Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Novem5er » Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:07 pm

Iamwhomiam » Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:43 pm wrote:
"It's 99% bullshit, but it kind of fits in here at RI..."


Let's not repeat this, ok Novem5er? If it's 99% BS, why even mention it?

Because it appears on a few alt-right sites?

PM it to D&C, so he can add it to his ever-growing collection of 100% biased BS, so he can forward it on to 8bit, where it will be appreciated.

Nordic, you're giving me reason to change my Stein vote to instead vote for Hillary. Please stop before you've convinced me to switch.


I posted so that people would be aware that others are talking about it and spreading it around as truth. If one of us encountered mention of it somewhere else, then maybe a heads up would help eliminate confusion. It was passed to me as a "real" document and I wasted a good 20 minutes looking into it before I realize it was so over-the-top that it had to be fake. (I didn't read the last page until later b/c I got distracted!). Information awareness.

What I didn't want to do was post some garbage from the alt-right without identifying it as such right from the beginning.

On top of that, I thought people might get a laugh out of it.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Agent Orange Cooper » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:22 pm

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CNN severs ties with Donna Brazile
By HADAS GOLD 10/31/16 12:36 PM EDT

CNN says it is "completely uncomfortable" with hacked emails showing that former contributor and interim Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile shared questions with the Clinton campaign before a debate and a town hall during the Democratic primary, and has accepted her resignation.

Hacked emails posted by WikiLeaks show Brazile, whose CNN contract was suspended when she became interim DNC chair over the summer, sharing with the Clinton campaign a question that would be posed to Hillary Clinton before the March CNN Democratic debate in Flint, as well as a possible question prior to a CNN town hall, also in March.

In a statement, CNN spokeswoman Lauren Pratapas said that on Oct. 14, the network accepted Brazile’s resignation.

“On October 14th, CNN accepted Donna Brazile’s resignation as a CNN contributor. [Her deal had previously been suspended in July when she became the interim head of the DNC.] CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate. We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor,” Pratapas said.

In a tweet, Brazile thanked CNN and her now former colleagues there.

“Thank you @CNN. Honored to be a Democratic Strategist and commentator on the network. Godspeed to all my former colleagues,” she wrote.

A CNN employee, speaking on background, suggested Brazile may have met the woman who was supposed to pose the question about lead poisoning during a service event planned the day before the debate.

As for the town hall event, a follow up email from Brazile posted by WikiLeaks on Monday and other emails obtained by POLITICO seem to point to Roland Martin, a TV One host who was co-moderating the Town Hall, as the source of the questions.
User avatar
Agent Orange Cooper
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:57 pm

FBI's Comey opposed naming Russians, citing election timing: Source
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-com ... ource.html
Donald Trump warns that 650 million immigrants could come to the U.S. in a week. Let’s do the math!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... -the-math/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)


Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:13 pm

how many are on Trump's Russia thing?

oh and Trump's phony charity?

oh that's right the FBI only leaking Clinton stuff..never mind

FBI's Comey opposed naming Russians, citing election timing: Source
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-com ... ource.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Sounder » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:21 pm

how many are on Trump's Russia thing?

oh and Trump's phony charity?


Oh that's too bad SLAD, :cry: but this is the Hillary thread after all.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:22 pm

did you miss my Clinton reference?

oh that's right the FBI only leaking Clinton stuff..never mind



tell it to Agent Orange Cooper...he was having a conversation about Clinton in the Trump thread and I just continued it here ...sue me or deport me...what would Trump do? :P


just to be crystal clear

I did a search through all your posts and you are non-binary. You do not support Hilary and do not support Trump... nor (from what I saw) the Greens nor the Libertarians, nor a Third Party



Searcher08 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:45 am wrote:
seemslikeadream » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:37 pm wrote:“It is my belief that nearly any invented quotation, played with confidence, stands a good chance to deceive.” ~ Mark Twain


still waiting

seemslikeadream » Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:02 am wrote:
seemslikeadream » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:56 pm wrote:
8bitagent » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:50 pm wrote:Forget Donald Trump's proposed giant wall, SLAD's endless wall of text is enough to keep anyone out. ;)

That said, to Jerky and SLAD, our two lone Hillary defenders...I will concede this point:
Hillary I thought did her best performance tonight. Was poised, laid out a great progressive-ish
rights case in the beginning. And unlike the "Hillary is sick" conspiracies, Trump was the one
who looked rather sickly tonight. Either that or he smoked quite a big doobie



please link to all the defense of Hillary posts I have made

on edit

and the posts I made defending a woman's right not to be blamed for her husband/boyfriends deeds do not count


still waiting


:lol2: I did a search through all your posts and you are non-binary. You do not support Hilary and do not support Trump... nor (from what I saw) the Greens nor the Libertarians, nor a Third Party.You do love Denis Kucinich... but he loved Ron Paul.

I think a woman deserves to be blamed if she is a knowing accomplice to illegal acts her husband is doing. The Clinton Foundation is a sewer of corruption. She personally drove the Libya debacle.

At least Trump doesnt take Saudi money, AFAIK
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Rory » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:52 pm

Obama Secretly Working for Russia

"The president doesn't believe that Director Comey is intentionally trying to influence the outcome of an election," he said. "The president doesn't believe that he's secretly strategizing to benefit one candidate or one political party."

And though he would not weigh in on Comey's letter, Earnest said Obama maintains a high opinion of Comey and has confidence in his ability to do his job.

"Director Comey is a man of integrity, he's a man of principle, and he's a man of good character,"
Last edited by Rory on Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:53 pm

from the people who would love to suppress the vote for Clinton...you know the racists that don't want black people to vote

Published on
Monday, October 31, 2016
byCommon Dreams
New Lawsuit Challenges Effort to Stamp Out African-American Vote in NC
North Carolina is 'ground zero in the intentional, surgical efforts by Republicans to suppress the voice of voters'
byAndrea Germanos, staff writer


"This is our Selma and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue," said Rev. William Barber II, president of the NC NAACP. (Photo: Bryan Bruchman/flickr/cc)
With just over a week to go before Election Day, the North Carolina NAACP on Monday filed a lawsuit to stop what it describes as a Republican-led effort to snuff out the African-American vote.

"This is our Selma and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue," said Rev. William Barber II, president of the organization.

According to the civil rights organization, wrongful challenges to voters' eligibility are happening in at least three counties—Beaufort, Moore, and Cumberland—and are disproportionately affecting African Americans.

The suit (pdf) states that "a small number of individuals have recently challenged the registration of approximately 4,500 voters, based exclusively on mass mailings that were returned as undeliverable." A press statement from the group says the challenges stem from "a coordinated campaign led by individuals with GOP ties." Registration cancellations based on that alone is in violation of the National Voting Registration Act, the group says.

The complaint, filed Monday in federal court in the Middle District of North Carolina, states, "in many cases, voters purged by Defendants still reside at the addresses where they are registered to vote, or have moved within the county and remain eligible to vote there."

The suit is asking for the wrongfully canceled voting registrations to be restored.

Among the plaintiffs is James Edward Arthur Sr., who's lived in Beaufort County his entire life. He is African American and has been a registered voter for five years. He was among the over 130 voters in that county to have his registration cancelled based on the challenge of an undeliverable mass mailing—even though he moved within the county.

"I did not receive notice from the State or Beaufort County that my voter registration had been challenged, or that a hearing had been set to determine whether I would remain on the State’s list of eligible voters," he said, referring to the procedure that election officials must follow when a challenge has been made.

"If I knew my right to vote was in jeopardy, I would do whatever I could to protect it. I want and plan to vote in the upcoming election, but I am concerned that since my registration has been canceled I will not be able to cast a ballot or it will not be counted," he added.

Fall Fundraising Banner

Another plaintiff is James L. Cox, also African American and another lifelong resident of Beaufort County. His voting eligibility was also part of the en masse challenges—even though he currently resides at the address on his voting records.

The suit—filed months after a federal appeals court said the state's voter ID law was created "with discriminatory intent"—says that though African Americans make up less than 26 percent of the county's residents, they account for over 65 percent of the challenges.

"The Tar Heel state is ground zero in the intentional, surgical efforts by Republicans to suppress the voice of voters," Barber added. "We're taking this emergency step to make sure not a single voters' voice is unlawfully taken away."

The suit also comes as voters in the state take part in "the Souls to the Polls" initiative.

Montica Taulmidge, a former organizer in Raleigh, told CBS it's "an opportunity for people to come with their congregations right after church and to vote as a community of faith."

"Our communities of faith are super important to us so being a part of a church family," she said, "and saying we are going to be civically minded, we are going to be civically active and engage in this process, is a huge deal for a lot of people."

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/1 ... an-vote-nc
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Sounder » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:55 pm

tell it to Agent Orange Cooper...he was having a conversation about Clinton in the Trump thread and I just continued it here ...sue me or deport me...what would Trump do?


It sounds quite irresponsible to put something down on AOC when you are the one that can't stop vomiting Trump, even on the Hillary thread.(Or the, but mommy, tommy did it too, defense.)

Your repeated, for no good reason, defense of your non-partisan creds is laughable, more so every time you repeat it.

But you do what you want, become an astro turfer par-excel-lance.

All right, go for it SLAD, ATTACK MODE, more fogweed please.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:57 pm

sure whatever you say sounder..are you in love with Trump?

when rabid right wing bullshit is posted here I am going to call it out for sure...and will continue to do so

sorry to get you so upset ..I know how you feel

when Clinton gets a trial date let me know will ya?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby peartreed » Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:21 pm

What Nordic asked me is:

“So why are you so emotionally invested in playing into that blatant manipulation of YOUR emotions? You should resent that! And be deeply offended by that!”

All I can ask in turn is that he simply repeat his question into a mirror.

Supporters of each of the candidates are emotionally and ideologically invested in what they have been personally convinced of as the truth and the facts of their advocacy. Unfortunately, no one has that exclusive omnipotence. All we can do is call it as we see it. Projecting cruel judgment upon opposing views is mostly a futile attempt at persuasion, and it only makes the critic seem as hysterical as the hyperbole used in hammering home their argument.

From my biased perspective Clinton is the lesser of two evils because she has the practical experience of political office, the poise , perspective and personality to perform properly and pragmatically as a practicing president . Trump does not.

All the built-in checks and balances of the highest office won’t offset his idiocy.
User avatar
peartreed
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:20 pm

Oof. James Carville having a total mental meltdown earlier today on MSNBC, lividly mumbling about KGB conspiracies. After the endless smug holier than thou
superiority on television and in private by the Democrat big wigs and pundits, I can't help but have a good laugh about all this. Thanks Anthony Weiner!

"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Sounder » Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:27 pm

sure whatever you say sounder..are you in love with Trump?


I have never in my life voted for a major party presidential candidate. It amounts to little more than a distraction from pressing issues and a chance for grifters to place their bets. Is anything different this time around?

And you think too highly of yourself if you think you just 'got me upset'.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:28 pm

Rory » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:52 pm wrote:Obama Secretly Working for Russia

"The president doesn't believe that Director Comey is intentionally trying to influence the outcome of an election," he said. "The president doesn't believe that he's secretly strategizing to benefit one candidate or one political party."

And though he would not weigh in on Comey's letter, Earnest said Obama maintains a high opinion of Comey and has confidence in his ability to do his job.

"Director Comey is a man of integrity, he's a man of principle, and he's a man of good character,"


All sarcasm aside, this is a smart political (as well as historically cognizant) stance on Obama's part. Pulling a Saturday Night Massacre one week before the election would basically give Trump the presidency on a silver platter. I'm not even sure if his wife had to talk him into "going high" on this particular. He's just allowing all relevant judicial machinery to "please proceed."
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Gone baby gone
Blog: View Blog (37)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests