Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Post Reply
User avatar
seemslikeadream
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by seemslikeadream »

Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:15 pm wrote:
seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:00 pm wrote:that doesn't mean it is not the truth
If it's the problem doesn't mean that it is.

If a nation chooses to be corralled, how would it sing of it's captivity except as blessed? There was no choice right?

If a nation chooses to be corralled....could you provide proof of that statement please?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Iamwhomiam »

Sounder » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 am wrote:
JR:
That you are probably a repulsive slug in real life is likely...

...when your very pat and simplistic and often fact-free views...

I guess you must harbor a lot of anger...

All this suggests a very immature person...

...it suggests a man who is probably very frustrated and hateful at having to deal with people who are smarter than him... (my personal favourite - condescending and using intelligence as a weapon)

I'm guessing you might have got lousy SATs...

You could learn, but you prefer to make apologies...

One can actually be a lot more than a hateful slug...
dodger wrote...
This constant, unremitting belittlement of the intellectual capacity of anyone in disagreement is so indicative of elitist thinking structures.
It's losing its power quickly, though.

My favorite is; I guess you must harbor a lot of anger...

Smart people are considered smart because they are the ones that know best how to converse and convince in terms of our current 'categories of understanding'. Therefor they are most responsible for the maintenance of intellectual structures, our dominant narrative. They are then the ones responsible for the messed-upness in this world, not regular people.

Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit.
Wow! Sounder, that is one very smart post.
User avatar
Harvey
Posts: 4242
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
spambot: no
Contact:

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Harvey »

seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:18 pm wrote:
Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:15 pm wrote:
seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:00 pm wrote:that doesn't mean it is not the truth
If it's the problem doesn't mean that it is.

If a nation chooses to be corralled, how would it sing of it's captivity except as blessed? There was no choice right?

If a nation chooses to be corralled....could you provide proof of that statement please?
Poetic license.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
JackRiddler
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by JackRiddler »

Iamwhomiam » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:20 pm wrote:Wow! Sounder, that is one very smart post.
Yeah, seriously. It must be the smartest post ever on this board. Sounder is a very, very smart guy. As he argues, he's responsible for this mess of a world and one cannot trust him.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
dada
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Contact:

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by dada »

Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.

I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.

We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
It's metaphorical.

I disagree. The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
Rory
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Rory »

dada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:14 pm wrote:
Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.

I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.

We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
It's metaphorical.

I disagree. The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind
Someone tell that to the chimps
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Iamwhomiam »

Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:02 am wrote:
JackRiddler » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:01 pm wrote:
Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:54 am wrote:Some automated server just blurted out the results of the election (apparently this is a grab of the page) according to Jim Stone:

http://82.221.129.208/basepaget1.html

Anything leap out? BS?
"Soros and his minions will steal the election and make it illegal to stop them" sort of leaps out, yes.
Anything beside the obvious..? I read that he's 'controversial' figure, okay. Is there anything to the story? I don't have relevant knowledge in order to judge.
I believe all news services have prepared ahead of time their lead story for whomever wins, leaving out the finer details, just so they're ready to go to press after a slight editorial touch-up. I wouldn't doubt another would be found there announcing Trump the winner.
User avatar
dada
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Contact:

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by dada »

Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:16 pm wrote:Someone tell that to the chimps
I'll try reading 'Listen, Little Man' to them next time we're sitting around the campfire.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
slimmouse
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by slimmouse »

Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit
Hey Jack, you cocksucker, you missed this bit.

That would be you jack. Along with several others around this place who dont have the fuckn brains they were born with, despite claiming such.

Im out of here.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
spambot: no
Location: Vermontistan

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Wombaticus Rex »

slimmouse » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:25 pm wrote:
Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit
Hey Jack, you cocksucker, you missed this bit.

That would be you jack. Along with several others around this place who dont have the fuckn brains they were born with, despite claiming such.

Im out of here.
That you are. :thumbsup
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by MacCruiskeen »

dada wrote:The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind.
Very true. Persuading people that that software is actually hardware has been one of the most successful enterprises in a forty-year mass-media programming process. "Your genes are selfish and so are you." "Complaining about your rulers just proves you want to be a ruler too." "You know you really want to beat your wife and kids, why won't you admit it? Read some SCIENCE, man."

It's been just one element in a sustained reactionary pushback against the big scare of the Sixties.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
seemslikeadream
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by seemslikeadream »

Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:16 pm wrote:
dada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:14 pm wrote:
Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.

I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.

We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
It's metaphorical.

I disagree. The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind
Someone tell that to the chimps
Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
Rory
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Rory »

dada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:21 pm wrote:
Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:16 pm wrote:Someone tell that to the chimps
I'll try reading 'Listen, Little Man' to them next time we're sitting around the campfire.
The original german, or the english translation? Either way, the subtleties of Reich's argument will surely assist them as they liberate us with their teeth from our worldly delusions about hardware and software.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Iamwhomiam »

Luther Blissett » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:33 pm wrote:I added it to the Prediction Data Dump: only conservative justices from here on out.

I weep for how difficult life will be for women under Clinton's patriarchal Supreme Court appointees.
Luther, hasn't the R leadership already promised an 8 justice court for 4 or 8 years, claiming they would stonewall any nominee suggested by Clinton?
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Post by Iamwhomiam »

backtoiam » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:01 pm wrote:I have seen this posted around the internet but I cannot verify if the video actually was shot in the places indicated. It does appear to be people stuffing ballot boxes but the when and where I am not sure of. I have not seen it grabbing any traction such as people being arrested for it. It is actually comical the way they go about stuffing the boxes.

https://youtu.be/8YsRU0TFQTY


That's cute btia. How do you know it's not really republicans filmed by republicans to frame dems? You don't. The first scene shows someone shredding documents, not stuffing a ballot box. Welcome back.
Post Reply