>There is so much evidence.
There really isn't though. Not at all.
>For me, the running theme in Tony Podesta's extremely expensive art collection is the persuasive stuff.
It's not a "running theme" throughout his art collection. These works are by established artists, not custom commissions, and again, they are evidence of nothing other than the fact that Podesta purchased and owns them. It doesn't tell you anything about the man other than his taste in art.
>Djurdjevic, Grannan, Bourgeois, Abramovic.
Yes, these are the artists who produced some of the work that has somehow led people to believe that Podesta is involved in committing some of the worst crimes imaginable. Based entirely on his taste in art. I think that's a lot more shocking than any of the art he has collected!
Also, say what you want about Abramovic's work, or her politics, but she is recognized as an art world superstar pretty much the world over.
>And then throw in Alefantis's entire Instagram account.
I've been following PG from the get-go and I have yet to see evidence of anything worse than occasional bouts of bad taste, dark humor between friends and family, and things that might seem strange but only if totally divorced from their context.
>The pics of pizza sexualized,
He's a young gay man with artistic pretensions who owns a pizza parlor. Him and his friends creating or sharing naughty images that incorporated pizza was not only not unusual, it was probably inevitable! In fact, there is NO evidence for Comet Ping Pong Pizza being anything other than a typical urban pizza restaurant with a bar and a live music venue. Because it is located so close to Washington DC, and is owned by a popular, successful young homosexual man - who was also in a relationship with a well-connected Democratic political activist for a time - he occasionally had some business thrown his way by organizations and individuals connected to the Democratic party, and was friends with a few of them. That's it.
>the taped-to-a-table kid, the dude hugging the baby with the beads around them...
Try imagining you were encountering those images prior to having become infected by the PG viral meme. A smiling little girl with her arms Scotch-taped to the table top does not, to me, conjure up images of ritual abuse or pedophilia. Rather, it's the kind of photograph that a mom or an uncle or a trusted babysitter might enlist the kid's complicity in mounting, to create an image that would give their immediate circle of family and friends a chuckle. "Suzy got into the cookie jar again today... but that won't be a problem anymore! LOL!" I think the number of people who find it to be suspect is so shockingly high simply because they first see it after being infected by the meme. There is nothing in the photograph, itself, that suggests anything even inappropriate, much less criminal.
>Heavy Breathing's posters.
Some are in bad taste, but none of them proof of anything, nor are they evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, of a crime.
>Besta's logo.
Before you can say that the Besta logo is evidence for anything, there are a number of questions you have to clear up first.
Who created the logo? Did the owners do it themselves, or did they hire someone to do it? Once you find out who created it, you then have to try and find out if there's any reason to believe that they'd be knowledgeable about the symbols allegedly used by an underground movement of predatory pedophiles. After all, the logo looks like a slice of pizza with a twist in it so that it also looks like a letter B. When you take into account the fact that the place seems to be just a regular old pizza spot - they don't host live bands or anything like that - and with the understanding that covert symbols and codes are by definition not common knowledge, unfortunate coincidence seems like a far more likely explanation. After all, if the owners of Besta pizza really were pedophiles, broadcasting that fact to the world through the logo for their business would pretty much be the dumbest move in the history of dumb moves.
>The Silsby/Haiti stuff.
This is another puzzle piece that you pretty much have to take the scissors to if you want it to fit where you're trying to stick it. Silsby's work in Haiti, and the Clintons' role in helping her out of a jam there, have been completely misrepresented and spun into a narrative that is far more sinister and nefarious than the facts of the case can possibly support. I offer, in contrast, a report that shows you what a REAL negative critical assessment of Silsby's actions - and the Clintons' role in getting her off the hook in Haiti - should look like:
http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/upload ... 9/King.pdf>Like I said, pick five that aren't the usual three things debunkers use as a crutch,
Hmmm...
>Ah, but I should be ignoring you. I doubt you asked the question sincerely.
Double Hmmm...
XO
by Wombaticus Rex » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:19 pm 
