Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

[stickdog99]

Urgent call to action! The FDA wants to approve Pfizer mRNA shots for 19 million kids ages 6-months to 4-years old. There is no data to support such a decision. We have 14 days to stop the FDA from committing a crime against humanity.

This news came out last night but it is so horrifying that I could not write about it until now.

Pfizer wants their disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that they can have liability protection forever.

The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2- to 4-years old failed in the clinical trial.

Acting FDA Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, following orders from the Biden administration said, (I’m paraphrasing here) ‘don’t worry about the fact that the shot does not work, we’ve got a drug to sell, submit an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application anyway.’

So today Pfizer submitted an EUA application for children six-months to four-years old.

Neither the FDA nor Pfizer have any idea how many shots they will recommend. Pfizer says maybe three shots will work when two did not. There is no data to support that hypothesis.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will meet in two weeks — on February 15 — to evaluate this EUA application THAT HAS NO DATA.

That’s what we are up against.

So warriors, you know what to do. I need you to get on the phone, get your fax machines humming, and start sending out emails like the future of this country depends on it — because it does. Today is Feb. 1. Physical paper letters sent via the U.S. Postal Service in the next couple days will probably get there in time too.

In October we generated tens of thousands of calls, emails, and faxes. Our goal in the next two weeks must be to generate hundreds of thousands of calls, emails, faxes, and letters.

The message we need to send to these bureaucrats is — ABSOLUTELY NOT! Every single person who plays a role in this decision needs to know that we are watching, there is zero data to support this EUA application, and they must vote NO because this proposed use violates the Nuremberg Code’s prohibitions against illegal medical experiments. Anyone who goes along with Janet Woodcock’s bullying on behalf of the cartel will be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

It’s hard to know exactly who will be at the VRBPAC meeting because the FDA uses Temporary Voting Members and the VRBPAC has not met since we exposed them as frauds back in October (when they rubber stamped Pfizer’s EUA application for kids 5 to 11 in spite of no data). But the best guess is that the voting members will be roughly the same as the last meeting so that is who we are reaching out to now.

Here are the 23 people we need to reach before Tuesday, February 15:

Janet Woodcock
Acting FDA Commissioner
FDA, mail stop: HFD-001
10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO51-6133
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (301) 796-5400
fax: (301) 847-8752
Janet.Woodcock@fda.hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/DrWoodcockFDA

Rochelle Walensky
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Roybal Building 21, Rm 12000
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333
phone: (404) 639-7000
Aux7@cdc.gov
https://twitter.com/CDCDirector

Xavier Becerra
Secretary, Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
c/o Sean McCluskie
sean.mccluskie@hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/XavierBecerra

Peter Marks
Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
FDA, Mail stop: HFM-2
10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71-7232
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-8116
fax: (301) 595-1310
Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov

Acting Chair, VRBPAC
Arnold Monto, M.D.
Professor of Public Health & Epidemiology
Department of Epidemiology
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
phone: (734) 764-5453
fax: (734) 764-3192
asmonto@umich.edu

Paula Annunziato, M.D.
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck
North Wales, PA 19454
paula.annunziato@merck.com

Captain Amanda Cohn
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333 MS C-09
phone: (404) 639-6039
fax: (404) 315-4679
acohn@cdc.gov
anc0@cdc.gov

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, CA 94305
phone: (650) 723-5682
fax: (650) 725-8040
hgans@stanford.edu

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20852
phone: (301) 435-0178
Michael.kurilla@nih.gov

H. Cody Meissner, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, MA 02111
phone: (617) 636-5227
fax: (617) 636-4300
cmeissner@tuftsmedicalcenter.org

Paul Offit, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
Abramson Research Building
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA 19104
phone: (215) 590-2020
offit@chop.edu
https://twitter.com/DrPaulOffit

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, WA 98109
phone: (206) 667-7126
spergam@fredhutch.org
https://twitter.com/PergamIC

Temporary Voting Members (but their votes count all the same)

A. Oveta Fuller, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Michigan Medical School
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
phone: (734) 647-3830
fullerao@umich.edu

James Hildreth, Sr., Ph.D., M.D.
Professor
Department of Internal Medicine
School of Medicine
President and Chief Executive Officer
Meharry Medical College
Nashville, TN 37205
officeofthepresident@mmc.edu
https://twitter.com/JamesEKHildreth

Jeannette Lee, Ph.D.
Professor Department of Biostatistics
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, AR 72701
phone: (501) 526-6712
JYLee@uams.edu

Ofer Levy, M.D., Ph.D.
Staff Physician & Principal Investigator
Director, Precision Vaccines Program
Division of Infectious Diseases
Boston Children’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School Associate Member
phone: (617) 919-2900
fax: (617) 730-0254
ofer.levy@childrens.harvard.edu
https://twitter.com/levy_o

Patrick Moore, M.D., M.P.H.
Distinguished and American Cancer Society Professor
Pittsburgh Foundation Chair in Innovative Cancer Research
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
phone: (412) 623-7721
psm9@pitt.edu

