Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Nordic » Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:16 am wrote:And gosh, we're just so powerless to stop them! These Devils somehow operate in broad daylight in a country where the skies are dominated 100% by the U.S. Air Force. These Totota pickup trucks and their formidable weapons offer an indomitable defense against the world's largest and most powerful armed forces, so of course we are helpless and can only watch as these priceless treasures are destroyed before our very eyes.
Say WUT?
Just how weird is this gonna fucking GET??
AlicetheKurious » Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:55 am wrote:And I've yet to seen any of the "experts" try to explain how and why all these monuments, artifacts and documents were preserved intact for nearly one and a half millenia under Muslim rule, including very turbulent periods, only to be destroyed after their sovereignty was violated by US-led forces.
Destruction of heritage
See also: Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Wahhabism is hostile to any reverence given to historical or religious places of significance for fear that it may give rise to 'shirk' (that is, idolatry). As a consequence, under Saudi rule, Medina has suffered from considerable destruction of its physical heritage including the loss of many buildings over a thousand years old.[42] Critics have described this as "Saudi vandalism" and claim that in Medina and Mecca over the last 50 years 300 historic sites linked to Muhammad, his family or companions have been lost.[43] In Medina, examples of historic sites which have been destroyed include the Salman al-Farsi Mosque, the Raj'at ash-Shams Mosque, the Jannat al-Baqi cemetery, and the house of Muhammed.[44]
solace » Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:15 pm wrote:AlicetheKurious » Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:55 am wrote:And I've yet to seen any of the "experts" try to explain how and why all these monuments, artifacts and documents were preserved intact for nearly one and a half millenia under Muslim rule, including very turbulent periods, only to be destroyed after their sovereignty was violated by US-led forces.
Not like it hasn't happened before.Destruction of heritage
See also: Destruction of early Islamic heritage sites in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Wahhabism is hostile to any reverence given to historical or religious places of significance for fear that it may give rise to 'shirk' (that is, idolatry). As a consequence, under Saudi rule, Medina has suffered from considerable destruction of its physical heritage including the loss of many buildings over a thousand years old.[42] Critics have described this as "Saudi vandalism" and claim that in Medina and Mecca over the last 50 years 300 historic sites linked to Muhammad, his family or companions have been lost.[43] In Medina, examples of historic sites which have been destroyed include the Salman al-Farsi Mosque, the Raj'at ash-Shams Mosque, the Jannat al-Baqi cemetery, and the house of Muhammed.[44]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medina
Yes, Virginia. Some crazy Muslims do bad shit too.
82_28 » Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:19 am wrote:
Just wait until the christians get radicalized by a bunch of middle eastern upstarts and the absolute destruction they will bring to our holy places.
Just echoing Alice and Nordic showing the absolute absurdity of this destruction campaign. Honestly, I cannot get a clear angle on this as far as from where this is coming from and for what purpose. I tend to look at shit with a mean lean to the esoteric/occult/technofascist reason of intent -- thus complicating things greatly as far as understanding what truly is behind all this.
I remember Nordic brought up the whole KONY thing awhile back and all sorts of kids bought into it I guess. It seems as though KONY whatever the fuck it was went nowhere. But maybe it was a "stress test" on social media to see just how stupid will people get in order to fall into line as far as the "global narrative" of perpetual war???
Obviously I have no idea, but I do know that anyone of conscience and kindness is getting fucked with on all sides -- not just with ISIS. Why is it also so tempting to these "western youth" and christian ex-soldiers via only media? I dunno, but we're definitely getting fucked with. It's as if all the rules of heretofore death and destruction has gone so meta, that it will always be impossible to piece back together.
There's something there though that was expertly made to be missed. I don't like missing what the point of evil fuckers doing what they do at all.![]()
It's NOT That hard to understand if you do some research on the thing. Extremist Salafis are doing what their version of Islam and Allah's will are telling them must be done:destroy idolatry and destroy opposing sects/Shiites. That simple. They've done it before. I don't get what the fucking mystery is all about. And oh yeah, they now have the power and blood lusting drugged up disaffected youth looking for some excitement/real life video massacres to help them. Easy as pie.
And, oh yeah, if the thugs can pick up some loot to fund it all, all the better.
82_28 » Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:13 pm wrote:Solace wrote:It's NOT That hard to understand if you do some research on the thing. Extremist Salafis are doing what their version of Islam and Allah's will are telling them must be done:destroy idolatry and destroy opposing sects/Shiites. That simple. They've done it before. I don't get what the fucking mystery is all about. And oh yeah, they now have the power and blood lusting drugged up disaffected youth looking for some excitement/real life video massacres to help them. Easy as pie.
