Orlando / Pulse Mass Shooting Thread

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Luther Blissett » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:46 am

Now that it's been revealed that the shooter had profiles on Grindr, Jack'd, and Adam4Adam, and that this information did not come from Rita Katz but from members of the gay community who had been contacted by the shooter, the element of this story that I'm finding most difficult to believe is that he even traveled to the Middle East. When did that happen, where did he go, and what is the proof?
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby divideandconquer » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:05 am

Well, I agree with most everything backtoiam said so suspend me if you must, because if I can't post what I really think there is no point in posting at all.

We're all here because we're skeptical and suspicious of officialdom, of authority, and because we refuse to accept everything at face value, yet we're supposed to trust/believe everything that people post on an anonymous Internet forum. I'm not claiming anyone is lying or is a sock puppet because I've been accused of being a sock puppet and I've posted personal accounts but do I expect you to trust me 100%? Do I expect my personal account to change/influence your opinion? Absolutely not, because although I consider personal stories, I do not allow them to change my opinion without verification. It would be hypocritical of me to ask you to accept everything I say at face value when I accept nothing at face value. You don't know me just as I don't know anyone on here.

But, I get it. The challenge of the anonymous internet forums is finding a way to strike a balance between trust and skepticism. Constantly accusing each other of being sock puppets will not work, however, bullying people for differing opinions is just as bad, if not worse, yet no one was suspended for bullying backtoiam for pointing out blatant inconsistencies, lies, etc. of the mainstream narrative.

In other words, I don't have any first hand information, but if I did, I would not expect it to change your opinion simply because you have no way of verifying my story. While it's true we shouldn't call each other sock puppets, or liars, it's also true we shouldn't use one person's personal account to silence someone's opinion...again, because there is no way to verify that account, not to mention, just because people are hurt and/or killed doesn't eliminate the very real possibility that some or most of this was staged, planned, etc. All I know for certain is that I do NOT trust the official story. Beyond that I know nothing.
'I see clearly that man in this world deceives himself by admiring and esteeming things which are not, and neither sees nor esteems the things which are.' — St. Catherine of Genoa
User avatar
divideandconquer
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Elihu » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:15 am

we're all here because we're skeptical and suspicious of officialdom, of authority

I'm not sure I agree with that ; )
But take heart, because I have overcome the world.” John 16:33
Elihu
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:29 am

Lawmakers in US Filed More Than 200 Anti-LGBT Bills Prior to Massacre

Florida leads the U.S. in mass shootings in 2016
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Novem5er » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:39 am

I only called backtoiam a prick, among other things, for his complete lack of respect for the families and friends of the victims. How did he disrespect them? By boldly claiming that they simply didn't exist. But then again, he backtracked and said "I never said nobody got shot", but then again, he clearly said regarding blood-witnesses and victims "they don't exist".

Personal account time: my cousin has been balling her eyes out and having panic attacks because one of her good friends is/was in an Orlando hospital and underwent surgery to repair a gunshot wound. Fake? Not to me it isn't. Not to her. Not to the guy's friends and family. I thought about linking to Facebook profiles and putting up pictures of tweets and posts, hell I could freaking call her and record our conversation. But why? To appease the morbid, selfish desire for people to have strangers provide first-person evidence of their violence? No, I wont open up my cousin to public trolling for that.

I'm all for skepticism. That's why I'm here! It's possible that Omar was a state-actor, a brainwashed tool, that the NWO is trying to drum up support for more gun control (by attacking Liberal gays?!! Haha, right). Question the circumstances and the motives, for sure.

But to clearly state the the victims aren't REAL because you haven't seen enough blood on the streets?!! Fuck him and fuck anyone who would erase real grief and real suffering and real tragedy because they didn't get their snuff fix.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby SonicG » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:58 am

seemslikeadream » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:29 pm wrote:Lawmakers in US Filed More Than 200 Anti-LGBT Bills Prior to Massacre

Florida leads the U.S. in mass shootings in 2016


Do the math works for me...We do not have the whole story yet, but there is enough fodder, enough tight intelligence agency connections to make this a truly important moment. I would hope that the best way to honor these poor sacrificed humans is to shine a little light on the true situation...
Well the repressed gay angle seems to be sticking...those NYPD sweatshirts!
"a poiminint tidal wave in a notion of dynamite"
User avatar
SonicG
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby divideandconquer » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:28 am

Novem5er » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:39 am wrote:I only called backtoiam a prick, among other things, for his complete lack of respect for the families and friends of the victims. How did he disrespect them? By boldly claiming that they simply didn't exist. But then again, he backtracked and said "I never said nobody got shot", but then again, he clearly said regarding blood-witnesses and victims "they don't exist".

