Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Nordic » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:37 pm wrote:Elihu » Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:30 pm wrote:Nordic » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:26 pm wrote:FWIW I put backtoiam on ignore so I don't have to read his Grade Z ignorant musings. I don't care if he gets suspended or not. I do think pulls the bell curve of RI very hard to the left.
i thought you were a hollywood camera guy whats your take on it? and what he said, he claimed some camera exp
I expressed my take on it very clearly earlier. He doesn't have a clue. There's nothing whatsoever to indicate those cell phone videos were faked. It's laughable. Put him on ignore, your brain will thank you.
like somebody said earlier, both.Novem5er » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:41 pm wrote:Maybe he's exaggerated, but its disrespectful to the victims and their families. Oh, I'm not saying that we dare not question reality because it make come across as upsetting to someone or disrespectful to our ancestors, but for fucks sake, questioning the validity of victims because they aren't covered with enough blood for your viewing pleasure? That's disgusting. He can clarify if he likes.
Regarding the video quality, it's no mystery. Yes, cellphones have decent video quality now, but are shit when it comes to bad lighting. Not to mention these are not the original videos, these are the compressed version that are shared on YouTube and ABC news. Hell, they are probably the compressed videos of compressed videos. I have video maker friends who complain all the time that YouTube makes their stuff look like shit b/c it compresses it funny. Video game makers complain because it makes their multi-million dollar game look like shit.
Bad lighting and video compression is easier to believe than ludicrous conspiracy that it's all fake: fake footage, fake people, face victims, fake witnesses, fake families, fake Facebook profiles. For fuck's sake it'd be just easier for TPTB to just shoot up a place.
Nordic wrote:By Backtoiam's standards, Cloverfield was a documentary and NYC was actually attacked by a monster. Because it looked real.![]()
Yes some of those videos are actually cell phones recording video off of OTHER cell phones. With compression every step of the way on both phones including whatever source is showing them to us and sharing it on the Internet. And yeah it's not so much "bad" lighting as mostly nonexistent lighting, i.e. darkness mixed up with nasty LED lights on the phones and a ton of fast movement which makes the compression artifacts even worse.
RI should have some standards and is usually pretty good about somehow avoiding the "never met a conspiracy theory I didn't like" people. I don't know how we pulled that off over the years but we did.
Elihu » Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:59 pm wrote:please tell me you're not about to suspend backtoiam
Nordic » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:09 pm wrote:
RI should have some standards and is usually pretty good about somehow avoiding the "never met a conspiracy theory I didn't like" people. I don't know how we pulled that off over the years but we did.
Wombaticus Rex » 13 Jun 2016 20:25 wrote:Elihu » Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:59 pm wrote:please tell me you're not about to suspend backtoiam
Yes, and yes.
This is not a Democratic Underground style thoughtcrime putsch; the suspension of bactoiam is about the ol' Socket Puppet Accusations.
There are a lot of valid questions to be asked about what happened and I'd much rather have this thread be about those than another 10 pages of the classic "What I Said Is Not What I Meant" shuffle. I wasn't particularly kidding about this probably being an ideal week for him to take some time off from ruminating on the poetics of a crime scene. We're some pretty morbid fucks, right?
JackRiddler » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:09 am wrote:This case has some extremely suspicious aspects - the father, the employer, the history of this worthless homicidal gay-hating motherfucker whom I presume is the culprit. (The easiest way for theoretical outside plotters to do something like this, not that it's the only possible way, is to get an actual single gunman to do it.)
This thread, however, once again illustrates how effectively the reflex "crisis actor" or "all fake" responses serve to distract. Discussion is mired as everyone with three working brain cells feels compelled to explain the most elementary shit to someone who will insist on not getting it, and who wants to illustrate Dunning-Kruger.
Given a dense crowd and the right weapon, the physical aspects are not astonishing. Again, speaking in theory. Same asshole with knife = you would have barely heard a story about an incident in Orlando. Even the same asshole with two pistols and unlimited clips = maybe six dead, maybe fewer.
Homophobic violence verging on the homicidal is sadly unremarkable, and I bet we've all had to deal with it. Of all the systemic hatred plagues, homophobia in my experience is really the dumbest and most reflexively, individually violent. Racists (not to make excuses) have rationales and may be able to calculate a benefit from it. Homophobes generally can't even say what gay is, if they're gay themselves, or what exactly is the imagined threat or disadvantage that it poses to them, and it can be dangerous even to discuss it with them.
82_28 » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:12 am wrote:No, Mr. Rex has already coined a new term. Socket Puppet. Knowing how well he writes I don't know if that was intentional or a mistake. Better leave it be as I am Mr. Grammer.
Given a dense crowd and the right weapon, the physical aspects are not astonishing. Again, speaking in theory. Same asshole with knife = you would have barely heard a story about an incident in Orlando. Even the same asshole with two pistols and unlimited clips = maybe six dead, maybe fewer..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests