NASA Satellite stops on a dime!? WTF!!!

[82_28]

Also, one tracked minds exist. Throw something out in other threads. Why do you only post to this one?

[DrEvil]

MaxTheKnife

[OP ED]

Does COINTELPRO have dental?

[Burnt Hill]

There is no force that pulls down. This is extremely simple to understand. Even if you believe that gravity exists you must also recognize the downward pressure coming from the atmosphere stacked above. If you cannot acknowledge that no amount of words/images/videos will help.

If you drop an apple inside a vacuum chamber, will it fall towards the earth ?

Yes clearly, the medium cannot support it. Youre just changing variables and still not understanding that there is no force pulling downwards.

So, it isn't 'downward pressure' that makes a thing fall towards the earth then ? What is it that makes the apple fall downwards rather than staying at the position it was released at ? There is a force acting on the apple - it is either pulling it or pushing it towards the earth; what is the name of this force and where does it come from ?

There is nothing below the apple to support it therefor it falls being denser than nothing. The atmosphere that pushes us downwards us resisted by the fact that we stand atop a denser medium. This is elementary level simplicity and should you had not been indoctrinated into believing big G you could easily understand this.

So put an apple and a tennis ball in a vacuum,
the apple is denser,
according to your theory what should happen?

You could also use a hammer and a feather like they did on the moon,
from where they could see the round earth spinning as a sphere.

[82_28]

MaxTheKnife

Ah yes. I thought so!

[Burnt Hill]

MaxTheKnife

Ah yes. I thought so!

Was there a thread that suggested Max ultimately had some valid points, or did I dream that?

[DrEvil]

^^Pretty sure you dreamed it. All he did was to draw arbitrary lines on pictures of Mars and mirror parts of images to make "faces" and whatnot, kinda like kids painting one side of the paper and folding it to make a butterfly.

Here's the thread he started: http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/ ... =8&t=27470

[Nordic]

Maco144 has gotta be a troll shining us on. Nobody is this .... dumb. And still able to write sentences and stuff.

That is uncalled for. I think it is why the forum has a lot more readers than posters. People fear ridicule.

Yeah a lot of attacks against me by people sitting on the sidelines not even choosing to participate intelligently. It's exactly what I expected when I made my original comment about the old guard not having any rigorous integrity when it comes to this issue.

You also wrote:

What you should really be asking is why there are no satellite videos/pics of Earth.

Which is yet another reason I'm accusing you of being a troll. An entertaining one, apparently.

[backtoiam]

Yeah I thought we had a young truth seeker on our hands until the satellite comment. Now i'm dubious.

[Searcher08]

@maco144
Still interested in your response on the SAA and Qantas flights and seeking an explanation of their existence within the flat earth model.

Of course, there is also....

[maco144]

Also, one tracked minds exist. Throw something out in other threads. Why do you only post to this one?

You keep asking questions about my personal life. I fail to see how it is anything other than a distraction from the topic at hand. I post in this thread because I've done the research and I'm willing to take the time to share what the correct FE model looks like. If I feel I have things valuable to say in other threads I contribute.

[maco144]

What you should really be asking is why there are no satellite videos/pics of Earth.

Which is yet another reason I'm accusing you of being a troll. An entertaining one, apparently.

Why dont you look for some authentic, non doctored, non composite images of earth. A video of Earth in space should exist by now too. Maybe your sleuthing skills are better than the entire FE community which has yet to find one.

[maco144]

@maco144
Still interested in your response on the SAA and Qantas flights and seeking an explanation of their existence within the flat earth model.

Of course, there is also....

I've said that I am unable to rectify some of the flight differences. I think there are other flight paths that simply make more sense on a FE model then globular.

[maco144]

There is no force that pulls down. This is extremely simple to understand. Even if you believe that gravity exists you must also recognize the downward pressure coming from the atmosphere stacked above. If you cannot acknowledge that no amount of words/images/videos will help.

If you drop an apple inside a vacuum chamber, will it fall towards the earth ?

Yes clearly, the medium cannot support it. Youre just changing variables and still not understanding that there is no force pulling downwards.

So, it isn't 'downward pressure' that makes a thing fall towards the earth then ? What is it that makes the apple fall downwards rather than staying at the position it was released at ? There is a force acting on the apple - it is either pulling it or pushing it towards the earth; what is the name of this force and where does it come from ?

There is nothing below the apple to support it therefor it falls being denser than nothing. The atmosphere that pushes us downwards us resisted by the fact that we stand atop a denser medium. This is elementary level simplicity and should you had not been indoctrinated into believing big G you could easily understand this.

So put an apple and a tennis ball in a vacuum,
the apple is denser,
according to your theory what should happen?

You could also use a hammer and a feather like they did on the moon,
from where they could see the round earth spinning as a sphere.

Both items fall at the same rate because a critical density has been reached in relation to the medium. Since they are directly proportional, the denser the medium the denser the object needed to fall through. Since in a vacuum the critical density is 0 objects fall at the same rate.

[Elihu]

rigorous people, don't whine about trolls. I find the traditional position way more based on second hand assumptions and statements of the state. All those who would? And why questions are good ones to ponder.