Personal account time: my cousin has been balling her eyes out and having panic attacks because one of her good friends is/was in an Orlando hospital and underwent surgery to repair a gunshot wound. Fake? Not to me it isn't. Not to her. Not to the guy's friends and family. I thought about linking to Facebook profiles and putting up pictures of tweets and posts, hell I could freaking call her and record our conversation. But why? To appease the morbid, selfish desire for people to have strangers provide first-person evidence of their violence? No, I wont open up my cousin to public trolling for that.

I'm all for skepticism. That's why I'm here! It's possible that Omar was a state-actor, a brainwashed tool, that the NWO is trying to drum up support for more gun control (by attacking Liberal gays?!! Haha, right). Question the circumstances and the motives, for sure.

But to clearly state the the victims aren't REAL because you haven't seen enough blood on the streets?!! Fuck him and fuck anyone who would erase real grief and real suffering and real tragedy because they didn't get their snuff fix.


I'm not trying to single you out. In my experience, you appear to be open minded, and to think things through before responding. In other words, I'd be very surprised to find out that you are not who you present yourself to be. So let me try to clarify what I'm trying to say using myself as an example.

I posted about my daily battle with Morgellons over the last decade. It's not recognized by officialdom, therefore there are some who are skeptical, especially since the symptoms seem to indicate some form of geoengineering...some form of synthetic life, synthetic biology embedding itself into flesh and blood. It's creepy and far out but I can testify that it's very real. However, my individual testimony doesn't amount to much on an anonymous forum. In other words, if you do not believe that Morgellons is real, or the product of geoengineering and/or some type of diabolical lab experiment I wouldn't expect my declaration to change your opinion. Not that you won't take it into consideration; but because you haven't seen it for yourself, or because you don't know me personally, I wouldn't expect you to accept it as evidence for the existence of Morgellons.

Once again, I'm very inclined to believe you, and I will take it into consideration when I try to figure out what's going on, but it doesn't really change my overall opinion that this was a psychological operation that may have involved, at the very least, some fakery. I do believe people were injured and that people died, but on the scale they reported? No way.

I thought it interesting that in 2012, Obama limited access to SS death records for three years, supposedly due to identity theft. I don't believe that's the real reason because after my father's death, I tried to use my father's credit cards to purchase some things for my mother--not more than a day or two later-- and they were disabled. We did not report his death to anyone at that time, but the funeral home reported his death to Soc Sec right away and they didn't waste any time.

Researchers Wring Hands as U.S. Clamps Down on Death Record Access
'I see clearly that man in this world deceives himself by admiring and esteeming things which are not, and neither sees nor esteems the things which are.' — St. Catherine of Genoa
User avatar
divideandconquer
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Nordic » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:37 am

I do believe people were injured and that people died, but on the scale they reported? No way.



And why is that? See, this makes no sense to me.

If you're gonna ruthlessly slaughter some people, why fake anything? Why does it make any sense at all to NOT leave a big pile of bodies if you are terrorizing and psychologically brutalizing people in the first place?

The whole way this sort of OP works -- if it is an op, like 9/11 clearly was -- is to literally DO THE UNTHINKABLE. Could you please explain the logic in killing just a few and pretending to kill more, or whetever the thinking is behind this notion?

History proves that the standard MO for these kinds of things, from JFK to RFK to 9/11 to Colosio to San Bernadino is that you ACTUALLY KILL THE PEOPLE and have carefully set up a PATSY or PATSIES to take the blame.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby stickdog99 » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:46 am

And our corporate propaganda outlets all breathlessly reported the "911 call in which the shooter pledged his allegiance to ISIS."

And nobody asks for a transcript or even a timestamp. And nobody asks anything about what the emergency department's response to this 911 call was. And nobody tries to locate or interview the those at the emergency department who took this 911 call. And nobody asks why a Shiite Muslim who supposedly claimed family connections to Hezbollah, a Shiite organization that is a bitter enemy of the so-called Islamic State, would pledge his allegiance to the Sunni Islamic State.

