P-Tech: The Wizard Behind the 9/11 Curtain.

[n0x23]

Here's an mp3 with James Corbett interviewing Mark aka. Anti_Illuminati (8/28/2009), articulating the "inside" part of 9/11 was an inside job, mantra.

http://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/2009-0 ... minati.mp3

All input and comments are welcome.

[8bitagent]

I've skyped chatted with that guy, he definitely knows a lot about technology and software infrastructure regarding Ptech/Goagile.

However, as much as there's this rabbit hole of backdoor risk management shenanigans revolving around that world...
I like to bring up how shocking it is that more is not made of Ptech in the mainstream...just from the fact you have a company financed and headed by bin Laden financiers that has its tentacles buried deep into all the top US government agency computer systems as of 9/11/2001.

That, and the fact that al Qaeda's American branch called "Al Kifah" had its name change to Care Intl and got absorbed right after the WTC 1993 attacks into the Ptech circle of businesses
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article ... _in_Boston
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articl ... militants/
complete history of Ptech
http://www.historycommons.org/context.j ... 94ptechbmi

This shows a direct lineage from MAK-al Qaeda to Al Kifah to WTC 1993
to Ptech. All of the financiers of ptech have been shown to be direct terror financiers. Another mainstream article showing all the Saudis behind Ptech involved in financing bin Laden's al Qaeda and other terrorist activity
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-7763215.html

But when it comes to the direct link and possible role of Ptech with 9/11, as well as its true technology capabilities and the government agencies it was wrapped up in...I point to these mindblowing articles

1. Ptech and the Cyber 9/11
http://911blogger.com/node/20677

2. Ptech, 9/11 and US-Saudi Terror
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/w ... _pt1.shtml
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/w ... _pt2.shtml

I also would say the story of Aafia Siddiqui, and how Saudi Arabia directly
financed the Al Kifah/Care organization with her as the head ties into Ptech directly.
http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/72381 ... n/?rel=inf
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/27/nyreg ... .html?_r=1




Follow the rabbit hole!

[seemslikeadream]

Here's an mp3 with James Corbett interviewing Mark aka. Anti_Illuminati (8/28/2009), articulating the "inside" part of 9/11 was an inside job, mantra.

http://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/2009-0 ... minati.mp3

All input and comments are welcome.

This is not in order but I'll get back and try and straighten it out

[pepsified thinker]

thanks slad--I love a good document dump!

[8bitagent]

Thanks to Searcher for posting this in another thread:

http://boston.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/press ... 071509.htm

Basically, the FBI has decided to go after the heads of Ptech and single out how al Qaeda financier and Saudi billionare Yasin al Kadi had for over a decade held a majority financial control of Ptech through subsidiaries and front holding companies.

[compared2what?]

Well. It's always nice to see littlegreenfootballs and a magazine owned by the Reverend Sun-Myung Moon bathing an RI thread with the pure beams of illumination for which they're so rightfully held in high esteem.

But 8bit, you should really take a very serious second look at the state's case against Muntasser. Because they didn't have one. It'd almost be enough to make a person think our government was capable of prosecuting patsies just to rack up a political victory, if we didn't all already know they'd never do that.

[Fred Astaire]

Journalist Danny Casolaro was suicided for trying to break this story open. Writing for the Little Rock Gazette, he was in the belly of the beast at that time. I believe the word was "Arkancide".

[Searcher08]

I think researching Promis is like advertising.

50% is effective and 50% is not, but you never know which is which.

c2w, I take your point, but in this case would say O'Meara's article is excellent and very much worth addressing.

I think the political factors can work both ways and simultaneously so that in most cases of terrorism charges, there are probably some of these dynamics going on:

Innocent Muslims who the Government is trying to free
Innocent Muslims who the Government is trying to convict / frame
Guilty Islamists who the Government is trying to convict
Guilt Islamists who the Government is trying to free

I am convinced that in most of these cases we see the visible tip of an iceberg of conflicting political influences.

[seemslikeadream]

Well. It's always nice to see littlegreenfootballs and a magazine owned by the Reverend Sun-Myung Moon bathing an RI thread with the pure beams of illumination for which they're so rightfully held in high esteem.

But 8bit, you should really take a very serious second look at the state's case against Muntasser. Because they didn't have one. It'd almost be enough to make a person think our government was capable of prosecuting patsies just to rack up a political victory, if we didn't all already know they'd never do that.

stop, info is info, from where ever it comes, I hold the belief that reading everything is the key to understanding everything, don't dismiss information of any kind, it is THE way to the truth. I took this kinda shit in the DU dungeon I believe RI is much more open to THE idea that we should avail ourselves to all and not to ignore any facts.

unless I mis understood your critizism?

did you even read the article?

[seemslikeadream]

I think researching Promis is like advertising.

50% is effective and 50% is not, but you never know which is which.

Unless one reads everything available on the subject one will never come close to the truth.

[Nordic]

I just can't put my finger on it, but this whole "ptech had something to do with 9/11" thing just doesn't pass the smell test for me.

It feels like a big diversion, a red herring, a wild goose chase.

I could be 100% wrong, it's just my intuition telling me this.

[Searcher08]

I think researching Promis is like advertising.

50% is effective and 50% is not, but you never know which is which.

Unless one reads everything available on the subject one will never come close to the truth.

Not sure what you mean - how would a person know if they had read everything available about it?

I have read enough about it to realise it goes into very very dark territory, in the direction of human biowarfare experimentation.
I guess I just don't want to go there as people seem to have a limited life expectancy when they do.

[seemslikeadream]

I think researching Promis is like advertising.

50% is effective and 50% is not, but you never know which is which.

Unless one reads everything available on the subject one will never come close to the truth.

Not sure what you mean - how would a person know if they had read everything available about it?

I have read enough about it to realise it goes into very very dark territory, in the direction of human biowarfare experimentation.
I guess I just don't want to go there as people seem to have a limited life expectancy when they do.

sorry that snarky comment was not directed at you, please except my apologies, I was just coming off the post by cw2 and hadn't come down off my high horse yet

[seemslikeadream]

I just can't put my finger on it, but this whole "ptech had something to do with 9/11" thing just doesn't pass the smell test for me.

It feels like a big diversion, a red herring, a wild goose chase.

I could be 100% wrong, it's just my intuition telling me this.

PTECH might not have anything to do with 9/11 but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be looked at.

[Searcher08]

Hehehe I like that pic. No worries slad- I myself have not only a high horse, but a very low horse too.