psynapz wrote:Anybody know how to find Dutch's latest work?
Edit: never mind, still here: http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/
Here's his Youtube page, which is up to date:
http://www.youtube.com/user/dutchsinse
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
psynapz wrote:Anybody know how to find Dutch's latest work?
Edit: never mind, still here: http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/
https://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/472012-stanford-vlfhaarp-papers-disappear-from-the-internet/
4/7/2012 — Stanford VLF/HAARP papers disappeared from the internet
Posted on April 7, 2012
UPDATE monday 4.9.2012 — Go figure… about a week after we are vindicated … they pull the documents from the net.. AND zap the archive going back to 2008!
Lucky for us… we backed it all up !
———————————————–
Here is my original video from last week:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io_X9KlP ... r_embedded
In the Stanford paper .. THEY (the professionals at Stanford / HAARP) call this “geometric modulation”….. specifically, they refer to the types of PULSES emitted and give these pulses NAMES.
The names they use for the ‘shaped pulses’ are : Circle Sweep, Square Wave, and Sawtooth Sweep.
Again for the record, I’ve been calling these RADAR signatures over the past year ‘HAARP rings’ they call them ‘Circle sweeps’…… I’ve been calling them ‘Scalar Squares’ they call them ‘Square Waves’ ……. I’ve been calling them ‘Stairstep Patterns‘ they call them ‘Sawtooth Sweeps’.
Regardless of terminology, the effect we’re describing is the same.. a ‘pulsed pattern’ which heats the area around the pulsing station.
I really can’t figure out WHY they removed all the HAARP stanford VLF documents.. they’ve been up since 2008.
But alas, they are gone this week…. coincidence — right?!
NEW links to the archives are below.
————————————————-
here is the original link: (not working now)
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/publi ... 008-03.pdf
here is the google cache of that link from Stanford:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... l=en&gl=us
here is the wayback machine archive of the Stanford page:
http://web.archive.org/web/201107191536 ... 008-03.pdf
Below is the same .pdf available for download from my dutchsinse site — download it and share / backup.
http://sincedutch.files.wordpress.com/2 ... 008-03.pdf
Again, for the record, for the skeptics who said I was lying or how did they so bluntly put it.. they falsely accused me of FRAUD!!! Saying I was MAKING THIS ALL UP !
What an EPIC FAIL on their part, and what a difference a year makes!!
Turns out these are what the PROFESSIONALS from Stanford call these same HAARP signatures …. Square Wave, Sawtooth Sweeps, and Circle Sweeps.
If you haven’t put it together yet… Scalar Squares = Square Wave, stairstep pattern = sawtooth sweep, and HAARP ring = Circle Sweep.
To read the terms — look at page 2, section 2, subsection 11:
2nd thing to be vindicated was PREPLANNED EARTHQUAKES / Man made events …. the mexico 7.9 magnitude was indeed pre-planned for over a month before hand…. to the DAY, MINUTE, HOUR, exact COUNTRY, exact magnitude …
Here is the full post PROVING this to be the case: http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/03 ... h-20-2012/
And also proved correct on volcanic plumes coming from dormant volcanic spots:
http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/03 ... t-volcano/
Geometric Modulation - Increasing the Power of HAARP?
image source
Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
As tornadoes complete their march through America’s heartland, and earthquakes rattle the planet, questions as to the nature of these events are being raised anew, particularly among those aware of the capabilities of HAARP technology. Indeed, the more one understands about the levels of technological development achieved in the upper reaches of government and elitist corporations, the more one is forced to question what previously could be taken for granted as a natural occurrence.
Nevertheless, the very concept of man-made weather is simply too much for many stuck in mainstream tunnel vision to grasp. Admittedly, those of us not actually involved in the project, as a result of overwhelming secrecy and blatant refusal to divulge any real information on the HAARP system, are left to much speculation.
Some individuals may claim that HAARP is incapable of producing large-scale events. Others, however, find a way to blame virtually every natural disaster on the technology. In the end, the truth likely sits somewhere in between.
Regardless, there are individuals who have done amazing amounts of good research regarding HAARP with very little resources at their disposal. Obviously, these researchers have developed their own terminology and designation for the anomalies surrounding weather and HAARP events.
Specifically, terms like “Scalar Squares,” “HAARP Rings,” and “Stairstep Patterns” have become accepted nomenclature for many who follow the HAARP system and its effects on weather patterns and the environment.
These terms have become highly used in HAARP-related videos on YouTube and, unfortunately, are the subject of much ridicule by those still ignorant of scientific advancements. More often than not, the very concept of using these types of “patterns,” or even the technology itself, is rejected as tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theory.
However, the folks at Sincedutch have produced a paper published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters by researchers working on a grant presented to Stanford University by the Office of Naval Research regarding the efficacy of a new type of ELF/VLF wave generation. This new method of wave generation – using HAARP itself – is called “geometric modulation” due to the use of geometric patterns for wave generation.
