What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
spambot: no
Location: Vermontistan

What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Wombaticus Rex »

Source: http://technoccult.net/archives/2010/12 ... k-in-1984/

BEAR IN MIND THIS QUESTION IS BASED ON GOOGLE RESULTS AND THERE'S A LOT OF REASONS WHY THIS "INFORMATION" MIGHT JUST BE AN ANOMALY but assuming it's not...
Google’s new NGram viewer gives a fascinating look at how memes ebb and flow throughout the years by sharting the appearance of certain words within all the books indexed by Google Books. So far, you can search between 1800 and 2008.

http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/

Here’s one that’s really interesting. Looking at the history of the word “magick,” there’s an explosion of interest beginning in the 1980s:

Image

A closer look reveals that the bump that starts an upward trend occurs between 1984 and 1985:

Image

A few notes:

Michelle Remembers (the book that helped start the Satanic Panic) was released in 1980 and Falcon Publishing started around that year.

Some of Llewellyn‘s biggest hits like Wicca and Modern Magick didn’t come out in the late 80s, but the publishing house has been around since the 1901 (founded in Portland, incidentally). According to Wikipedia, the company started publishing authors like Dion Fortune and Aleister Crowley in the 60s. The other big publisher of occult and new age books, Weiser, was founded in 1956 – also well before the 80s explosion.

McMartin preschool trial started in 1983 and through the 1987. This probably contributed significantly to number of books published on magick and the occult during this period.
My comment:
My guess would be the US military. When the MKNAOMI/Bluebird work got extended, post Church Committee, it was usually carried on through cults and UFO groups. They’re culturally marginalized and ideal cover for covert operations — this is nothing new and dates back at least as far as Napoleon’s chief of secret police, Joseph Fouche.

There have been two excellent books covering the UFO aspect, “Project Beta” and more recently (and comprehensively) the book “Mirage Men.” The cult aspect clearly has a “Third Rail” to it because nobody’s touched it but idiots so far, which is a pity, because the glimpses we do have, like The Finders material, is fascinating and disturbing stuff.

There’s no need for direct collusion: it’s not like some obscure psyops (or LIC) division needed to have a case officer feeding people information and cutting checks. The Satanic Panic could just as easily have been an organic phenomenon — and most likely was.

I am grateful that enough information about military (especially Air Force) disinformation has come to light in order to make books like “Mirage Men” possible, but I think the MK work being done in cults was a whole separate order of magnitude away from forging documents and UFO photos. Pranking UFOlogists is one thing, deliberate physical and mental child abuse is quite another – BLUEBIRD was not a disinformation campaign but hands-on testing upon human subjects.

OR…it’s entirely because Kee MacFarlane’s testimony before congress that year about the McMartin episode in 1983 gave everyone some easy sensational copy. Then again that wasn’t until September…so perhaps the McMartin headlines were more than enough.

In closing, I’d like to point out to curious researchers that the bio of Lawrence Pazder, author and ringleader of the original “Michelle Remembers” book, reads like a guided tour of ongoing MK programs. Writing an absurd book about Satanic Ritual Abuse is arguably the least interesting thing about him in this light.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
spambot: no
Location: Vermontistan

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Wombaticus Rex »

Looking over my comment an hour later, I think I failed to execute. I don't discount the fact that the "Satanic Panic" was an actual Panic, that hundreds of reports were false, that allegations were used around the country for deceptive political ends, and that media coverage clearly fed it's own fire.

What I wanted to get across, though, was the reality underneath the panic. I'm clearly not versed enough in the history to do that, and it's sure as shit not for lack of reading -- thousands and thousands of pages of reading that left me almost precisely as confused and ill informed as I was 10 years ago before I had any interest in this subject (beyond "Those Wacky Fucking Christians...")

(Side note: I was very disappointed in Nick Bryant's book. Why he patterned his whole investigation on DeCamp's book is beyond me, but it was Death for his entire project. I didn't want to get involved in the discussion/unpacking here because there was good work being done and I had nothing positive to say. Which actually shuts me up far more often than you'd probably think.)

Onwards:

link to google search covering Jan 1984 - Dec 1985

Magick Without Tears (not the first edition, obviously)

Practical color magick by Raymond Buckland (Llewyn)

Most interesting, to me: The future of religion: secularization, revival, and cult formation by...my two favorite technocrat weirdo sociologists, William Sims Bainbridge and Rodney Stark (no relation to Roland).

Also -- was Illuminatus! first published as a collected trilogy in 1984?
User avatar
eyeno
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
spambot: no

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by eyeno »

Totally fascinating to the max wombat. I had no idea google could do this. I have seen you guys produce a couple of fascinating data mining capabilities in this forum that I never knew existed. If nobody cares I would like to start a thread on the data mining capabilities of google's tricks and let you guys show me some of google's capabilities that I don't know exists. I got into a habit of staying away from google because of all the corporate trashy results it brings back. I haven't bothered to dig into the bowels of google and didn't know a lot of this stuff existed. If I start a thread on it I hope some of you guys will show off your google talents for me so I can see what all you guys know. It would sure save me a lot of time figuring it all out on my own. I had no idea what I was missing. That may sound strange for a name like eyeno but I got to where I hated google and stayed away from it.

