Page 3 of 4
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:41 pm
by barracuda
Jeff wrote:Edited the posting guidelines, and broken out the change under a separate topic of "Gender and Sexism." Thanks all for your input. Let me know if you'd like to tweak it, and then I'll post it in General Discussion.
Welcome to the RI board.
While Rigorous Intuition welcomes a range of informed perspectives, it is not intended to be a forum for the re-fighting of elemental human values. It should be assumed that this is a place where the dignity and rights of all people are respected. Members who challenge these rights may be regarded as disruptive, and members who habitually challenge them will be banned.
This is an anti-fascist board. Propagation of fascist, neo-Nazi and "white pride" causes, including sympathetically linking to sites which advocate such, will not be permitted. This includes revisionist histories of the Holocaust.
This is an anti-sexist board. We correctly assume that women, as a group, have been and continue to be the object of oppression based upon their gender. It is expected that members will respect the rights of women to justice and equality in all spheres of life, and to a positive experience of RI. Contending that feminism is a "New World Order plot" will not be permitted.
Posts advocating violence, or espousing hatred of a people based upon race, religion, gender or sexuality, are not permitted.
The charge or insinuation of "disinfo agent" can almost never be proven, and poisons and often ends meaningful discussion. Therefore suggesting a poster is purposefully spreading disinformation is not permitted.
Please refrain from personal attacks, and keep arguments issue-based.
Members can help maintain the health of the board. If you see something that you think needs attention, please pm myself or a moderator with the link, or use the alert button.
Thank you for your civil and thoughtful contributions, and your cooperation in helping to generate more light than heat.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... =36&t=8705
Okay, I can schwing with this. Maybe send a notice to Willow as a courtesy? Can't wait to see the shitstorm it fires up in General Discussion!!
Yay!! Shitstorm!!
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:46 pm
by Jeff
Right, I'm on it. And I'll bring the broom and dustbin.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:48 pm
by Jeff
Willow gave it a thumbs up, so I'm happy with it.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:31 pm
by barracuda
One hundred and thirty views and not a single comment. What does that mean??
And also: does the new rule mean I don't have to address Stephen's latest post? Because it looks like an exhausting task.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:50 am
by Canadian_watcher
This is an anti-sexist board. We correctly assume that women, as a group, have been and continue to be the object of oppression based upon their gender. It is expected that members will respect the rights of women to justice and equality in all spheres of life, and to a positive experience of RI. Contending that feminism is a "New World Order plot" will not be permitted
I think this is perfect. I like that you begin by stating "we correctly assume." that's pretty powerful.
Still laying a bit low for today, but I have my strength back. Thanks for your support Jeff, Barracuda. Now I must paint for many hours or starve later.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:52 am
by Jeff
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:39 am
by Jeff
Received a pm from Stephen informing me he's leaving the board, as short of "a severe head injury accompanied by massive personality changes" he "can't blithely acquiesce in the promotion of what I consider to be blatant untruth to the position of unquestionable holy writ." I replied that I was sorry to hear that, as he's been an intelligent contributor not without charm, and if he could ever see a way to respect the guidelines, short of self-inflicted head injury, he's welcome to return.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:50 am
by Canadian_watcher
It's too bad - when he's not defending an indefensible position wrt to women's rights he is charming and smart and insightful and funny. On the other hand of course, if he truly isn't willing to put down that animosity it's best if he does leave. I wish he could have seen that he could make his points about men's rights in a more constructive way.
btw.. HOLY WRIT?
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:09 pm
by Peregrine
Um, am I imagining things? Did Steven just do an about face on the misogyny thread?
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:06 pm
by barracuda
If I'm not mistaken, he's trying on a new pair of irony.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 4:25 pm
by barracuda
I don't know if you've seen this, but I thought you might find it interesting...
http://www.youtube.com/user/grauniad2li ... fiDZ5JDeSc
...in case you ever entertained the notion that he wasn't a real person. He looks EXACTLY as I imagined he would, a young, blond Hagrid.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 4:58 pm
by Jeff
Funny, I'd been picturing Dirk Bogarde.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:32 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
One sentence that derailed a thread:
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/ ... 72#p453872
Is that warning or suspension material? It's undeniably
dickish, but slad's reaction is just as much of a problem. Curious what the consensus is. SM certainly wasn't contributing to the thread.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:01 pm
by barracuda
Send a note home to be signed by his parents and returned.
Re: Stephen Morgan
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:22 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
Wow, Stephen had a LOT of shit to unload on me via PM. Hopefully he feels better, I sure don't care either way. He definitely remembers every slight, though.