As the paper entitled, “Geometric modulation: A more effective method of steerable ELF/VLF wave generation with continuous HF heating of the lower ionosphere,” states, geometric modulation is a “new method of ELF/VLF wave generation, . . . involving the scanning the HF heating beam in a geometric pattern without modulating its power.”
In the second section of the paper designated “Experimental Setup,” the researchers describe the three main types of geometric modulation patterns used which are subsequently labeled:
line-sweep, defined as “where the heating beam scans back and forth along a chosen azimuth, completing a full back and forth scan . . . in one ELF/VLF period;”
sawtooth-sweep, defined as “where the heating beam scans along one chosen azimuth, completing one sweep across the path in one ELF/VLF period and starting back at the initial end;” and
circle-sweep, defined as “where the heated beam follows a circular pattern with some radius. . .”
As Sincedutch points out, these designations closely parallel those being used in the alternative media/research communities. Interestingly enough, the terms provided by the independent researchers were largely gleaned from radar signatures, which might explain why the terms are so similar without one side being privy to the other. The name might be slightly different – i.e. HAARP Rings=Circle Sweep, Scalar Squares=Square Waves, and Stairstep Patterns=Sawtooth Sweeps – but the pattern remains the same.
This demonstrates, among other things, that many independent researchers have been on target for some time, even as the mainstream has attempted to demonize and ridicule them into obscurity.
One other interesting piece of information provided by this paper is the reasoning behind the use of geometric modulation in the first place. According to the researchers,
Furthermore, since amplitudes of ELF/VLF signals generated via modulated HF heating as observed on the ground are roughly proportional to total HF power delivered to the ionosphere [Barr and Stubbe, 1991], with some variations resulting from a saturation mechanism at these power levels [Moore et al., 2006] the 7-11 dB enhancement exceeds the 6dB enhancement that would be expected by simply doubling the power of HAARP.
Translating this information into English simply means that geometric modulation is capable of significantly enhancing the HF power projected into the ionosphere, not merely upping the power of the HAARP station itself.
As the paper states in the “Conclusion,”
Near HAARP, GM is less effective than AM below 2kHz, but more effective above 3 kHz. For long distance observations, GM consistently produces substantially stronger signals than AM for ELF/VLF frequencies above 3 kHZ, by as much as 7-11 dB. In addition, GM can lead to the creation of an unprecedented ELF phased array, capable of directed radiation at different azimuths within the EIW.
Again, this means that geometric modulation, given the right circumstances, can be used to drastically increase the ELF powers of HAARP and such related technology.
The paper cited above was published in 2008. However, projects such as HAARP are not quite as new as many might think. I have said before in many of my articles that if the general public is made aware of any new type of research, then the truth is that the technology they are being introduced to is now obsolete. We can safely assume that HAARP and projects like it are at least 50 years ahead of what many so-called “conspiracy theorists” take them to be, much less the mainstream commentators (where they exist).
After all, keep in mind that the paper cited in this article actually cites a previous study where ELF/VLF wave generation was demonstrated in a HAARP-like experiment of its own . . . That study took place in 1974.
Read other articles by Brandon Turbeville here.
You can help support this information by voting on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comm ... _of_haarp/
Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor's Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of three books, Codex Alimentarius -- The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, and Five Sense Solutions. Turbeville has published over one hundred articles dealing with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville is available for podcast, radio, and TV interviews. Please contact us at activistpost (at) gmail.com.
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/04/geo ... power.html
Aangirfan
Monday, November 11, 2013
PHILIPPINES TYPHOON CAUSED BY US MILITARY WEAPON - REPORT
Dr Michio Kaku, the Weather Channel and CNN have discussed tropical storms caused by microwave beams (pulses).
Reports have emerged that the typhoon which hit the Philippines was caused by a microwave beam.
The microwave beam was observed in the West Pacific and it appears to have created the typhoon.
Reportedly, a U.S. Airforce base is located near the source of the microwave beam.
The U.S. base is reportedly a satellite communications hub.
After the microwave beam emission, satellite images showed a "heavy rotation" begin to develop, eventually becoming a large tropical storm.
Reports say that weather modifications have been done using a microwave pulse.
Did a Microwave Pulse Cause Typhoon Haiyan? Over 10000 Feared Dead in Philippines (VIDEOS) - International Business Times AU
(cont.)1 of 10 comments:
A. Peasant said...
Hurricane andrew, similar. 1992.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=78948
US sends 90 marines from okinawa to help filipinos. I wonder how all the US military personnel stationed on the phillipines made out, presumably they are safe and would be closer.....