And, oh yeah, if the thugs can pick up some loot to fund it all, all the better.
Yes, yes it is quite hard to understand. Note that I did qualify all that I wrote with my use of "western youth" in quotes in fact. That was my point and reading it again, I feel that I made it. You just missed it. I thought that the image I included would help in my sardonic intent. Another thing is that I can't stand it when I or anyone asks questions and are replied to with a "when are you going to start using your head?" or something to that effect. All I can really say to them is if I wasn't using my head I wouldn't have asked the question at all.
So to sum up:
Hard to understand and not "easy as pie" and very much so a mystery. I wish I had your skills of comprehension, no offense because you know I don't mean that.
Gilad Lotan has spotted some pretty sophisticated fake-news generation, possibly from Russia, and possibly related to my weird, larval twitterbots, aimed at convincing you that ISIS had blown up a Louisiana chemical factory.
On September 11, 2014, Lotan, a data scientist, started researching a massive, coordinated, and failed hoax to create panic over an imaginary ISIS attack on a chemical plant in Centerville, Louisiana. The hoax included Twitter, Facebook and Wikipedia identities (some apparently human piloted, others clearly automated) that had painstakingly established themselves over more than a month. Also included: fake news stories, an imaginary media outlet called "Louisiana News," and some fascinating hashtag trickery whereby a generic hashtag was built up in Russian Twitter by one set of bots, then, once trending, was handed over to a different set of English-language bots that used it to promote the hoax.
More interesting is the fact that the hoax failed. Lotan shows that Facebook's Edgerank proved to be resistant to gaming using the process employed by the hoax's creator(s); that Twitter clusters can be trumped by real news sources; and that Wikipedia's vigilance was adequate to catching fakesters who create hoax pages.
Lotan has some important thoughts on the future of fake news, hoaxes and political manipulation. One important takeaway from Lotan's analysis is that, despite the energy and technical sophistication of the attack, the hoaxer(s) made some dumb mistakes, like not giving their fake Wikipedian a richer, longer edit history; and not changing the sent-by string on their twitterbots (all the hoax tweets were sent by an app called "mass post" or "mass post2."
Finally, I'm fascinated to see that the bot-tweets were sufaced into real Twitter by long-standing, still-extant, apparently human piloted accounts from Russian Twitter. Are @GelmutKol, @Kiborian and @Galtaca sleeper agents who carry on normal Twitter discourse for years at a time, but every now and again promote botnoise into real Twitter? Are they regular users whose compromised PCs (or stolen passwords) are used to push out messages every now and again? Or are they spectacularly subtle bots themselves, computationally intensive members of the botherd who pass among humans?
Did this stuff kick off in Russia? Or was it a false flag from non-Russians using Russian Twitter to point attention overseas? Or a Russian firm working for hire on behalf of foreigners? Why try to create gwot-panics on Sept 10? It's head-spinningly futurismic.
There’s a very important lesson learned here, crystallized by the network graph to the left. No matter how much volume, how many tweets, or Facebook likes a campaign generates, if the messages aren’t embedded within existing networks of information flow, it will be very difficult for information to actually propagate. In the case of this hoax on Twitter, the malicious accounts are situated within a completely different network. So unless they attain follows from “real accounts,” they can scream as loud as they’d like, still no one will hear them. One way to bypass this is by getting your topic to trend on Twitter, increasing visibility significantly.
Social networked spaces make it increasingly difficult for a bot or malicious account to look like a real person’s account. While a profile may look convincingly real — having a valid profile picture, posting human readable texts, and sharing interesting content — it is hard for them to fake their location within the network; it is hard to get real users to follow them. We can clearly see this in the image above: the community of Russian bots are completely disconnected from any other user interacting with the hashtag.
The same principle holds for Wikipedia, which is even harder to game as it is easy to identify those accounts who are not really connected to the larger editing community. The more time you spend making relevant edits and the more trusted your account becomes the more authority you gain. One can’t simply expect to appear, make minor edits on three pages, and then put up a page detailing a terror act without seeming suspicious.
As our information landscapes evolve over time, we’ll see more examples of ways in which people abuse and game these systems for the purpose of giving visibility and attention to their chosen topic. Yet as more of our information propagation mechanisms are embedded within networks, it will become harder for malicious and automated accounts to operate in disguise. Whoever ran this hoax was extremely thorough, yet still unable to hack the network and embed the hoax within a pre-existing community of real users.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests