Sounder » Tue Jan 06, 2015 11:40 pm wrote:Living with split psyches makes collaboration and reconciliation quite a challenge. Both ‘sides’ have shortcomings because they (collectively) tend to see one half of reality as being the whole of reality. Still my greater fear is the continuation of this debt based monetary system. With this system the general population has no control over their own lives.
When exposing myself to worldly verbiage, the first thing that will shut me down is advocacy for war and killing. George Soros says the EU needs to pony up and confront the wanna-be Russian Empire. So does AD, but not through cogent argument of his own words, no that would be too much trouble when there is such a wealth of material available.
I’m also not too keen on the use of negative associations to absolve oneself from considering possible substance in the ‘opponents’ arguments or position.
The killing of nuance is offensive.
AD, you talk about nuance with no examples thereof, and that is an empty form and the antithesis of nuance.
I find it very mechanical, one-directional and exceptionalist.
There is actually very little direct dialogue - it is all mediated through Copy Pasta, much of which seems to relate to very old events, and which is generally provided without any form of context or framing.
The one-directionalism in this case means -
"One set of rules for you, another set for me"
a policy which is apparent in relation to Soros shills, which are posted in their multiple dozens without stating why they are perceived as important, what their provenance is, how this viewpoint was arrived at etc and for whom these issues are smoked over, derailed, etc etc.
People and organisations on the AD shit list are connected to each other as much as possible, while AD pointedly ignores actual real world funding / governance connections of his own execrable fascist-friendly sources.
