Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Forgetting2 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:52 pm wrote:justdrew » 26 Jun 2013 18:38 wrote:well if he was ordering and getting NA beer while his 'critics' he invited out get the real stuff, that would be a good way to learn things, and it's not so hard to seem drunk to a drunk you've been drinking with. So, could have been a handy trick.
Could be. But the one article with the guy he's just met clearly says, 'Hastings and I got pretty drunk that night.' It sticks out as an unnecessary throwaway to the story, unlike say, "after getting drunk, Hastings loosened up and gave up his real feelings about..." The revelation that is in there isn't anything you wouldn't expect from Hastings.
Karmamatterz » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:49 pm wrote:Anybody who seriously understands computers and networks will tell you nothing is safe from being hacked. Somethings are harder to get into than other, cars are not on the extremely difficult list, they are niche targets with little payoff. Avi gets into the discussion about hacking automobiles about 5:00 into the clip.
http://www.ted.com/talks/avi_rubin_all_ ... acked.html
This might already be posted in this thread, not sure, not a lot of time to read every post.
http://www.autosec.org/pubs/cars-usenixsec2011.pdf
Hasting's Mercedes could easily have been hacked by someone with a few tools and no worries of being caught. I'm sure the LAPD was told not to , or is too stupid or lazy to know how to look for the right logs that would identify access into systems. Unless you wipe the log, which any really clever person would do, there is possibly a record timestamped somewhere if his car was hacked. This would also highly depend on methods of access.
Alchemy » 26 Jun 2013 19:39 wrote:If you are referring to my forced prose that is ok, I wont rip anything new for it, I welcome any criticism of my beliefs in fact, by all means I think I understand where you are coming from, maybe not, always hard to tell on these forums without the benefit of body language and other helpful hints, but I ALSO do not like where any of this crap is taking me, it is hurtful and offensive that people might actually be working hard to smear this man's name after his death just to cover up what could be a murder.
jfshade » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:11 pm wrote:So Cenk has gone from counseling us to calm down and let the LAPD sort this all out to being shocked, SHOCKED! that the technology not only exists to cause the sort of out of control fireball crash that ended Michael Hasting's life, but that it's relatively easy to do, and that this incident is - in the words of a former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism - “consistent with a car cyber attack.”
It takes Richard effing Clarke's assertions to make it OK for guys like Cenk to even raise this possibility? Dude, did you happen to notice this video featuring Dr. Kathleen Fisher of Tufts/DARPA that's received heavy linkage on the internet the last two months?
___________________
(bad old embed code originally meant for old windows media player embeds of some sort. now removed from main posting screen.)
here's what was enclosed in old wonky embed tags:
http://youtu.be/3D6jxBDy8k8
___________________
Forgetting2 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:58 pm wrote:Alchemy » 26 Jun 2013 19:39 wrote:If you are referring to my forced prose that is ok, I wont rip anything new for it, I welcome any criticism of my beliefs in fact, by all means I think I understand where you are coming from, maybe not, always hard to tell on these forums without the benefit of body language and other helpful hints, but I ALSO do not like where any of this crap is taking me, it is hurtful and offensive that people might actually be working hard to smear this man's name after his death just to cover up what could be a murder.
Oh no, not at all. I meant the forced prose of the guy who stuck the bit in his article about Hastings and him getting drunk. And when I think about it, if the guy's really a fan of Hastings, then he knows that Hastings is a recovering addict. And willy nilly throwing that out there just after after they guy died?
This whole thing has got me depressed and angry and feeling helpless.
justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:15 pm wrote:it's too bad the thing is focused on batting down "government agents" as the culprit. That should not even be the main focus of suspicion. There are individuals who have motive and likely means.Our own Jason Torchinsky did a thorough debunking of why this is so unlikely, including how modern cars' internal networks aren't normally equipped to receive wireless instructions and how it's absurd to think that mechanical systems can somehow be easily overridden by a remote signal
I long ago stipulated that most likely they would have had to gain access to the car and install a wireless interface to the computer port.
Revenge is the motive, and we already have a threat to "hunt down and kill" on record.
trying to make this about 'da gubamint did it' is a distraction.
but hell, it's not as though we can trust the LAPD to conduct and investigation worth a damn.
Forgetting2 » 26 Jun 2013 19:52 wrote:justdrew » 26 Jun 2013 18:38 wrote:well if he was ordering and getting NA beer while his 'critics' he invited out get the real stuff, that would be a good way to learn things, and it's not so hard to seem drunk to a drunk you've been drinking with. So, could have been a handy trick.
Could be. But the one article with the guy he's just met clearly says, 'Hastings and I got pretty drunk that night.' It sticks out as an unnecessary throwaway to the story, unlike say, "after getting drunk, Hastings loosened up and gave up his real feelings about..." The revelation that is in there isn't anything you wouldn't expect from Hastings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 181 guests