I know this is a bit off topic but I wanted to give early heads up so you guys can be thinking of the things you know about google so you can show me if you will.

Actually we could call the thread "random interesting google data mining thread" to make it more fun.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
spambot: no
Location: Vermontistan

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Wombaticus Rex »

eyeno wrote: I got into a habit of staying away from google because of all the corporate trashy results it brings back.
They've recently introduced a Reading Level feature for that. I keep my filter set to "Intermediate" and it does an amazingly good job of cleaning out spam, product pages, and motherfucking morons. Alas, erudite and intelligent fools still dominate my results, but then again, what other company do I deserve, right?

http://www.seroundtable.com/google-read ... 12625.html

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:ski ... f&tbs=rl:1
User avatar
tazmic
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by tazmic »

OMG!

Image
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
nathan28
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by nathan28 »

If you ask me that ngram graph resembles the stock markets.


But I'm not clear on the OP post message, exactly, especially the timeline. Are you suggesting that "Magick" was a sort of co-traveler with RA?

for reference: RI 'coincidence theorist' thread on MC/RA

Between 1984 and 1987 there were allegations of abuse (not exclusive to RA) at about ten percent of Army daycare centers.
Aquino and Presidio came up in 1987.
Courage To Heal, the book some (can't recall ATM) have suggested largely catapulted recovered memory into the popular conception (I have not read it, just that it's accepted by more than a few that Courage to Heal was significant in popularizing the idea) came out in 1988. It's my understanding it doesn't really cover RA abuse but was siezed on.
I've got a study on a computer at home that did a content-style analysis of the RA-FMS controversy and IIRC the article's author noted that it was only really 'big' in the press for three years at the most, 1988-1991 IIRC. Got to look at that though.

Here IIRC sw or jm posted something to the extent that the original McMartin case was looking at a 'vanilla' pattern of abuse, and it was later steered towards SRA. That might give some credence to the idea that "magick" became popular Mirage-Men style as a sort of KWH-distraction.
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
spambot: no
Location: Vermontistan

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Wombaticus Rex »

nathan28 wrote:If you ask me that ngram graph resembles the stock markets.
Really? A line graph resembles a line graph? I'm glad I didn't ask you, LOL!!
User avatar
semper occultus
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by semper occultus »

chaos magic(k) emerged around that time - Peter Carroll etc - may have flipped the needle on the dial to some extent...
User avatar
Twyla LaSarc
Posts: 1040
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:50 pm
spambot: no
Location: On the 8th hole

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Twyla LaSarc »

I would agree that part of it would have to do with the emergence of a slightly more above ground prescence for occult publishers both old and new. I certainly remember occult books exploding from a single shelf of Sybil Leek and Hans Holtzer in Waldenbooks to entire stores and sections of stores devoted to the topic. The usage of Crowleys magic-k with a k is very interesting, I suppose that could well be due to New Falcon press's Crowleana and the contributions of Carroll, Hines, etc.

As much as it pains me to say, for good or ill, it would also date to the popularization of new age thought in the mid-eighties. I remember a very uncomfortable evening sitting around with some friends while they watched "Out on a Limb" and cooed about how wonderful it was that such truths were being revealed. As you all know, I have no trouble with revealing truths, but I found her stuff to be eye-rollingly hokey. However, the popularity of that show and the following hoo-hah probably did bring a number of people out of the 'broom closet' and turn others on to the subject.

edit to add: I am grateful for the bounties of the internet. For those who enjoy the occasional esoteric text and/or commentary may I reccommend Grimoar.cz:
http://english.grimoar.cz/?Loc=idx&Lng=2

All the esoteric texts you can eat and many don't even have that overused k-word in their titles! :wink

On further edit: Llewellen published the first single volume edition of "The Golden Dawn" in 1986. Whether this was responsible for part of the trend or in response to it, it is hard to say.
Last edited by Twyla LaSarc on Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“The Radium Water Worked Fine until His Jaw Came Off”
American Dream
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by American Dream »

.


What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?


Image



Image
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Stephen Morgan »

nathan28 wrote:But I'm not clear on the OP post message, exactly, especially the timeline. Are you suggesting that "Magick" was a sort of co-traveler with RA?
Image
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
TheDuke
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:11 am

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by TheDuke »

Nifty tool but definitely some problems with dates.
User avatar
justdrew
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
spambot: no
Location: unknown
Contact:

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by justdrew »

I blame Reagen. :mad2

:P

no, it probably had more to do with an increase in the rate of book publishing, and the word garnered some cache and was likely used to "differentiate" product on crowded Fantasy and new age book shelves.

Also since it fell out of use by the early 1700s I think and it's revival in the early 1900s, it just took time to incubate and percolate through the culture.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
norton ash
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by norton ash »

Motley Crue, Satanic Panic, and a couple of movies? I dunno.
Zen horse
Joe Hillshoist
Posts: 10626
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm

Re: What Made "Magick" so Popular in 1984?

Post by Joe Hillshoist »

I blame Neil Megson....
Post Reply