eyeno wrote:Dutchsinse believes that radar installations at airports, and other places, are equipped with technology that follows the HAARP model. He looks for certain types of rings and squares in the radar signature. He believes that when the free television market went all digital that the antenna system once used for free television was converted to a HAARP type usage, and or, usage for government use of other types. This seems to make sense considering that it is doubtful the antenna systems were changed for the sole benefit of the public and that the desire of government use would outweigh the public good.
I have been following his theory and at this point, unless it becomes otherwise, he seems to be fairly accurate in his forecasts. His general theory is that there will be rough weather following these patterns due to heating of the ionosphere.
Having studied HAARP lately it appears as if HAARP can heat the ionosphere enough to manipulate weather. There are official documents that indicate this is true.
HAARP has many capabilities and I suspect that affecting the weather is not always the intention of its use but is a byproduct of its use. It can be used for Tomography to analyze the contents of minerals deep into the surface of the earth. Manipulating the weather of course has obvious benefits though. There may be some weather manipulation going on in my opinion in an effort to steer some of this Fukushima radiation away from certain locations.
From what I have read HAARP may be able to vibrate or possibly heat oil, natural gas, etc...below the surface of the earth to make it easier to extract from the earth for human use. If true I find it conceivable that this could cause earthquake activity and weather storms.
My take on this at the present time is that these storms are not being created for "disaster capitalism" uses because the storms are not destroying enough property to make is useful for such an activity, and that 'if' these storms are a by product of HAARP it 'may' have something to do with natural gas or oil deposits in the New Madrid fault zone.
Who knows, there may also be some playing into the 2012 end of times scenario.
And then of course I could be completely wrong.
I started a thread on this a few weeks ago, but it fits here, so...
Bruce Dazzling wrote:This is from the January 14, 1999 European Parliament Report on the environment, security and foreign policy.HAARP - a weapons system which disrupts the climate
On 5 February 1998 Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(22) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(23) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial 'lenses'.
HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.
The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one's own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.
From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(24) to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth's magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.
Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.
With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.
HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have. We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.
A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) casts considerable doubt on HAARP on legal as well as humanitarian and political grounds. The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.(25) This would mean that HAARP is a breach of international law. All the implications of the new weapons systems should be examined by independent international bodies. Further international agreements should be sought to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in war.