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 584257.cms
11:50 PM
eyeno » Thu May 12, 2011 12:48 pm wrote:I know that this phenomena is real because I personally know very sane people that report these effects. They have tinnitus in their ears. They have been to many doctors but the doctors are clueless. Sometimes it gets so bad they report that their brain feels inflamed. They hear sounds that sound like morse code sometimes. Sometimes it sounds like music, a television, people talking, etc..Sometimes they feel disoriented, weak, sick. When they turn their head one way the sound changes or goes away, and when they turn their head back to its original position the sound resumes.
mentalgongfu2 » Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:30 pm wrote:The topic of weather modification and HAARP isn't new to me, and I'm more or less a believer, but Dutchsinse is new to me and I wasn't all that impressed with the above video. Apparently I haven't clicked on this thread before, or at least not recently. That video was unnecessarily and unreasonably long, repeated multiple parts, and advised me to watch 10-20 additional hours of video in order to catch up on just this latest typhoon. I found myself yelling at the screen and fast forwarding several times. At best, the presentation is lacking but the concepts worth consideration. At worst, this guy reminds me of Rush Limbaugh telling new listeners they really need to listen for 3 hours a day for a minimum of 6 months before they are well-versed enough to understand the discussion. If someone who knows more about this guy can convince me my first impression is wrong, I'm all ears.
brainpanhandler » Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:12 pm wrote:StarmanSkye wrote:Its infuriating when ordinarily intelligent people don't use rigorous thinking to test their assumptions but rush to wonky conclusions that support their emotionalistic biases.
SURE there are all kinds of freaky things going on we don't know much about, but keeping the absurd away from the feasable is a necessary task to keep ourselves reasonably on-track w/ discovering what is real.
From what I can tell looking at the various dutch sinse sites/videos he relies heavily on interpreting anomalous radar artifacts as evidence of HAARP activity. So heavily in fact that if we were to deduct his tea leave reading of radar imagery from his dog and pony show there would be nothing left at all.
I also note that I cannot find any instance of dutch attempting to find a conventional explanation for any of the radar anomalies he uses to make his predictions. He doesn't even try, at least as far as I can tell.
Can any of you dutchsinse followers point me to an instance of when he attempts to explain anomalous radar data with a conventional explanation?
For instance:As previously mentioned, radar stations transmit energy within the microwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, with National Weather Service (NWS) sites currently operating at a wavelength of +/- 10 cm. It turns out that the Sun emits energy across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. At sunrise and sunset when the Sun is near the horizon, radar stations are susceptible to picking up and interpreting the microwave energy as precipitation. The sample image was produced at 5:08pm local time (2208Z) and the spike, aligned along the radial of the beam, is clearly oriented in the direction of the setting Sun in mid-November. It doesn't require an expert in radar interpretation to discern the difference between the anomaly and the widespread precipitation on the image from January 13, 2008.
http://www.lakeeriewx.com/CaseStudies/R ... pikes.html
Dutch just interprets these lines as evidence of HAARP activity as far as I can tell and does not even attempt to find a more conventional explanation.
Can those of you who have read Dutch extensively provide me a link to any instance when Dutch thoroughly and systematically attempts to rule out mundane explanations for radar artifacts?
Is Mysterious Hum Heard Around World Caused By Noisy Fish Sex?
The Huffington Post | By Meredith Bennett-Smith
Posted: 10/29/2013 11:29 am EDT
It's been blamed on everything from high-pressure gas lines to low-frequency earth tremors to submarine communications, but so far researchers have been unable to pinpoint the source of a loud, mysterious humming sound that people around the world have reported hearing.
Now science has an answer. Maybe.
Unofficially known as the Hum, the sound is a droning noise that has been heard from Southampton and Leeds in England to Bondi, Australia, and even Seattle, Wash. While people in a few regions have complained about the intermittent humming for decades, residents in other places have only recently reported hearing it. And for some, the din is unbearable.
LISTEN: The Hum heard in Terrace, British Columbia. (Story continues below.)
"It's a kind of torture; sometimes, you just want to scream," Leeds resident Katie Jacques told the BBC. "It's hard to get off to sleep because I hear this throbbing sound in the background."
The humming has also been driving residents of Southampton batty, prompting scientists there to search for a source, which has led to a new theory involving the male Midshipman fish that lets out a distinctive drone when searching for a mate, The Telegraph reported.
LISTEN: The "humming" sounds of male Midshipmen.
Yet despite widespread media coverage, there is scant evidence to back up the hypothesis. The reports appear to be based on comments made last week by Dr. Ben Wilson, a Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS) scientist who said only that it was possible that fish were causing the throbbing sound.
"It's not beyond the realms of possibility," Dr. Wilson said, according to local publication the Daily Echo. "There are certainly 'sonic fish' in the north Atlantic and the approaches to the English Channel."
This theory is not without precedent. Researchers from the University of Washington's Marine Biology program said last year that Midshipmen fish were to blame for Seattle's humming problem. Scientists speculated that the calls of the fish in Washington State could be reverberating off of boat hulls and buildings.
But while researchers in Seattle had studied the possible link between the fish and humming, no such research has yet been conducted in England. A statement released by SAMS on Friday attempted to clarify the quotation:
Ben did suggest to the Daily Echo reporter how he might record the noises (by putting a microphone into a condom, sealing it and dropping into the water), but he hasn’t received an audio file yet. Perhaps someone would like to take up the task. Or perhaps a media organization would fly Ben and his equipment south to listen to the hum in situ. Fish might be then ruled in or out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests