Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[Wombaticus Rex]

re: the taco trucks on every corner, has anyone noted that the Obama administration oversaw more deportations than any other president in history and that there's no reason to believe that Clinton would not continue the practice? My social media has had the anachronistic flavor of Clinton standing for taco trucks, but the sad reality is that she is against.

I have been screaming about this in several threads and many other venues, yes.

I talk to way, way, way too many NPR/NYT informed people talking about "Trump's Gestapo" as if it didn't already exist.

It's probably a really bad sign that I've relapsed into my habit of trying to tell people things about stuff.

[Searcher08]

[quote="Luther Blissett » Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:50 pm"]re: the taco trucks on every corner, has anyone noted that the Obama administration oversaw more deportations than any other president in history and that there's no reason to believe that Clinton would not continue the practice? My social media has had the anachronistic flavor of Clinton standing for taco trucks, but the sad reality is that she is against.[/quoteI

Wondering whether you have come across any interest in your circles, Luther, in dialog / conversation between the Jill Stein and Gary Johnson groups?

[The Consul]

Things are really quite bizaro. Factor in Ailes controversy to the media swamp and it is apparent that the upper echelons of American power are full of people walking round in sticky pants.
And yes some dipshit claiming Hillary stumbling up the stairs is a sign of smaldororism syndrome is more newsworthy than why we went into Lybia in the first place and Donald Trump’s doctor, is he really The Dude, or did that really happen, could he? Could DT, possibly be healthier than Teddy Roosevelt? You decide! Yes you, and you get to do so because the fourth estate has disintegrated into such a state that the major corporate media now reports on subjects the World Daily News gives a pass.
It can’t all be blamed on Donald Trump anymore than Hillary Clinton. Compromised figureheads make the best footservants, after all.
But of course what’s most important is whether the media is favoring one rapacious clown over the other. Hmmmm, lessee, which one is not being given the tit. It’s like that old Firesign Theater clip, Her Royal Majesty’es 104th annual farting match at Kingston Greens. If you are going to subject yourself to it you must do so with the intention of finding a laugh. The anticipation is all built around who, you must ask yourself, who, dammit, is going to shit their pants in a try to hard exhuberance in the midst of her royal eminence. Whoever it is you know it will have to be one long in the club. Cause not just anyone can do that in front of the queen.
For those who waste their time arguing one clown over the other, who care more about being able to scoff at the losing side on Nov 9th, more than they conceive of the hell toward which we hurl, the horserace is a form of personal entertainment.
I predict after this election there will be a comic book version of The Apocalypse that will lend itself well to a Hollywood version of Jesus in a super-loin suit, with whip and sword, vanquishing the unforgiven multitudes in a gory 3D display of 21st c CGI.. Maybe The Devil and The Mahdi will be part of the cast, with cameos of Sam Harris & R Dawkins, and a soundtrack by Glen. Benton along with a mad scientist from the CSSR who by trying to figure it out somehow causes it to happen.
To keep the masses titilated in the between times, New and more powerful cannibal drugs will be developed and distributed widely before the next general election. And if we’re lucky Donnie & Hill will give each other another go one more time in 2020. You know you want it, admit it.
Maybe next time you can defend the other one, who knows?
America just can't move on without remakes.

[Luther Blissett]

Wondering whether you have come across any interest in your circles, Luther, in dialog / conversation between the Jill Stein and Gary Johnson groups?

I have seen a little bit of this in Green social media groups, but for the most part I would say characterize Greens as diametrically opposed to libertarianism.

[Rory]

Wondering whether you have come across any interest in your circles, Luther, in dialog / conversation between the Jill Stein and Gary Johnson groups?

I have seen a little bit of this in Green social media groups, but for the most part I would say characterize Greens as diametrically opposed to libertarianism.

I would have thought this was obvious. The only thing they have in common is the belief that they could do a better job than the status quo.

[NeonLX]

Wondering whether you have come across any interest in your circles, Luther, in dialog / conversation between the Jill Stein and Gary Johnson groups?

I have seen a little bit of this in Green social media groups, but for the most part I would say characterize Greens as diametrically opposed to libertarianism.

I would have thought this was obvious. The only thing they have in common is the belief that they could do a better job than the status quo.

Yep. And both are anti-war, at least from what I can tell.

[Rory]

Wondering whether you have come across any interest in your circles, Luther, in dialog / conversation between the Jill Stein and Gary Johnson groups?

I have seen a little bit of this in Green social media groups, but for the most part I would say characterize Greens as diametrically opposed to libertarianism.

I would have thought this was obvious. The only thing they have in common is the belief that they could do a better job than the status quo.

Yep. And both are anti-war, at least from what I can tell.

Libertarians are more anti them paying for the war, not against war on principle.

[backtoiam]

And she is practically running neck and neck in the polls with Trump, yeahhh right. I bet her ego is blistered.

[seemslikeadream]

so we have a lot of little nazis in this country following Trump around.....is that your point?

I doubt Clinton cares to have any of Trump's little ones at her rallies....so I don't think her ego is shaken at all

[backtoiam]

No not at all. Look at the Sanders rally it looks just like the Trump rallies. My point is simply that Bernie and Trump are filling stadiums and Hillary can barely scratch a hand full of people. I just don't see how she could be running neck and neck with Trump. If it were Bernie and Hillary in the runoff my observation would be the same. Only glaring visual realization of just how rigged the polls have to be for this to occur.

[seemslikeadream]

Hitler had a lot of people at his rallies also ...so there's that...

[backtoiam]

Hitler had a lot of people at his rallies also ...so there's that...

You did notice that one of the pictures above is a Bernie rally in a stadium filled to capacity didn't you?

[seemslikeadream]

yep and the size of rallies means nothing ....

it's their base...not a sign of "regular" people in this country

god knows half the Bernie supporters were closet Socialists who turned on a dime against Bernie after he lost the nom

[Sounder]

it's their base...not a sign of "regular" people in this country

Yes but her 'base' will not even be seen in public because they are a bunch of elitists and war mongering neo-cons and neo-liberals, (neo-cons with less snarl).

As to the 'regular' people, generally they distrust her, maybe because they see she is a lying sack of excrement.

[seemslikeadream]

that's true....but Trump's people are still little nazis who love the smell of hate.