by thoughtographer » Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:10 pm
I really can't disagree with any of that. My point was really that people would rather think that Leedskalnin "whistled" or "hummed" the rocks into place, and people like David Hatcher Childress prey on the gullible and fantasy-prone by perpetuating the more fantastical myths by presenting them as facts.<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>That there are lost arts (of whatever sort) for moving unbelievably huge and heavy stones, is not in dispute. Witness the difficulties in trying to successfully move a bluestone from Wales to the Salisbury Plain several years ago, with all our current knowledge of mechanics.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Yeah, that's a good point to raise here. They really didn't try too many options, as I see it. You could spend years just focusing on lubricants alone. No doubt, there is a ton of lost knowledge that we're only starting to uncover. Take <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Trithemius">Johannes Trithemius'</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Steganographia</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, for example. That wasn't cracked (as far as we know) until 1998, by an AT&T Labs employee, no less.<br><br>The myths and fantasies are a good thing, when it comes down to it. They spark people's imaginations like the (good) science ficition of our times does, and serve to attract more people to the subject than would naturally occur without them. The more minds, the better. <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thoughtographer>thoughtographer</A> at: 4/7/06 1:12 pm<br></i>