Michael Nelson, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Asthma, Allergy and Immunology Division
UVA Division of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology
PO Box 801355
Charlottesville, VA 22908
phone: (434) 297-8399
fax: (434) 924-5779
mrn8d@virginia.edu

Stanley Perlman, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
University of Iowa
3-712 Bowen Science Building (BSB)
51 Newton Rd
Iowa City, IA 52242
phone: (319) 335-8549
stanley-perlman@uiowa.edu

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Director,
Division of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics
2401 Gillham Road Kansas City, MO 64108
phone: (816) 960-8885
fax: (816) 960-8888
Jportnoy@cmh.edu

Eric Rubin, M.D., Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
New England Journal of Medicine
Adjunct Professor
Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
665 Huntington Ave
Building 1, Room 811
Boston, MA 02115
phone: (617) 432-3335
erubin@hsph.harvard.edu
erubin@nejm.org

Mark Sawyer, M.D.
Professor of Clinical Pediatrics
8110 Birmingham Way
Bldg. 28, 1st Floor
San Diego, CA 92123
phone: (858) 966-7785
fax: (858) 966-8658
mhsawyer@ucsd.edu

Melinda Wharton, M.D., MPH
Associate Director for Vaccine Policy
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E05,
Atlanta, GA 30333
phone: (404) 639.8755
fax: (404) 639.8626
mew2@cdc.gov

Please be respectful and courteous. Let’s do this!

[stickdog99]

Among those under 80 years old, that 64 deaths from/with COVID-19 among the vaccinated compared to just 11 among the unvaccinated.

source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectiou ... 220201.pdf

[Joe Hillshoist]

.

There's at least 1 person in here that continues to hold firm to the canard that lockdowns were beneficial. Or however he currently chooses to frame it.

Johns Hopkins, January 2022: “While lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. [They] are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files ... tality.pdf

Cannard my arse. Where I lived they worked. Stickdog even posted a graph illustrating exactly that they worked, even tho he didn't realise it at the time.

[Joe Hillshoist]

REFUSE/RESIST.

Remaining protesters say they will not leave Ottawa until all COVID restrictions are lifted


Nathan (Jacko) Jack, an Australian living in Toronto, waves flags in front of trucks that are parked in front of Parliament Hill as a rally against COVID-19 restrictions, which began as a cross-country convoy protesting a federal vaccine mandate for truckers, continues in Ottawa, on Monday, January 31, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle

OTTAWA -- Crowds have thinned out considerably on Parliament Hill and the surrounding area, where anti-COVID restrictions demonstrators have been protesting for days.

But those that remain say they are staying put until all the restrictions are lifted, with the president of the Ottawa Gatineau Hotel Association saying some protesters have been extending their stays at hotels, or are asking to rebook for the coming weekend.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said yesterday he will not meet with anyone involved, noting reports that some participants have been seen harassing local businesses, waving Nazi flags, defecating on residential lawns, urinating on National War Memorial and stealing food from the homeless.


The Ottawa Paramedic Association reported that paramedics asked for police escorts after rocks were hurled at an ambulance from a truck in the convoy.

But Conservative Deputy Leader Candice Bergen said Trudeau was “gaslighting” the protesters, who deserve the chance to be heard and be given some respect.

She said the protesters she met with from her home province of Manitoba on Sunday are “good people, patriotic, peace-loving.”

Canada Unity, the group behind the convoy, originated during the 2019 pro-pipeline convoy to Ottawa but morphed into an anti-COVID restrictions protest after the pandemic began.

The vaccine mandate for truckers that took effect on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border earlier this month added more fire to the demands and helped trigger the bigger convoy that descended on Ottawa in the last week.

https://www.cp24.com/news/remaining-pro ... -1.5762501

Your mate Jack better be in a union waving that eureka flag.

[Joe Hillshoist]

Among those under 80 years old, that 64 deaths from/with COVID-19 among the vaccinated compared to just 11 among the unvaccinated.

source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectiou ... 220201.pdf

Do you know anything about maths?

What about the number of the population with vaccinations?

[stickdog99]

Among those under 80 years old, that 64 deaths from/with COVID-19 among the vaccinated compared to just 11 among the unvaccinated.

source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectiou ... 220201.pdf

Do you know anything about maths?

What about the number of the population with vaccinations?

Even if you assume that the officially reported vaccination rate of less than 5% unvaccinated is true (Do you? If so, why?) and even if you assume that these vaccines have ZERO adverse effects (Do you? If so, why?), what is the QALY benefit per vaccination dose?

Do you know anything about medicine?

[Joe Hillshoist]

You mean that bureaucratic try hard attempt to put some sort of number value on human life?

I dunno exactly how many people are vaccinated. But why would the official figures lie? I also know people who give vaccinations. Its their job, they do 30 to 50 a day at one of thousands of sites in NSW.. They've been working flat out for six months. Well they were. People don't seem as keen to get boosted (and why would you?) Now they are talking about making it mandatory.

Anyway...

Even the graphs you put up there show that pre Omicron vaccination was effective in preventing infection and very effective at preventing hospitalisation/death.

I don't understand why you refuse to accept Omicron is significantly different and changes things?

Its following an old evolutionary pathway that started developing long before our ancestors became human.

