Johnny Gosch update

sunny · Post by **sunny** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:10 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Me neither. I was denied membership and not provided with a reason for the action. If that board is infiltrated, that mole reads our posts here.<hr></blockquote> et, as in, someone over there reads here and doesn't like our take on the case?

Et in Arcadia ego · Post by **Et in Arcadia ego** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:37 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Et, it's about 24 minutes in, and she's saying "particularly the Omaha World Herald", althought I had to replay it a few times because it did sound like "Patricia Link blah blah blah Roy Harrold". The sound quality is awful.<hr></blockquote> You're right. I decided to capture and scrub the audio and I hear it now. If the time later allows, I'd like to clean the entire audio track for others and share a repaired mp3 via putfile, etc. I might even be able to splice the repaired audio back into the video file itself, not sure yet, cause I've never worked with video before.. ____________________ Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.

Et in Arcadia ego · Post by **Et in Arcadia ego** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:38 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>et, as in, someone over there reads here and doesn't like our take on the case?<hr></blockquote> My opinion is unfortunately yes. ____________________ Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.

stackdag · Post by **stackdag** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:45 am

Latest video/ article <a href="http://www.kcci.com/news/9809822/detail.html">www.kcci.com/news/9809822/detail.html]www.kcci.com/news/9809822/detail.html]www.kcci.com/news/9809822/detail.html</a> I'm dissapointed to see this topic sinking down into the second page. I'm hoping to keep this story alive. I was extremely dissapointed that this huge story, which seemed to be gaining so much momentum, just plain fizzeled out shortly after the Gannon episode. Jeff Gannon, whether he's johnny or not, was the catalyst that helped me first become aware of the gosch/franklin information. Does anyone know what has happened to Alex Merklinger's "mysteries of the mind"? The mp3 files for past episodes on the site are no longer available for download. The only option that currently works is the streaming windows media information. Merklinger's series of interviews with Noreen Gosch, John Decamp, Jim Rothstein, Rusty Nelson, and Ted Gunderson, were some of the best audio files I've ever heard on the subject. It's too bad he's no longer doing the show, especially in light of this new information. 4acloserlook also seemed to be taking the lead on continuing with exposing this case. Even Alex Jones had an interview with John DeCamp/Tom Flocco during spring of 2005, and now it's just silent. The most recent interview I've heard was The French Connection interview with Jim Rothstein which was several months ago, and then a John Decamp interview a few months after that. But that was all before this new break in the case. Is it just because the Gannon/Gosch story was more sensational that it seemed to get more coverage back in 2005? Because this new evidence in the case seems to be much more of a story in terms of verifyable evidence, as opposed to the speculative evidence with Jeff Gannon. Strange that the media's theme on these new photos is the mantra of "authenticity", as opposed to finding out "where" or "who" the pictures came from. They seem authentic enough to me in terms of the time period in which they were taken and the fact that they have young boys tied up in them. Let's never let this story die again, let's take this story to the finish!!! If anyone has any information on new mp3 files, podcasts, or interviews with Noreen Gosch or Jim Rothstein, please post the information here. I'm suprised that nobody from rbnlive or other alternative media show hosts haven't had Jim or Noreen on for interview after this news broke. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nEXDbC5lR4">www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nEXDbC5lR4]www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nEXDbC5lR4]www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nEXDbC5lR4</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCV_78_SVaY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCV_78_SVaY]www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCV_78_SVaY]www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCV_78_SVaY</a> Let's keep the story in the current conciousness with, at least, weekly updates. Also it'd be great if someone kept a collection of all those mp3 interviews (4acloseklook/Merklinger..ect.) on a web sever somewhere for download at anytime. Here's some mp3 interviews I've found doing some advanced searches on google Recent DeCamp: <a href="http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Burley/0608/20060819_Sat_Burley1.mp3">mp3.rbnlive.com/Burley/0608/20060819_Sat_Burley1.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Burley/0608/20060819_Sat_Burley1.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Burley/0608/20060819_Sat_Burley1.mp3</a> Old Rothstein: <a href="http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0505/20050502_Mon_Rick2.mp3">mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0505/20050502_Mon_Rick2.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0505/20050502_Mon_Rick2.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0505/20050502_Mon_Rick2.mp3</a> <a href="http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0511/20051122_Tue_Rick1.mp3">mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0511/20051122_Tue_Rick1.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0511/20051122_Tue_Rick1.mp3]mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick/0511/20051122_Tue_Rick1.mp3</a> Also an interview on what seems to be a somewhat realted case this one: <a href="http://www.red-ice.net/radio/2006/07jul/20060730.html]www.red-ice.net/radio/2006/07jul/20060730.html">www.red-ice.net/radio/2006/07jul/20060730.html]www.red-ice.net/radio/2006/07jul/20060730.html</a> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=stackdag@rigorousintuition>stackdag</A> at: 9/10/06 10:36 am

chiggerbit · Post by **chiggerbit** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:09 pm

