Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
On 10 October I received the following e-mail from an American academic based on the West Coast, who would probably rather remain unidentified "I am obsessed with bin Laden's accoutrements. He is such an amazingly elegant man. He is always incredibly beautiful to look at. I think this is somehow the source of his appeal. He comes across as a dandy, very aesthetically thin, and he always looks so much better than the ragged chunky thugs who surround him... Laden is lit up with idealism, and freaky aesthetic ideas. I find this very curious: somehow he sees all this as art - even the wonderful staging of the planes was sublime ...somehow I think the key to his personality is his remarkable and utterly obvious interest in presenting himself as delicate and beautiful... He clearly wants to be seen as a person of taste and breeding. Even in combat fatigues he always looks just great..."
On a less ethereal note, Darius James e-mailed me on 16 September saying: "I've been reading your critical essays in preparation for a piece I'm writing about Chicks On Speed. I hadn't read them before. The piece will go in NY Press. They are interesting in light of current events. Your strategies seem most suited to Bush's war against his invisible enemies. Osama bin Laden could be the new Luther Blissett."As I have made clear, terrorism is vanguardist and tends to derail progressive political struggles, but what James says is interesting, since if an anonymous network of magico-Marxists in "the West" adopted Osama bin Laden as a signature for divers prank activities, it might do something to undermine the symmetrically "opposed" positions of both the Holy Alliance and al-Qaida in their singularly monolithic struggle against "evil". Having become a global celebrity, bin Laden is all things to all people, and so it would be easy enough to "hijack" this digital phantom and dress "her" in the clothes of transsexual anti-matter that bends light. A Groucho-Marxist pantomime might impel people to stare into the black pit of this implosion of meaning.
Bain’s book is Trineday’s latest declaration of independence from the mass hypnosis that has been directed at suffering humanity for so many years.
Like the murder of JFK, the “events of 9/11” were a gigantic hammer-blow to the American psyche, but the fallout from the second tragedy has also had immediate and catastrophic global consequences, and this was no accident.
In the confusing swamp of lies, half-truths, contradictions and wild speculation surrounding 9/11, it is our natural inclination to throw up our hands and close our eyes to an evil we simply do not want to believe in. For those who have the stomach for unflinching inquiry, The Most Dangerous Book in the World will take you deeper into this historical rabbit-hole than you ever thought you could go.
Maintaining a humorously cocked eye, Bain meticulously lays out an “occult script” for a satanic “mega-ritual” that was planned for decades, using age-old tools of mass mind control by terror, fine-tuned for the New World Order. Far from a fundamentalist conspiracy rant, the scenario is firmly grounded in serious knowledge of arcane practices, and the people, buildings and airplanes involved in 9/11, revealing a compelling tapestry of dark design scarier than anything Lord Sauron himself might have concocted – except it’s real. As the overlapping of dates, flight numbers, symbols, architecture, and personalities multiply, it becomes ever harder to shrug the evidence off as mere coincidence.
One need not believe in the existence of Satan and his evil minions to accept that ritual “magic” has been used to frighten and manipulate large groups of people many times for many purposes, including political and financial dominion. It is not even necessary that those who use these “powers” actually believe in the demons they symbolically unleash. The effect is what counts, and, as S.K. Bain shows us, it works like a charm.
8bitagent wrote:Osama bin Laden could be the new Luther Blissett.
happenstance wrote:IanEye wrote:1111
Whoa, why the posting of the latest Never Not Funny episode, may I ask? Besides the numeric similarity?
IanEye wrote:happenstance wrote:IanEye wrote:1111
Whoa, why the posting of the latest Never Not Funny episode, may I ask? Besides the numeric similarity?
just a nice bit of synchronicity.
i was listening to this latest episode (1111) of NNF yesterday while cleaning around the house, and Mister Pardo makes note of the episode number by saying, "eleven eleven, one one one one, eleven eleven, only two away from 'never fogetting'..."
a 9/11 reference.
then, when i was finished cleaning i logged on to RI to see 8bit had posted this 11 after 11 thread, which i thought was funny.
But then, when is 8bit ever not funny?
wait, this song is sort of depressing, here is a better 1 :
man, now my head is a jumble of numbers and months...
