Luther Blissett » Mon Dec 05, 2016 6:24 pm wrote:guruilla » Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:14 pm wrote:That seems like a silly &/or disingenous comment to me; no one has claimed that children are being abducted from parents at CPP.
Check your ideology at the door, brother. [comment edited for snark factor]
Yes, there are no claims because the entire thing was invented whole cloth, not from listening to survivor's accounts or claims of victims. My ideology is to listen to survivors' accounts, what is yours?
Luther, you can't just make statement like "the entire thing was invented whole cloth" without giving
something to back that up.
The notion that there is no crime without survivor testimony is one that serves the interests primarily of child abusers. WHAT ABOUT CHILDREN WHO ARE ABUSED WHEN THEY ARE PRE-VERBAL, for the love of God? And what if you add to that the fact, or at least the strong possibility, that many victims of child sex trafficking & ritual abuse do not live to tell the tale and their bodies are never found? Or that a vast percentage of those who do live to tell the tale, don't? Ever?
Things came to light in the UK about Jimmy Savile when one person came forward and it started a chain reaction. That was
decades after the event in question. WTF are you even
talking about??Look at the massive amounts of evidence linked to or cited on this thread that Pizzagate was NOT created whole cloth, that it ties into any number of actual, hard leads. Add to that the fact that even the "circumstantial" stuff is, by any caring human standard,
profoundly damning. Imagine if I were to make jokes about pedophilia or post suggestive pictures of people's kids with insinuating sexual remarks about them? Jeeze Louise: How long do you think I'd last at this forum?!!
I am puzzled as to where did this faux-"toleration"-standard emerged from, that people like Alefantis can act in a manner that is so blatantly sexually dodgy and somehow it's OK because... because what? He's a democrat? Gay? An artist? A restaurant owner? I don't even know
what the rationale is, to be frank; apparently it's simply because he hasn't been
proven to be a pedophile so any indications he
might be involved in pedophilia ~
including solid leads that have nothing at all to do with his sick-ass Instagram account ~ should just be ignored?
But why? Because you've been ideologically hoodwinked to believe that the whole Pizzagate thing was invented whole cloth by right-wing Trumpites to smear Hillary? So then it doesn't matter if there are solid leads to follow, you can just keep crying "Fake news" along with SLAD and the rest of the puppet brigade that have, miraculously, become mouthpieces for MSM almost overnight, I guess out of unbridled terror that they might get pulled into a Mass Shooting Event (in which, pls note, no shots were fired)? Or worse, be associated with Alex Jones?
I'm sorry about the histrionics; I guess it's because I am
truly horrified, especially considering that, on top of all this, you have the gall to talk to me about social justice. All I can say to that is, with apologies for the snark coz I know it doesn't help, thank God abused children don't have to wait around for
you to get yr shit together.
Truly, man. Just
WOW.
It is a lot easier to fool people than show them how they have been fooled.