[alloneword]

https://rudolphrigger.substack.com/p/wh ... been-gooed

Thank you for that, BSav.

[***Wipes mouthful of coffee from screen***].

[stickdog99]

You mean that bureaucratic try hard attempt to put some sort of number value on human life?

I dunno exactly how many people are vaccinated. But why would the official figures lie? I also know people who give vaccinations. Its their job, they do 30 to 50 a day at one of thousands of sites in NSW.. They've been working flat out for six months. Well they were. People don't seem as keen to get boosted (and why would you?) Now they are talking about making it mandatory.

Anyway...

Even the graphs you put up there show that pre Omicron vaccination was effective in preventing infection and very effective at preventing hospitalisation/death.

I don't understand why you refuse to accept Omicron is significantly different and changes things?

Its following an old evolutionary pathway that started developing long before our ancestors became human.

The bottom line is that after 10 billion vaccines, case rates are the highest that they have ever been and all cause mortality among the young is also at the highest that it has ever been in almost every highly vaccinated nation. Yes, COVID-19 death rates are down slightly, but that is to be expected in the second year of a respiratory pandemic without or without vaccines due to better treatment regimes (that have been unconscionably suppressed just to promote vaccine uptake), huge swaths of the population gaining natural immunity, and expected viral evolution to less virulent strains. Natural immunity is far better than vaccine immunity against a wide variety of variants. The current vaccines instruct your cells to create a toxic spike protein to generate a specific immune response to something that effectively doesn't even exist anymore in the wild.

The only "argument' that vaccine zealots like you have to fall back on at this point is "But, but, trust us, it would have been far, far worse!"

Sorry, but it getting hard to trust you at this point since everything you have promised to date has turned out to be false other than the unfalsifiable claim that "it would have been far, far worse."

Of course, I admit that omicron is different, so different that all previous public health rationales for vaccine mandates that should have been opposed on principle have now been completely obliterated.

[alloneword]

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1050721/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-4.pdf

Before anyone accuses you of 'losing the plot', stickdog... Here it is:




(Week 5 should be out today).

[stickdog99]

Thanks for the graph!

[Harvey]

But why would the official figures lie?

It isn't necessary to ask why official figures would lie (as if the figures have some kind of agency). It is only necessary to look for evidence of lies. If official figures are lies, any systematic corruption will probably stick out like a sore thumb. Don't you think?

[Joe Hillshoist]

The bottom line is that after 10 billion vaccines, case rates are the highest that they have ever been and all cause mortality among the young is also at the highest that it has ever been in almost every highly vaccinated nation.

Not here.

Yes, COVID-19 death rates are down slightly, but that is to be expected in the second year of a respiratory pandemic without or without vaccines due to better treatment regimes (that have been unconscionably suppressed just to promote vaccine uptake), huge swaths of the population gaining natural immunity, and expected viral evolution to less virulent strains. Natural immunity is far better than vaccine immunity against a wide variety of variants.

Not here. We had very little natural immunity before December. Most of our population haven't been exposed to wild covid in any form, even now.

The current vaccines instruct your cells to create a toxic spike protein to generate a specific immune response to something that effectively doesn't even exist anymore in the wild.

The only "argument' that vaccine zealots like you have to fall back on at this point is "But, but, trust us, it would have been far, far worse!"

You can't say "Oh but the spike protein changed and the vaccine doesn't work any more" then say those changes make what happened earlier invalid. That's rubbish. The data you posted about where I live proves your points wrong. I've been saying Omicron is different for months now, well nearly months. Since mid December or earlier. You were laughing at that idea then. Now you're using the very things I've been telling you for six weeks to claim some bullshit I'm not even saying. Get fucked.

And you're going on with the abuse again you rude cunt, calling me a zealot. I've already come on here and said no way I'd recommend someone under 30 get vaccinated (unless they had severe immunocompromise of some sort) and that if I'd known Omicron was coming along so quickly i wouldn't have done it myself. That makes me a zealot does it? Okay then fine. You need a punch in the face you unvaccinated, germ carrying disease machine.

Sorry, but it getting hard to trust you at this point since everything you have promised to date has turned out to be false other than the unfalsifiable claim that "it would have been far, far worse."

Your own fucken graph shows that. Open your fucken eyes.

Of course, I admit that omicron is different, so different that all previous public health rationales for vaccine mandates that should have been opposed on principle have now been completely obliterated.

You still trying to claim I'm in favour of mandatory vaccinations you lying puddle of dog vomit?

[Belligerent Savant]

.

There's at least 1 person in here that continues to hold firm to the canard that lockdowns were beneficial. Or however he currently chooses to frame it.

Johns Hopkins, January 2022: “While lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. [They] are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

...

https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files ... tality.pdf

Cannard my arse. Where I lived they worked. Stickdog even posted a graph illustrating exactly that they worked, even tho he didn't realise it at the time.

Ha - good to see you were game for a bit of ribbing.

Lockdowns may well have worked, for a period of time.

But as with most things, on a long enough timeline efficacy (along with cost vs benefit) will wane and/or turn negative, especially when social constructs are heavily altered.

[alloneword]

UKHSA report week 5