I can't believe that no one has come forward yet and identified those other two boys. Surely law enforcement all over the country are showing that one pic to all families of children who went missing around that time. It's a shame the media doesn't do more to help with putting names to those faces.

godzorphan · Post by **godzorphan** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:07 pm

Well, there is the disturbing possibility that they may not even be from the US.

sunny · Post by **sunny** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:11 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Well, there is the disturbing possibility that they may not even be from the US.<hr></blockquote> What makes you think that, godzorphan?

blanc · Post by **blanc** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:56 pm

paedo rings do traffic across frontiers and also target children who are unlikely to be reported missing (as well as kidnapping that is) eg. children from institutions which either do not have good systems to track children who don't return (this was found to be the case in UK in investigations into childrens homes after the West case) children whose sole carer has been 'disappeared' children born into situations which are either designed to produce children for abuse, or where the parent is corrupt children who are sent alone to other countries (again, large numbers of unaccompanied children were found to be arriving in UK- NCS asked for help from immigration services to track them and was told insufficient resources same circs could apply in USA

sunny · Post by **sunny** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:36 pm

REmember the little African American girl who disappeared from the custody of the state of Florida? What was her name? Wonder what happened to her.

godzorphan · Post by **godzorphan** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:44 pm

Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, there is the disturbing possibility that they may not even be from the US. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What makes you think that, godzorphan? See Blanc's response. Trafficking kids across international borders is not unheard of.

stackdag · Post by **stackdag** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:27 pm

Have you guys seen the comments these sickos are making on the youtube videos of the Gosch case? "Jobediah (6 days ago) That seems a wee bit fishy to me. Either she's retarded for letting him go (despite ANYTHING he may have said), or she's lying to get press. The photos are a creepy addition to the story. They obviously need to be authenticated since there should be sufficient doubt surrounding the mother's claims. Blech!" Why is this the instinctual reaction? Is it easier to believe that she faked and lied about the photos than to believe that Johnny was kinapped into a sex ring run by the government? "PC3900 (2 days ago) This case, and poor Noreen Gosch herself, have been hijacked by nutjobs who believe there are satanic-conspiracy-pedophile-cults kidnapping children across the country. The photos were certainly sent to her by believers of this bunk. None of the boys resembles Gosch, and I doubt they depict foul play either. The serious investigation of what happened to Johnny Gosch is damaged by this idiocy - as is the memory of Gosch himself." So what is this guy saying exactly? Conspiracy nuts faked photos to send to Noreen to futher publicize the case? If that's true then why? What would people gain to benefit by putting on a hoax this big? It doesn't make any sense. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=stackdag@rigorousintuition>stackdag</A> at: 9/10/06 7:29 pm

FourthBase · Post by **FourthBase** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:31 pm

Looks like PC3900 = PCarpent/RoyHarrold/RobinGaison/son-of-gaia

godzorphan · Post by **godzorphan** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:46 pm

Funny how the same cast of characters keeps surfacing, as if they have nothing else to do but troll the net for any mention of satanic cults, conspiracy, child trading, etc. They must have a pretty good income to afford to be that committed.

Rigorous Intuition · Post by **Rigorous Intuition** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:01 pm

"I doubt they depict foul play either" wtf?

chiggerbit · Post by **chiggerbit** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:03 pm

Regarding the black and white pic of Johnny alone, I tried saving that to my cheap photo program, then lightening the pic, as I know sometimes some colors shot in black-and-white often end up looking darker than it appears. Hair color is one instance. What I got was something that looked a bit like a black-and-off black leopard pattern. Now, that could have been pixelization(?), or something else in the fabric. But, wasn't there a period quite a number of years ago where leopard-printed fabric was quite popular? Way before camo fashion? Somebody somewhere knows who those other two kids are. Because of Gunderson's involvement in this case, I am keeping all possible theories open. I think that post might have been referring to runaways, RI. The pics always could have been a posed project by a group of kids, aiding and abetting. Still a possibility. Maybe not a probability, but a possibility. Like I said, someone, somewhere will recognize those kids, if it is given enough media exposure. BTW, IF it's more of a run-way situation, and IF I were a profiler (no, I'm not), I would be inclined to think that it involved older teens. If I were inclined to believe that Gosh were a runaway, and put that together with the Washington Times 1989 series on callboys visiting the White House, I would certainly look into whether Gosh was one of the White House callboys. If that were true, his age-progression might give some of the customers heart palpitations. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 9/10/06 8:34 pm

rigorousintuition.ca

Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Other Kids In Photo

Re: Other Kids In Photo

other kids

Re: other kids

Re: Other Kids In Photo

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Re: Johnny Gosch update