But our corporate propaganda outlets have no problem with unquestioningly releasing bizarre FBI released details about what are now termed multiple 911 calls. (How many? When? From where?)

Hank Shaw, head of the FBI's field office in Boston, said in a statement to NBC News that "During one of the 911 calls between the operator and Omar Mir Seddique Mateen, Mateen made a reference to the Tsarnaev brothers by calling them his 'homeboys.' At this point in time, all evidence collected to date shows no connection between Mateen and the Tsarnaev brothers."
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6576
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Nordic » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:48 am

Yeah I think i laughed audibly when I read about the alleged 911 calls.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby brainpanhandler » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:52 am

Nordic » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:37 am wrote:
I do believe people were injured and that people died, but on the scale they reported? No way.

Could you please explain the logic in killing just a few and pretending to kill more, or whetever the thinking is behind this notion?


No shit, right?

Fuck you Backtoiam. Fuck you Elihu. Fuck you agent dipshit. And fuck you divideandconquer.
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby semper occultus » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:07 pm

stickdog99 » 14 Jun 2016 15:46 wrote:And nobody asks why a Shiite Muslim who supposedly claimed family connections to Hezbollah, a Shiite organization that is a bitter enemy of the so-called Islamic State, would pledge his allegiance to the Sunni Islamic State.


...that was a holy crap moment....but are we sure about this...

Local news is now reporting that the Orlando murderer was connected to an extremist Sunni imam in Orlando who did indeed preach hatred towards homosexuals at his extreme Timbuktu Seminary in town. This preacher was known to law enforcement officials and had a record.

A few months ago, the Husseini Islamic Center in nearby Sanford, Florida hosted an Iranian Shi'ite Cleric who called for the death sentence for all homosexuals.
 
While there is no known connection between this individual (who is from a Sunni community) and this Shi'ite mosque


http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.724728
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:08 pm

all evidence collected to date shows no connection between Mateen and the Tsarnaev brothers.



except for the prior FBI interest :)
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby brekin » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:09 pm

I agree staging terror seems silly when those who deal in it don't seem to hold human life all that sacred, so why put on a production?

But I think the lesson in all these shootings comes down to, hate versus love.

Perhaps people should consider which they are posting out of now?

If it is hate, then it seems the terror, regardless of who was responsible, was effective.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Hey! How about Orlando Now? (shootings)

Postby Novem5er » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:13 pm

divideandconquer » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:28 am wrote:I'm not trying to single you out. In my experience, you appear to be open minded, and to think things through before responding. In other words, I'd be very surprised to find out that you are not who you present yourself to be. So let me try to clarify what I'm trying to say using myself as an example.

I posted about my daily battle with Morgellons over the last decade. It's not recognized by officialdom, therefore there are some who are skeptical, especially since the symptoms seem to indicate some form of geoengineering...some form of synthetic life, synthetic biology embedding itself into flesh and blood. It's creepy and far out but I can testify that it's very real. However, my individual testimony doesn't amount to much on an anonymous forum.


I agree. Anonymous people on the Internet don't exactly exude legitimacy. People do fake things. People lie. People troll. We have to take everything we read as a grain of salt.

I'm not asking backtoiam, or anyone else, to believe my personal account, BUT when they cite the LACK of personal accounts as "evidence" that the violence is fake . . . well, we can see the circular logic.

It wasn't backtoiam's questioning that I find offensive, it was his absolute certainty that it was fake and that people didn't exist that pissed me off. He already made up his mind and demanded bloody proof to change it. It was his callous dismissal of what evidence there was because there wasn't enough of it, it had poor lighting, and it wasn't bloody enough. And then there is the sheer stupidity about it.

As others are saying above, if you're willing to kill a dozen people, why not 49?! It's easier just to actually do it, then to do it on a smaller scale and fake the rest. It's just a ridiculous line of thinking, especially when it literally diminishes what we all are actually fighting for: human dignity.

I read a story where the father of one of the Sandy Hook victims actually flew down to meet with some of the Crisis Actor Conspiracy people. He brought family photos. He brought a death certificate. He brought everything he could to try and prove that his son existed. That his life was real and that his father's grief was real. Why did the father feel so compelled to do that? I don't know. I lost my mother-in-law to gun violence not two years back. It was terrible. My wife and I are still recovering emotionally. If someone just told me that it was fake?! It'd eat at me, too. One person I could just brush off, but when its thousands of internet trolls? It's just wrong.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests