outer expressions of personality and to fool so many into seeing their outer expression as being their deepest interior concern?His war propaganda films alone illustrated his alliance with extremist mind invaders.
I agree, although we all are bound to work out our personal issues in the style best suited to where we are at the moment. I would not want to devalue cathartic opportunities of anyone, unless they were physically attacking me at the moment. Then I might devalue it real quick.To dismiss or limit discussion of that facet of this analysis of recent revelations about the man and his legacy would be ridiculous at best and coercive censorship at its worst.