Ah! has any 1 mentioned the 11/12/01 thing where a plane fell out of the sky on Veterans Day yet?
that will get things back to:
*
happenstance wrote:
Yeah, you might say that show has an odd fixation with 9/11 jokes. But it's always about the "never forget" directive and never about people's suffering. He loves to play with numbers 7 dates and make weird associations with 9/11.
thurnundtaxis wrote:8-bit, you might be interested in this volume coming next week from Trineday:
[b]The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual[/b
by S.K. Bain foreword by Peter Levenda]Bain’s book is Trineday’s latest declaration of independence from the mass hypnosis that has been directed at suffering humanity for so many years.
Like the murder of JFK, the “events of 9/11” were a gigantic hammer-blow to the American psyche, but the fallout from the second tragedy has also had immediate and catastrophic global consequences, and this was no accident.
In the confusing swamp of lies, half-truths, contradictions and wild speculation surrounding 9/11, it is our natural inclination to throw up our hands and close our eyes to an evil we simply do not want to believe in. For those who have the stomach for unflinching inquiry, The Most Dangerous Book in the World will take you deeper into this historical rabbit-hole than you ever thought you could go.
Maintaining a humorously cocked eye, Bain meticulously lays out an “occult script” for a satanic “mega-ritual” that was planned for decades, using age-old tools of mass mind control by terror, fine-tuned for the New World Order. Far from a fundamentalist conspiracy rant, the scenario is firmly grounded in serious knowledge of arcane practices, and the people, buildings and airplanes involved in 9/11, revealing a compelling tapestry of dark design scarier than anything Lord Sauron himself might have concocted – except it’s real. As the overlapping of dates, flight numbers, symbols, architecture, and personalities multiply, it becomes ever harder to shrug the evidence off as mere coincidence.
One need not believe in the existence of Satan and his evil minions to accept that ritual “magic” has been used to frighten and manipulate large groups of people many times for many purposes, including political and financial dominion. It is not even necessary that those who use these “powers” actually believe in the demons they symbolically unleash. The effect is what counts, and, as S.K. Bain shows us, it works like a charm.
http://www.trineday.com/paypal_store/pr ... index.html
S.K. Bain is the former art director of The Weekly Standard magazine, where he worked with
William Kristol, Fred Barnes, David Brooks, Tucker Carlson and others for over five years.
During part of that time, the Project for the New American Century shared offices with the
publication, and next door was the Philanthropy Roundtable, where Bain art directed for
Philanthropy magazine. The Roundtable at that point was under the leadership of John P.
Walters, who went on to become President George W. Bush’s Drug Czar.
In the mid-nineties, Bain was art director for the Oxford American magazine when it
was published by John Grisham and located in Oxford, MS. In 2009, Bain helped author
portions of U.S. Public Law 111-11, which designated three new wilderness areas.
Was the US government manipulated or "hijacked" by extremely sophisticated and powerful international actors? What if the above were true, but this wasn't even the half of it? What if the truth were even more disturbing?
8bitagent wrote:1. The co-pilot of the downed Wellstone plane had hung around alleged "20th hijacker" Zacharius Moussoui in Oklahoma, even giving Moussoui software found on his laptop
5. And while Heaven's Gate got kicked off with a call in by former protoge of an FBI/remote viewer, the top "Men Who Stare At Goats" guy Bert Rodriguez(played by Clooney in the film adaptation) trained 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah in 2001
By Paul Thompson
...
Ziad Jarrah is one of the best known of the 19 9/11 hijackers. What most people don’t know, however, is that there were actually two Ziad Jarrahs: the one raised in Lebanon and whose picture has been widely circulated by the FBI, and the one who actually flew on Flight 93. The evidence of two is undeniable, and amazingly, we even have pictures of the second Jarrah.
8bitagent wrote:8. One of the STRANGEST of all 9/11 facts: The avant garde performance art team "B Thing" who snuck into a higher floor room in the World Trade Center had a member that a year later was living with the very Israeli agents living next door to some of the hijackers. Another B Thing member lived near Hamas fundraising front Infocom in Dallas
I mean if 9/11 is suppose to be an "inside job", why would it be shot down?
IanEye wrote:happenstance wrote:
Yeah, you might say that show has an odd fixation with 9/11 jokes. But it's always about the "never forget" directive and never about people's suffering. He loves to play with numbers 7 dates and make weird associations with 9/11.
yes, well i am sure 8bit would rather talk about highjackings in this thread than his thread being highjacked, so i will refer further talk of podcasts to here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests